President trump's decision to pardon sheriff “Joe Arpaio” is considered an absolute nightmare. Adaption has caused several significant mesmerizing events in the time he served as the county's sheriff. These significant events involve how Arpaio “indiscriminately targeted Latinos and detained them without evidence they had broken the law” (Carrie Johnson, Section 2). I disagree with the ability of the president to pardon people convicted of federal crimes. I believe Arpaio made several bad intentions; therefore the crime convicted should have a consequence leading on to that. Not only that but he has affected the lives of countless hispanic families and brought them apart without hesitation. In my opinion , when one is convicted of
…show more content…
Many families , mainly Hispanic suffered through a family separation under the power of Arpaio; some could not afford a meal or live under the same condition because of the family member who maintained them was simply gone. Others lived under fear within their home and in public knowing he could deport them at any given time. Trump pardoning Arpaio basically gave him permission and the ability to view what he had done as something that is not an issue. Which in many standards is an immense issue. It would have inclusively been much better for president trump to wait until he was sentenced and commute the sentence due to various conclusions. Sheriff Joe knew the federal crime he was under. Nevertheless, a prison sentence is fair enough for all the damage he has caused. A commutation would considerably be a bonus and a benefit as to shortening his prison sentence. The pardon allows “wiping a person's criminal record clean entirely, requiring another judicial step, called expungement.” (Carrie Johnson, Section 7). This allows him one step closer as to having a clean record. Considering he is a senior citizen, a conviction being placed into his record would not have a harsh impact towards him due to his retirement. Overall, the ability of president trump to pardon those convicted of crimes should not be
Many families , mainly Hispanic suffered through a family separation under the power of Arpaio; some could not afford a meal or live under the same condition because of the family member who maintained them was simply gone. Others lived under fear within their home and in public knowing he could deport them at any given time. Trump pardoning Arpaio basically gave him permission and the ability to view what he had done as something that is not an issue. Which in many standards is an immense issue. It would have inclusively been much better for president trump to wait until he was sentenced and commute the sentence due to various conclusions. Sheriff Joe knew the federal crime he was under. Nevertheless, a prison sentence is fair enough for all the damage he has caused. A commutation would considerably be a bonus and a benefit as to shortening his prison sentence. The pardon allows “wiping a person's criminal record clean entirely, requiring another judicial step, called expungement.” (Carrie Johnson, Section 7). This allows him one step closer as to having a clean record. Considering he is a senior citizen, a conviction being placed into his record would not have a harsh impact towards him due to his retirement. Overall, the ability of president trump to pardon those convicted of crimes should not be