Locke is very clear on this question, but it leads to trouble and tension with his previous statements. Locke says “the people shall be judge” (386). Locke argues that while individuals have given up their right to rebel, the collective mass of people in the society that has given their consent has the right to judge the legislature or king of the land. This view sets a dangerous precedent that disregards everything that was a defense of the theory in the previous sections of the treatise. If the people can determine when an action is against the people, numerous revolutions will occur. It is not difficult for collective action to spill over into a total rejection of a state action. People are easily galvanized to action even under small provocations. This straw undermines the previous defenses of his theory. People are keen to overreact and exaggerate “every little mismanagement in public affairs” when it is their liberty on the line (376). Never before had the people been given so much power over a legislature or ruler, and this power would surely corrupt the populace with a thirst for vengeance. The people would call for revolution after revolution, because the power that Locke provides vests them with the final protection of their rights and
Locke is very clear on this question, but it leads to trouble and tension with his previous statements. Locke says “the people shall be judge” (386). Locke argues that while individuals have given up their right to rebel, the collective mass of people in the society that has given their consent has the right to judge the legislature or king of the land. This view sets a dangerous precedent that disregards everything that was a defense of the theory in the previous sections of the treatise. If the people can determine when an action is against the people, numerous revolutions will occur. It is not difficult for collective action to spill over into a total rejection of a state action. People are easily galvanized to action even under small provocations. This straw undermines the previous defenses of his theory. People are keen to overreact and exaggerate “every little mismanagement in public affairs” when it is their liberty on the line (376). Never before had the people been given so much power over a legislature or ruler, and this power would surely corrupt the populace with a thirst for vengeance. The people would call for revolution after revolution, because the power that Locke provides vests them with the final protection of their rights and