Role Of John Locke In A State Of Nature Essay

Superior Essays
Throughout this essay I will discuss key issues like what role does the state of nature play? and What is the state of nature?. I will also discuss political authority and how it is justified. I will be using most of my research from John Locke, a well known English philosopher. One of the fundamental questions of political philosophy that people ask is when is political authority legitimate, or when do we have to obey the duties that the state give us?, or who has the right to rule the state?. John Locke believed that having a government was a good thing, as it brought obedience to us, however a more limited government would be better. My main aim throughout this essay is to analyse Locke’s views on the state of nature and the government and …show more content…
I agree with what Locke has to say here, which is, in simpler terms, that anyone who abides by the law and treats it with respect will never have any reason to harm anyone else. Some people wonder will we ever know what living in a state of nature will ever be like. Locke says that to be in a State of nature means to observe the peace and preservation of all mankind and that everyone has the right to punish the fugitives of the law of nature to such a degree, as may block its misdemeanour (p.7). By acting this way I believe that Locke is correct in what he is saying. If everyone is treated as equals there would be no need for war in the world, this is why people question will we ever know what ti feels like to be in a state of nature, for the world categorises people, from their gender, religion, sexuality or disability, no one is treated fairly, Which brings in political authority. Are the government making this problem better or worse? From what I can see people in third world countries have no say in how the government is picked, yet they still have to abide by the rules that are made for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke’s social contract is similar to the Preamble in the sense that both require the government to listen to the people and be subject to its laws. As well as this , the rulers are entrusted to uphold the law and protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens. This theory can be found in another line from the Preamble, “that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”. The vision of individualism within the structure of the law of nature is integrated heavily within Locke’s book Two Treatises of Government as well as in the Declaration of…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke states that the government is obligated to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property at all cost. In Locke’s eyes the purpose of government is to secure and protect the natural rights and in return the people must obey the laws created by their rulers. This basis of an arrangement is detailed in the American Declaration of Independence as well. The document explains that when and if a government becomes destructive “it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it;” this would be know as Locke’s social contract between the government and its’ people. In this contract Locke details that the citizens of a state would turn over their power to an established government when that said government signs a contract declaring that its’ members will have the common interest in mind.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On one hand, John Locke believed that the state of nature is unsatisfactory, the government was therefore formed by social contract since people agree to transfer some of their rights to a centralized government in order to secure enjoyment of their properties. (Locke, 1764) Obviously, the formation of the American government is an example to illustrate Locke’s idea. The United States government derives its legitimacy and legal authority from the consent of the majority…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    JOHN LOCKE 1. What does Locke mean when he refers to the laws of nature? Describe what rights and liberties man would have living in a state of nature. Be sure to include specific examples from the reading. (2 pts.)…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Founding Fathers wrote their articles they had a lot of major political ideas, which are political beliefs to make a fair life for everyone together possible with rights and laws. It is one 's political moral code and worldview. The most important major political idea are the laws of nature and nature’s God.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Locke’s views from the Second Treatise of Government In the Second Treatise of Government, John Locke expressed many of his own views on the relation of the individual to society and more specifically the rights one has in society and the responsibilities these rights come with. First, he explains the right of ontological equality. Each person has the right and ability to execute natural law at will: “the equality of men by nature (Locke 147).…

    • 1573 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intro Can you imagine a world without individual freedom? The Enlightment years introduced individual freedom to society. There was a sense of freedom to explore new ideas and promote advancement to the people. During the Enlightment years many people begin to develop thought provoking ideas and advancements that changed society tremendously. Some of the advancements developed during the Enlightment years remain the same now, such as different rights included in The Bill of Rights.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Locke’s view the law of nature dictates two things, self-preservation, and preservation of all others as long as those goals don’t conflict. That is the most we can give to government when we create on out of political society. Since that is all the possible power people can give to the government the legislative powers necessarily limited to preserving the political society which set it up. That general limitation breaks down into four specifications which explains why people can’t remain in the state of nature.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will demonstrate the apparent contrast or correlation between Locke 's beliefs and these three individuals. Johns Locke, an English political thinker, believed that Men have real freedom, expresses the power of their mind when they are happily directed. This free man in its conquest of happiness is the man of the state of nature. He has a life of its own and has the right and duty to preserve. The state of nature refers to the state before human existence became socially organized.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some might argue that John Locke and his philosophy are insignificant. They might believe that life, liberty and property are not mandatory rights that the government should have the power to protect. It is possible for them to not be educated enough on the topic to fully understand it’s impertinence. I argue that our natural rights are the most necessary rights to defend. They are the foundation of our country, government, and society.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because it doesn’t matter how much we complain about poor management of the state’ dealings and/or regulations imposed to us. There are no excuses for resisting power because it is the only thing between us and what we most want to avoid, the State of Nature. John Locke had a different approach as to the kind of place the State of Nature is, and consequently his argument concerning the Social Contract and the relationship between men and authority varies. According to Locke, the State of Nature is the natural condition of mankind.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays