John Hockenberry Climate Of Doubt Analysis

In the PBS FRONTLINE news report, Climate of Doubt, John Hockenberry explores how climate skeptics argue against the global scientific consensus, thus contributing to the increase in climate change skepticism in the last six years. These skeptics come together, construct an argument on one point of view, and undermine the public’s beliefs of climate change. The \ strategy, the basic argument, they use to address climate change is simply denying the fact that human activity causes global warming. More so, this movement gained strength during the time the economy failed. The Hot Air action consisted of a hot air balloon with a banner that said, “Cap-and-trade means higher taxes, lost jobs, less freedom.” This proves that the public turned away from the government and its climate change policies when skeptics gave them reasons to believe it was untrue by saying the efforts to address the threat of climate change contributed to the recession. …show more content…
Certainly, this does lead the public to question their personal opinion on climate change. However, having no reliable reason behind the act, climate change skeptics view denying the consensus as their top priority. This shows the thoughts of climate change skeptics: they do not have to understand the science behind climate because they know how to manipulate the beliefs of the public. Therefore, I don’t think there is a scientific basis for arguments presented by climate change skeptics because the climate denial movement is aware that they do not need to win the battle of climate change through scientific argument, just as long as they convince the public there are misconceptions concerning the scientific theories regarding climate