Boston Massacre History

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… England had enacted the Stamp Act, imposing taxes on Americans in 55 different ways. Americans, who had always managed their money in their own assemblies, considered, the act was unconstitutional. Naturally they were furious. John Hancock was also furious. He said there was nothing or no one on earth that could make him pay a penny of that “dammed tax.” He said it loudly and often. When Samuel Adams and other people heard it, they cheered him. The next year was good news. England repealed the Stamp Act. “The news was brought to Boston in John Hancock’s brig the Harrison,” and John announced it to the public. So after the news, John threw a grand party. “He festooned his house with flags, piled his table high with food, and lighted up all of his windows. When the house was full, he rolled out a 126 gallons cask of Madeira wine.” Everybody was cheering at him as the fireworks were set off. On May 1768, John Hancock was elected to the Massachusetts House of Representatives. “The House elected him each year to the Governor’s Council, but the Governor rejected his appointments until 1771 when the Governor changed his mind.” Hancock turned down the position and said that he was no longer interested in politics. On March 1770, The Boston Massacre had occurred. After the Massacre, the citizens at the Faneuil Hall appointed a committee to meet with the Governor Hutchinson and Colonel Dalrymple to demand the removal of troops. Hancock warned the governor that “there are upwards of 4,000 men ready to take arms.” Dalrymple agreed to remove both regiments to the Castle Island. As soon as Samuel Adams popularity declined after the Massacre, Hancock said the he would never have a relationship with Adams. (Fritz, …show more content…
In that same year, he was elected as that president of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress, and presided over its Committee of Safety. Under Hancock, Massachusetts was able to raise bands of "minutemen", soldiers who pledged to be ready for battle on short notice, and his boycott of tea imported by the British East India Company eventually led to the Boston Tea Party. In April 1775 as the British intent became apparent, Hancock and Samuel Adams slipped away from Boston to elude capture, staying in the Hancock-Clarke House in Lexington, Massachusetts (which can still be seen to this day). There Paul Revere supposedly roused them about midnight before the British troops arrived at dawn for the Battle of Lexington and Concord, but Prescott was the one who actually informed Hancock and Adams. At this time, General Thomas Gage ordered Hancock and Adams arrested for treason. Following the battle a proclamation was issued granting a general pardon to all who would demonstrate loyalty to the crown, with the exceptions of Hancock and Adams. On May 24, 1775, he was elected the third President of the Second Continental Congress, succeeding Peyton Randolph. From October 27, 1775 to July 1, 1776, his title was "President of the United Colonies". From July 2, 1776 to October 29, 1777, the title was "President of the Continental Congress of the United States of America". He would serve through some of the darkest days of the Revolutionary War including Washington's defeats in New York and New Jersey as well as Great Britain's occupation of Philadelphia until resigning his office in York, Pennsylvania on October 30, 1777. He was succeeded by Henry Laurens. In the first month of his presidency, on June 19, 1775, Hancock commissioned George Washington commander-in-chief of the Continental Army. In all spring of 1777, the members of Congress had been arguing about

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Stamp Act Dbq

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On April 19, 1775, from an unknown origin along the open plains of Lexington, Massachusetts Bay, a musket shot sailed through the open air between where an American militia and a British troop regiment were currently standing off. In its wake, an uncoordinated British retaliation left several militiamen dead. The end of salutary neglect had brought an increasingly tighter grip on the colonists of the still-budding British America, from the restrictive trading policies placed by the Sugar Act to the direct tax enacted by the Stamp Act, culminating in the grouped “Intolerable Acts” of 1774. Various congresses had formed to discuss the Stamp Act and Intolerable Acts to no avail, openly rejected and scoffed at by King George III, the reigning…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Washington was a Virginian representative to the First Continental Congress. He was again present at the Second Continental Congress. Here John Adams argued that this seasoned soldier should lead the new Continental Army. Washington believed in the cause so much that he accepted the job without pay. Washington achieved his first victory, that of retaking Boston, without much difficulty.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later in the document he was also asked, "Do you think the people of America would submit to pay the stamp duty, if it was moderated?" Franklin's response was, " No, never, unless compelled by force of arms." This lets the British government know American's are not happy with the Stamp Act and do not want to pay it, because it does not pertain to them. The only way they would pay it is if they were forced by force…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two actions which had the most impact on the decision to declare independence from Britain were the Stamp Act and the Boston Massacre. The Stamp Act was a new kind of tax for the colonists. The Stamp Act made the colonists question the power of the Parliament. “If the British can pass the Stamp Act, imagine what other taxes they might pass in the future?” The Boston Massacre changed the view of both the colonists and the British.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was also sharing the role of treasurer of the Continental Congress with Michael Hillegas. He went with Matthew Sampson to visit the northern army. He resigned his role of Congress on 1780. He was elected a seat in the Philadelphia legislative and was sent to represent his state in the Constitutional Convention in 1782. James Wilson September 14, 1742 – August 21, 1798 Revolutionary Times - In 1774, Wilson wrote a paper saying the British Government had no say in the United States.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcmath Dbq

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “I will not stand for this!” screamed Herschel Mcmillan, an American colonist of the 1700’s. Bill Weavers, Jack Hilory, Jeff Mcmath, and Christopher Shun all met up in the home of Herschel Mcmillan to discuss the new law put into action by the British Parliament. On March 22, 1765, a new tax on all paper documents was forced onto the American colonies, causing a great deal of conflict between the British and the American colonists. This law was named the Stamp Act. As the children and women took care of household business, the men of the family met to discuss this new issue.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In June of 1776 he was elected to attend the provincial conference to send delegates to the Continental Congress. He was appointed to represent Philadelphia that year and so signed the Declaration of Independence. In 1777 he was surgeon-general of the middle department of the Continental Army. This office led to some trouble for him; he was critical of the administration of the Army Medical service under Dr. William Shippen. He complained to Washington, who deferred to the Congress.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    American Colonies Dbq

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After the first riot attacking the Stamp Office and Oliver, directly and indirectly respectively, it was “Still approved of as a necessary declaration of their resolution not to submit to the Stamp Act”. The only thing that appeased the rioters – or the whole of Boston in general – was when, in the following days after the first riot, Oliver resigned his post as Stamp Officer and made a public declaration that “He would immediately apply for leave to resign, and would not act in the office…until he received further orders”. Conversely, after Hutchinson’s house was destroyed, at the next meeting the Council unanimously “Declared an utter detestation of the extraordinary and violent proceedings of a number of persons unknown, against some of the inhabitants of the town”. They also created a proclamation that would reward anyone who gave information about the members of the mob as warrants were being written and signed – although, these actions did little good since it was suspected that some participants in the mob were a part of the Council, and any attempts to arrest individuals were halted under the threat of more violence. And while Oliver announced that he would resign his post, as the mob had ‘encouraged’ him to do; Hutchinson responded to the rumors about his support of the Stamp Act by denying that he had spent any time “Aiding, assisting, or supporting, or in the least promoting or encouraging what is commonly called…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As their punishment, the two soldiers were branded on their thumbs and discharged from the military permanently. Even though Captain Preston and his men were found not guilty, the Revolutionary War had already begun. Many of the Loyalists, the people who were loyal to Britain, had already sided with the Patriots, the people who wanted freedom. The Patriots then rebelled against Britain even more, they went to war with them, a war that would soon be known as the Revolutionary War.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The citizens of Boston didn't have guns or swords, they had to use rocks in snowballs, and sticks to fight the soldiers back(“The Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770”). In the text, it states that Mr. Samuel Grey was killed on the spot when a snowball entered his head damaging a large portion of his skull. Soldiers showed no mercy and shot an innocent African American citizen causing death to the man(“The Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770”). If that one drunk soldier wouldn't have used his sword on that little boy, it could've prevented a lot of deaths. Otherwise, they were to blame for the incidents just by using a deadly weapon first.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    British Missteps Analysis

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Quartering Act required colonists to provide housing for British troops which was uncomfortable for the colonists because they did not want Redcoats in their homes. On March 5, 1770, a crowd of townspeople were protesting Britain’s actions regarding the colonies. They attacked ten redcoats who opened fired on them killing or wounding eleven colonists. The Boston Massacre was proof of how unhappy the colonists were and the dangerous results it could lead to, yet Britain did not take the hint. In April 1775, a British commander in Boston sent troops to Lexington to seize colonial gunpowder and to capture the rebel colonists, Samuel Adams and John Hancock.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boston Tea Party Analysis

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This meeting was to decide what would be done about the tea tax and it was held on December 16th 1773 at the Old South Meeting House. Francis Rotch along with Samuel Adams and thousands of people from Boston and the surrounding areas gathered in hopes of gaining the permission for the Dartmouth to leave Boston without unloading the East India Company tea cargo. Hutchinson denied their request and the peoples demands were not met. This caused and outrage among the American Colonist, words resonated throughout the meeting house for the Sons of Liberty to carry out their rebellious plan of attack. “They muster 'd I 'm told, upon Fort Hill, to the number of about two hundred, and proceeded, two by two, to Griffin 's wharf, where Hall, Bruce, and Coffin lay, each with 114 chests of the ill fated article on board…” Andrews describes here the amount of participants gathering on Fort hill and marching down like soldiers ready to attack the ships which he refers to by the captain’s last names.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This day became known as the Boston or Bloody Massacre, on which three men were killed and more were wounded. This event jeopardized the ties between Britain and the colonies. The colonists would not stand for this unfair treatment much longer. John Adams wrote about the treatment of the British towards the colonists saying “ Nothing but equal Liberty and kind Treatment can secure the attachment of the Colonies to Britain.” (Doc 2).…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Adams wrote that the, “foundation of American Independence was laid” on the day of the Boston Massacre17. . The ultimate victory of the Boston Massacre was the eventual removal of the British soldiers from the area, and the escalation of protests and resistance by the colonists towards British rule, such as the 1773 Boston Tea Party18. The Boston Massacre was the significant event that led to the rebellion that followed, the Revolutionary…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Was the Boston massacre really a massacre? Or was it something else? Consider if the soldiers were justified or not in firing into the crowd? Did they have sufficient cause to fire into the crowd? Before we answer these questions, we need to know what set the stage for this bloodshed or as history calls it “Boston Massacre.”…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays