Compare And Contrast John Locke And Jean Jacque Rousseau

Superior Essays
John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory.
At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior. Although both philosophers believe in a State of Nature, they do not necessarily believe in the same concepts within the theory. In Locke’s
…show more content…
Locke believed in a limited, representative government while Rousseau believed in a direct form of government by the people. Locke believed that the powers of the government are to be limited. He believed the government should only exist to protect life, liberty, and property and if the government were to overstep that authority, then the public would have a right to overthrow the government. As I said before, Thomas Jefferson paid homage to these ideals during his drafting of the Declaration of Independence. Along with separation of powers between the House of Commons and House of Lords,2 Locke’s ideals greatly influenced American government where power is vested in a bicameral legislature along with an executive and judicial branch. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government allowed for the ideal that no ruler or government could do whatever they pleased because there were moral laws that encompassed all of society. However, Rousseau was adamant in his belief that man “is born free and everywhere he is in chains.”1 Rousseau defended the right of the people to rule, he argued that the people were only accountable for themselves and the ruler or government had no right to subjugate the people. Locke and Rousseau’s idea of government are similar in the fact that they both embody some aspects of our government today. Rousseau inspired the phrase “We the people…”2 at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence because of his belief in the wisdom of the people to decide in their own affairs. However, I believe that Locke is more correct in his account of human beings and the ideal form of government. He inspired the foundation of our branches of government and ultimately his argument over civil society is more just than Rousseau. Rousseau’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The enlightenment was one of the most revolutionary times in this world and there were lots of incredible and extraordinary thinker during this period of time, which all of them shaped and impacted the world but John Locke however was one of most revolutionary thinkers of that time that since he influenced and impacted how governments functioned and the power of common folk’s say in the government power and limits. Essentially John Locke principles influenced and profoundly improved on our understanding on how governments should function as said that “…..John Locke, was an outspoken supporter of equal rights within a governed society. He espoused the natural rights of man, namely the right to life, liberty and property, and he articulated that every government’s purpose is to secure these rights for its nationals. ”(Broers, 1) John Locke’s work on natural theory is famous and has been touched by other philosophers such as Thomas…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The “Founding Fathers” of the United States would have answers to today’s most controversial issues, whether those are cases of police brutality in Baltimore or questions on the rights of same-sex couples through the nation. The era which brought into being the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is often referred to as the "New Enlightenment" during this era our Founding Fathers turn to the great works of Enlightenment philosophy when the time came to construct a new government. This new government would put man’s right as the top priority and working together to prohibit the rule of tyrannical leaders such as King George III of England. Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu, Beccaria, and Locke ideas on the form and…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though Rousseau’s ideas differ there are also some similarities. Rousseau, like Locke, believed that men are born free. Both Locke and Rousseau agreed that men had certain natural rights that they should not give up to any leader. Rousseau believed men in a state of nature are free and equal, but in a state of nature men were very different; Rousseau described men in a state of nature as “noble savages.” The only way to notice the many differences in Rousseau’s thinking in comparison to Locke and Montesquieu is by first looking at his…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke and Rousseau’s unequal views of state of nature resulted in their different ideas of…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Underlying Adams’ quote is the important question as to whether society is progressive and has positive implications for humans, or whether its implications are negative and corrupting. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Émile Durkheim are two political theorists who battle in their writing to determine what is bad and what is good about society. This essay will consider how progressive or corrupting society is and in what ways, according to Rousseau and Durkheim. The essay will explore Rousseau’s argument about the ‘chains’ of society, and look at Durkheim’s contrasting view of the value of community in society.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off, they each had a distinctive understanding of human nature from one another. To Rousseau, humans in primitive times were "noble savages" and it is "civilization" that turned man into a "beast". Conversely, Hobbes believed that being "civilized" is a positive trait and being uncivilized or a "savage" is bad. Concerning human nature, Rousseau theorized that humans were innately good and generous, before being corrupted by the vices of civilization. Human life was most likely peaceful and compassionate as described in his opening line, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The state of nature is viewed differently by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Hobbes views that state of nature and man in a negative light with everyone being only for themselves. Locke views the state of nature in…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will demonstrate the apparent contrast or correlation between Locke 's beliefs and these three individuals. Johns Locke, an English political thinker, believed that Men have real freedom, expresses the power of their mind when they are happily directed. This free man in its conquest of happiness is the man of the state of nature. He has a life of its own and has the right and duty to preserve. The state of nature refers to the state before human existence became socially organized.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of freedom in Jean Jacque Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762) is present throughout the book and Rousseau’s own, personal understanding of freedom underpins his argument for his ideal state. In this essay I will argue that individual citizens aren’t truly free in every sense in Rousseau’s state as the sovereign has complete dominion over public matters and due to the sovereign explicitly being composed of every citizen, this could lead to nearly every problem being deemed within the public realm. Furthermore, one cannot be individually free, in my opinion, when one cannot voice dissent against the prevailing convention of society, as is the case in Rousseau’s state. To argue this thesis effectively I will explore what freedom means…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The majority is always right. All of these conflicting political proposals spark from the “state of man” and the “state of nature”. After the glorious revolution, Locke wrote the Second Treatise on Civil Government, which was groundbreaking for its time. The premise of Locke’s idea was that the power derived in the people.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau stood firm in his belief of what the right form of government would look like or at least appear to be, but also argues that people are surrendering rights and freedom to themselves while establishing a civil society. In the reading A World of Ideas; Jean-Jacques Rousseau “The Origin of Civil Society” by Lee Jacobus, they briefly describe what kind of arguments and challenges he had faced from opposing famous philosophers ' beliefs. Some of which including those who played a role in aiding the development of the type of government seen in America today. In the book Jacobus…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rousseau offers an unrealistic and damaging account of human nature” critically respond to this statement with reference to either Hobbes or Machiavelli. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a political philosopher who has made a great impact on the area of politics. Even though his perspectives are utopian and are different to both Hobbes and Machiavelli. His contribution has made a significant impact in the way that politics is conceived. Therefore, it is the contention of this essay by using Machiavelli’s ideology to expose that Rousseau's ideas about human nature are utopian and in a sense damaging for the society.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays