An Analysis Of John Locke's Political Ideas Of The French Revolution

Better Essays
The French Revolution was a huge milestone in France. It was because it changed the structure of society but instead of replacing the existing rules or even the political regime. The French got rid of the government as a whole. (Horvat) The French Revolution contradicted John Locke 's main political ideas of the the Enlightenment theory. John Locke 's main Ideas of the Enlightenment mostly talked about the government. They were contradictory because John Locke believed that all men are rational and capable people. (Primary Source Media) But he says that the people must also have a say in the government. (Primary Source Media) That idea completely goes against the French Revolution. The French Revolution was anything but rational or capable. The Third Estate went berzerk, overthrowing the royal family and then started killing everyone who opposed them. (Horvat) Even after the people started getting more power they were not able to use it wisely enough to get their city to perpetuate and prosper. (Horvat & Johnson)
In 1682 John Locke was known in England for being a
…show more content…
They were not rational because as soon as the Third Estate no longer had a say in government affairs like they did in one point, they revolted against the monarchy killing the king and queen of France. (Horvat) The French people 's decisions were driven more by their emotions than logical and conscious thinking. If the French thought out what was going on and the best way to solve this problem they might have been able save the city and save lives. The French people were not capable of power because when they were in power they were so worried about getting back at the people they believed had harmed them emotionally or physically. So when the people of France got in control of France they started killing . Every day 56 people were killed. (Horvat) If anyone did not believe in the revolt against the monarchy they were

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Europe was petrified that their citizens would revolt against their government too, and so all of Europe got involved in the revolution. The situation got even worse when the new government of France made the Decree of Fraternity, which stated that France would help any country who chose to revolt against their government. Later, Europe’s fear occurred because the Dutch, Belgians, and Poles were inspired by this revolution (623). Each country fought the revolutionaries and some countries tried to rescue the royal family with no success. Austria tried saving the royal family but the king was recognized by a postmaster who knew him from “his portrait on the new French money” (605).…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout the Reign of Terror, the government imposed new laws, such as the levée en masse, which was a mandatory military draft. Many French citizens rebelled against the draft (Doc C). Additionally, France’s primary enemies, Prussia and Austria, sent armies to try to reinstate the monarchy so that revolution would not spread to their countries. Because no one wanted to fight in this war, the levée en masse was imposed (Doc C). Because of the backlash against this law and the counterrevolution in the Vendée region of France, the government began to create harsher punishments for what they considered to be treason.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    European leaders also were stuck with fear that their countries would see that light in Locke’s ideas of what a government should and shouldn’t be, and revolt against their leaders. To combat this the leaders quickly and efficiently restored France to a monarchy putting King Louis XVI in charge of France again. The French revolution also set a social standard that if a government was not effectively protecting citizen’s natural rights and keeping general order then it was likely going to be overthrown. This added an incentive for monarchs to keep their citizens happy, not just the rich ones either; the whole population. If it was possible for the 3rd estate to overthrow the French government, it was possible anywhere and for any reason.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Emerich and Edward Dalberg states in a document, “The ideas of the philosophies were not directly responsible for the outbreak… the spark that changed thought into action was supplied but the Declaration of American Independence...The American example caused the Revolution to break out…” (Acton, Emerich, Dalberg). Having France help America fight for independance caused the people to rebel because it gave them hope and ideas that they can also fight for rights and a better country. The country was in debt, the people were starving, and many were not satisfied with the rulers, so America ultimately caused the rebellion of France. Many people wanted more power, money, and rights and the Declaration of Independence gave France a push to overthrow the king. Another document written by Arthur Young states, “...but bankruptcy occasion in a civil war, and a total overthrow of the government?” (Young).…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A Jacobin is the pro-revolution people of France. The enemies of the revolution were called the Girondins. Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The French people saw how the rebellion of America of the English powerhouse successfully worked. They realized that they could overthrow the government of France that were keeping all of the nice supplies and food to themselves while the people were starving in the streets[15]. The storming of the Bastille could’ve been started because of the revolution. The French got hope and found a desire to overthrow their own government from the American Revolution. In a way, the American Revolution caused the French Revolution.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It opposed the radical behaviors of the sans-culotte group that pushed for policies that were in favor of property owners. In the year of 1795 the National Convention got rid of many of their economic controls, let prices increase, and heavily regulated political organizations. Members of the Convention demanded that Robespierre was arrested and killed and the Reign of Terror then ended when he was sent to the guillotine. The French Reign of terror had the impact on the French Revolution of giving it a bad image due to many new corrupt ways being implemented. It also resulted in the reasonless arrest and execution of many individuals because there were no rules or regulations that classified a person as an enemy of the Committee.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The French were furious by the foreign intervention and cause many people who were once pro-monarchy to turn against it. A reason the war was to blame for the downfall of the monarchy was because the Brunswick manifesto caused the mayor of Paris to go to the…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unfortunately, these savages changed the outcome of how French citizens are treated, even today, without this revolution many citizens may still be contained within the Monarchy Laws. “Historians have agreed the the French Revolution was an event that changed Europe irrevocably.” King Louis XVI, Maximillian Robespierre, as well as the Jacobins, are one in the same, in their ignoble ways. With the exception, the Jacobins sought out for resolutions for the people, while King Louis XVI disregarded his people. Just as many other battles, this was a desperate needed change, and the country of France, as well as many others have grown around the knowledge gained from the actions of the…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Did France benefit from Louis XVI execution, or was it just a recipe for disaster? I would argue the effect of Louis XVI, who was the king of France from 1774-1793, ended catastrophically and lead to the downfall of France. Even though one can argue Louis XVI was a traitor to his country, his execution only lead to corruption. The people were lost without a king to follow, and those who were not, were far too radical to lead an entire country successfully. Almost immediately after Louis XVI execution, groups were formed and the country fell into wrong hands several times, leading to disastrous events.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays