The Boston Massacre Analysis

Improved Essays
The Boston Massacre and subsequent Coercive Acts have long been a focal point in the story of the American Revolution. Over the years it has become common place for historians to argue on the impact that the event had on the colonials and their seemingly inevitable movement toward war. The HBO series John Adams is by no means a historical documentary, taking liberty with the accuracy of some of its material in the name of dramatic gravitas. Director Tom Hooper sets out to show the Boston Massacre with a sense of realism even when falsifying specific details. Hooper’s goal in doing so is to provide both a semi-realistic portrayal of the events, but also of the people of Boston’s general growing outlook toward British duties. Hooper provides …show more content…
Hooper makes it a point to show that the town’s folk did harass the soldiers, trial witnesses, and customs officials. The point of showing these scenes is to convince the notion of neutrality by the main protagonist of John Adams. Adam’s faces a great challenge with the court proceedings as he was in many ways in agreeance with his fellow colonists over the tax laws and is shown as being distraught after returning home from the sight of the massacre. However Hooper makes it clear that Adams is a man who believes in the ‘rule of law’ seemingly doing what no one else would do in representing the soldiers, even if only after hearing their version of the events. John Adams clearly faced a host of challenges and bias surrounding the case and is shown to expertly find witnesses in Mr. Holmes and Richard Palms who contradict the accounts of the prosecution. In reality there were more witnesses who under no pressure (this in contradiction to what was depicted in the show), gave testimony in favor of the defense (Roth, 1). In John Adam’s Summation of Defense it is stated …show more content…
He succeeded by using a neutral perspective of John Adam’s to convey both injustices of the colonists during the trials and the injustices of British restrictions following protests. Many of the inaccuracies were used in an effort to further dramatize the events and in doing so does place certain characters and events out of historical reality, but in most cases the end results were largely unaffected. Future portrayals should focus on the full truth of the subject as in many cases what a viewer sees can become their interpretation of the events whether correct or false. History itself should be dramatic enough as it lies and can provide amazing tales without the need of alteration. However in the case of the show John Adams the viewer is able to grasp the realistic message that neither side was perfect, but more importantly they were clearly ideologically different people. Establishing this notion can make it easy to grasp how to similar peoples could become so

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Last Night, March 5, 1770, 5 colonists were either brutally murdered, or killed to contain the crowd. Were the soldiers guilty of manslaughter, or rightfully killing? Restraining the colonists, or trigger-happy? Or the bigger question; Guilty or Innocent? The answer to that question is innocent.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To Whom it May Concern at the Boston Gazette: The colonists are to blame for the Boston Massacre, because they have provoked the British to open fire by forming a mob, through taunts, and by the uncertainty of who was saying fire. First, the colonists have attempted to portray an act of violence without any provocation, which got matters complicated. According to the report of Captain Preston, the colonist “[assembled together] to attack the troops, and [they rang] the bells…as the signal for that purpose and not for fire”. Additionally, someone “ [sounded] the alarm bells, [under the normal routine for] fire. This means that the colonists used a normal sign of warning to gather the people to attack the soldiers, for they used an underhanded technique to catch the soldiers off-guard.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A massacre is known to be a brutal and indiscriminate slaughter of unimpeachable people therefore the use of the word massacre for this event is ambiguous, in truth, the Boston massacre should have been classified as a little dispute, brawl, or riot between mother country and colonies owing to the facts that; all the propaganda that was printed emphasized and exaggerated the actual actions taken by both the colonists and the British, the colonists made the first move, and the British only used what is known as self defense to protect themselves from harm. Biased opinions often affect how people tend to tell their side of the story to others, likewise, the colonists used propaganda as a way to gain sympathy and put the fault of the fight…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The boston Massacre was not a spur of the moment kind of thing. There had been tension between the British and Colonist for a while. The Colonist think that the British have been abusing their power and using it for putting many taxes over the colonies. There was many debates on British taxes, especially the navigation and sugar act. As the British kept piling on taxes the Colonies had enough and finally decide to have the protest which led to the Boston Massacre.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The citizens of Boston didn't have guns or swords, they had to use rocks in snowballs, and sticks to fight the soldiers back(“The Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770”). In the text, it states that Mr. Samuel Grey was killed on the spot when a snowball entered his head damaging a large portion of his skull. Soldiers showed no mercy and shot an innocent African American citizen causing death to the man(“The Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770”). If that one drunk soldier wouldn't have used his sword on that little boy, it could've prevented a lot of deaths. Otherwise, they were to blame for the incidents just by using a deadly weapon first.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The widely known Boston massacre was one of the most iconic events that helped shape our United States of America. On March 5, 1770 eight British soldiers will fire onto a crowd on Kingś street killing five colonists and injuring many more. I do not believe Captain Preston or his men are to blame for firing among what turned into a rioting mob. Throughout this paper I will prove Captain Preston and his British soldiers are not guilty of murder but instead acted in self defence against an unlawful mob. William Sawyer a Boston citizen describes what he witnessed in ¨Eyewitness accounts of the Boston Massacre (1770)¨ He states that “The people kept huzzaing.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ‘Boston massacre’ was more of a tragedy or self defence by the British soldiers in a way that the colonist brought murder to their own people. Although we know this event for a bloodbath caused by british soldiers, there is enough evidence to prove it was not their wrong. If the colonist were not throwing snowballs or insulting the soldiers we would not have this date as a major event in history. As the crowd grew bigger it caused the British soldiers to panic. The red coats were innocent, and would have been at fault in any way they would have handled the situation; either by the court or their captain.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first shot was fired, one was already dead and in a moments notice eleven colonists were shot and five colonists killed by British soldiers. The British had done it, they had created the Boston Massacre. The increase on taxes and the Quartering Act put in place by the British, made the colonists outraged and that led them to protest against Great Britain. A major action that the colonists took was the Boston Tea Party, this was when the Sons of Liberty disguised themselves as Indians and went on multiple ships to dump out all the tea to protest the taxes. The colonists also took the action of putting tar and chicken feathers on British tax collectors to show disapproval of taxation.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the burning of “Liberty,” many brawls took place and the Boston Massacre was at the tip of it all. On March 5, 1770, British troops fired into a crowd of rioting patriots and killed five American civilians (Alchin). This was a really big deal and actually ended up helping the Sons of Liberty take down British control over the colonies in the future. Several patriots, including Samuel Adams and Paul Revere, used the Boston Massacre as an extreme piece of political propaganda meant to excite antagonism toward British rule. The propaganda did indeed work and contributed to the disapproval of the British regime in America…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lyles 1Kayla LylesMr. NewellResearch paperMay 15 2016Bostonian ReliabilityWhen researching many sources written about the Boston massacre, there were severalauthors who issued articles about the Boston Massacre, particularly journals, letter andreferences. Some authors categorized the Boston massacre by its context in history by examiningit by the people who were involved in the important event. However, while the authors talk aboutjournals, letters and references, there really wasn’t much discussion about other important part ofthe Boston Massacre: who really caused it. The goal in this research paper is this BostonMassacre debate is by explaining how it was the colonist fault for causing the Boston massacrebecause they resulted in the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This day became known as the Boston or Bloody Massacre, on which three men were killed and more were wounded. This event jeopardized the ties between Britain and the colonies. The colonists would not stand for this unfair treatment much longer. John Adams wrote about the treatment of the British towards the colonists saying “ Nothing but equal Liberty and kind Treatment can secure the attachment of the Colonies to Britain.” (Doc 2).…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Was the Boston massacre really a massacre? Or was it something else? Consider if the soldiers were justified or not in firing into the crowd? Did they have sufficient cause to fire into the crowd? Before we answer these questions, we need to know what set the stage for this bloodshed or as history calls it “Boston Massacre.”…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Adams wrote that the, “foundation of American Independence was laid” on the day of the Boston Massacre17. . The ultimate victory of the Boston Massacre was the eventual removal of the British soldiers from the area, and the escalation of protests and resistance by the colonists towards British rule, such as the 1773 Boston Tea Party18. The Boston Massacre was the significant event that led to the rebellion that followed, the Revolutionary…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many accounts regarding The Boston Massacre support Samuel Drowne’s interpretation of this event. Samuel Drowne claims he saw a person on the Custom-House balcony holding something that looked like a gun, moments later he saw the gun flash. After shots were fired, the unknown man went back inside, stooping and Drowne then saw a flash from another window. While the shooting in the house was going on, below soldiers were firing in to the crowd in random directions, killing 5 people. Drowne then goes on to describe how the shooting began, Captain Preston said to the soldiers “Damn our bloods!…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the film it never mentions Josiah Quincy and in the film, the trial begins immediately after the Boston massacre, rather than seven months later. Also in the film all the men were acquitted but in the actual account two of the men were guilty of manslaughter. John Adams was a brave man for taking on that trial and while its impossible to speculate why he defended those men it is fair to say that he did it out of honor and he won a fair trial “The Part I took in Defense of Cptn. Preston and the Soldiers, procured me Anxiety, and Obloquy enough. It was, however, one of the most gallant, generous, manly and disinterested Actions of my whole Life, and one of the best Pieces of Service I ever rendered my Country.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays