John Locke Vs Rousseau

Decent Essays
Like Rousseau, John Locke was an Enlightenment thinker, yet the two had very different opinions, as Locke believed in forming a political power that will keep people's rights and form law. He claimed that the political power should be the ones to form the laws and to command the citizens and that the laws should be equal for all. Whether to the rich or the poor, and that the laws should be put together only for the good of the people, they cannot raise the taxes fee without people awareness. The people do not have to agree to the rules and the political power cannot force the citizens to obey them. In a case which the people agree to follow the political power’s rules but the laws that the put together are harming them they have the right to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The enlightenment was one of the most revolutionary times in this world and there were lots of incredible and extraordinary thinker during this period of time, which all of them shaped and impacted the world but John Locke however was one of most revolutionary thinkers of that time that since he influenced and impacted how governments functioned and the power of common folk’s say in the government power and limits. Essentially John Locke principles influenced and profoundly improved on our understanding on how governments should function as said that “…..John Locke, was an outspoken supporter of equal rights within a governed society. He espoused the natural rights of man, namely the right to life, liberty and property, and he articulated that every government’s purpose is to secure these rights for its nationals. ”(Broers, 1) John Locke’s work on natural theory is famous and has been touched by other philosophers such as Thomas…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed in the Social Contract Theory, which stated that if people choose to have government then they are entering a contract that allows legitimate authority to be in power. However, in doing so, the people will lose a few rights. The people can also revolt and overthrow that government if said government failed to protect the rights of their citizens. (p. 15) It is also important to note that Locke was mainly interested in protecting private property and did not particularly care about voter turnout, unlike Loeb or Hobbes.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke was a vocal supporter of the freedoms of equality and the protection of democratic government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke stated that “there [is] nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank…should also be equal” (Document A). This idea of equality among citizens was important in promoting acceptance and fairness in English society after the adoption of a constitutional monarchy. In addition, Locke believed that, “When the government is dissolved, the people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative[ure]” (Document A). This revolutionary idea of overthrowing a failing government greatly influenced the American colonists in their revolt against Great Britain, and is evidenced in the Declaration of Independence.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke was very different from another great philosopher named Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that the individual was completely helpless and corrupt. He believed that a monarchy was the best form of government. He came up with this because he traveled around the world learning about forms of government to help England’s. John locke, on the other hand, believed only that the whole was better than the self.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke an english philosophe says in the Second Treatise on Civil Government, “a state of perfect freedom to order their possessions and to order actions… within bounds of the law of nature… ”(Document A). In other words John Locke argues that people should have freedoms within limits. According to Locke, if the government fails the people, the people have the power to overthrow the government. Freedom was the main idea of Locke’s thoughts about government because, all…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that the government should be ran by the people and everything should be made in the people’s favor. In the situation where the old government fails he recommended the legislative and executive branches but this decision is should be made by people. John Locke once stated in the “Second treatise on the Civil Government” “All Men are naturally “a state of perfect freedom… within the bounds of the law of nature”(Document A). What he meant from this is that We are all free and no one can stop us.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Rights Vs Feminism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As stated by Locke, “To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and this is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man” (Roots of Wisdom Pg. 365). Consequently, Locke believed that citizen should organize to protect their natural rights, to ensure that these right are not being abused by people of power or the government. As a result, Locke developed a social contract that states that the government and its people had mutual responsibilities in protecting these rights. On the other hand, Locke believed that “living in a state may entail consent to a social contract, but if the state abuses the power entrusted to it by its citizens, they retain the right to rebel” (Roots of Wisdom Pg.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Beginning in the 1600s, European philosophers began thinking about how a nation should be governed. Many of these philosophers began moving towards a democracy, rather than the absolute monarchy they were under. Two of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers were John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived at different times during the Enlightenment period, Locke from 1632 to 1704 and Rousseau from 1712 to 1778, their thoughts on society and its political form are comparable. Both Locke and Rousseau believed that the people should form a government, however, their ideas of government differed.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founders of the Declaration of Independence sought to create a government that would be formed from the ideas and concepts that they had encountered through their various readings and studies. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are by far the most influential thinkers of the Constitution and continue to affect American thought even today. Many of John Locke’s ideas directly correlate with those included in the Declaration of Independence yet they are reworded to suit the needs of the new government.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke’s Second Treatise of Government allowed for the ideal that no ruler or government could do whatever they pleased because there were moral laws that encompassed all of society. However, Rousseau was adamant in his belief that man “is born free and everywhere he is in chains. ”1 Rousseau defended the right of the people to rule, he argued that the people were only accountable for themselves and the ruler or government had no right to subjugate the people. Locke and Rousseau’s idea of government are similar in the fact that they both embody some aspects of our government today. Rousseau inspired the phrase “We the people…”2 at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence because of his belief in the wisdom of the people to decide in their own affairs.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume discusses much about how morality is just based off of our own volition. I believe this to be true. Hume extends on this further stating impulse arises not from reason, but is only directed by it. While humans have a general knowledge of right and wrong, it ultimately is up to our passions and sensations that drive us to our moral decisions. I find Hume to have a very original, thought out, and realistic take on how moral decisions are derived and where reason stands in one’s decision making.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the comparison of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau and their respective ideas of The Social Contract I would like to begin by breaking down what the Social Contract is and all its encompassing ideas. The concept of social contract theory is that before civilization man lived in the state of nature in its purest form. There was no central body of governance and no law to regulate society. This meant there were hardships and oppression on certain sections of the society because they had nobody fighting for them. To overcome from these hardships people entered into agreements known as “social contracts”.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs. Rousseau

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and explaining the way that Hobbes and Rousseau’s ideas regarding the national condition of human beings differ. In my exegesis, I will be discussing how in Leviathan (ch. 13), Hobbes takes a stance regarding egoism, the idea that man always acts in their own interest. I will also be discussing the fact that Rousseau is fundamentally opposed to the ideas in which Hobbes presents. Rousseau believes that society taints the fundamental core beliefs of mankind. I will then present the critical point of this paper: the fact that the two philosophers have very conflicting viewpoints on the concept of human nature.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Understanding about Nature-Nurture As I read John Locke’s and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s theories I became more and more intrigued with their points of view. I have to admit that I agreed more with one than the other but nevertheless both had valid points and interesting ways of seeing human development. John “Locke argues that observations of children will show that...ideas are not present from the beginning and that they are learned” (Crain, 2011 p. 7). He goes on to say that “it is more accurate to think of the child’s mind as a blank slate, and whatever comes into the mind comes from the environment” (Crain, 2011 p. 7).…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays