Jimmy Morris Socrates Analysis

Improved Essays
Jimmy Morris

Plato was a student of the philosopher Socrates. Although Plato was not the favorite of Socrates, he quietly sat and recorded Socrates’ words and ideas. Thus, when Socrates was executed for claimed “corruption of the youth” and “impiousness,” Plato continued where Socrates left off. Plato believed that we can actually get answers to the questions “what is virtue?” and what is justice?” So Plato came up with a very complex yet surprisingly digestible Theory of the Forms. Plato believed that it is possible to find a true being of virtue or just, that is, you can find its form. Plato believed that all things have a true being. According to Plato, the world we live in is an imperfect replica of the real world. Our world, the material word, is constantly undergoing change and we rely on our senses to understand what is going on. We see cats and dogs die, chairs fall apart, and fruit rot. Even human beings are in a constant state of change. For example, a person is not the same person he or she was five years ago, five months ago, or even five
…show more content…
Imagine there are three different types of pears. Each pear is in a different state of decay. What do these pears have in common that makes them distinctly pears instead of, for instance, plumbs? There is an underlying sense of pear-ness to them that makes each of these things distinctly pear. What we may call “pear-ness” is what Plato calls the true form or essence of pears. There is only one former essence of pears and this one form is what forms the many that is seen on earth. Also the form of the pear is unchanging and eternal whereas the pears themselves are simply appearances of the true form of pears. There is ultimately no such thing as a perfect pear in the material world, they are all just imperfect reflections of the form of pears. As human beings, we can recognize the forms because we were born with a dim recollection of them from our prior existence in the world of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Plato also explains how individuals and the Forms are related through the Allegories of the Sun and the Cave. The world, he says, is split up into two realms: the visible and the intelligible. The visible realm is made up of everything that is tangible and able to be perceived by our humanly senses. The intelligible world is made up of the Forms or in other words, the abstract, unchanging absolutes like Goodness and Beauty that exist in the universe. They are objects of wisdom that possess unchanging truths that the rational part of our minds set out to fully comprehend.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The imperfection argument is an argument for both the existence of forms and the concept of a priori. Plato uses this argument as the base of the imperfection of sensible objects and our ability to make judgments about the sensible objects. The basic idea is that we can’s abstract the concept of beauty, from our sense-experience of the objects around us that are beautiful. The imperfection argument goes as follows: 1. “We perceive sensible objects to be equal.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A man of principle, Socrates stood by his word even when facing death. However, this prideful unyielding arrogance led to his downfall. Though today we regard him as a progressive, his shocking contrarian…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of reality and then there’s the world of forms. Plato’s philosophy can be broken down to simply this. The world of reality are the imperfect imagines, such as the raw, ugly, and well normal to us. This is the reality we…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Allegory of the Cave Project You have never really thought about life in general until something comes along and makes you question your very existence. When we first went over the Allegory of the Cave, I did not know what to think. It is a very different way to look at life. I probably never would have even thought about if I had not taken this Intro to Philosophy class.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ith all three of the Hellenistic philosophies in my approach in life. Some I may not agree with their teaching views but for the most part I agree with their philosophies on life in general. These two philosophers had almost similar views on life in general. Diogenes and Zeno teaching were related to the teaching of Jesus in a way. But as for Epicurus, I agree somewhat of his views but for the most part I don’t agree with his teachings.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unlike his mentor Plato, Aristotle believed that the essence of all beings is Substance. Substance is the first principle of all things, according to Aristotle (VII, 1). The philosopher defines substance as that which cannot be predicated, but that “of which all else is predicated” (VII, 3). Everything else, such as matter, qualities of the matter, and etc., proceed substance. And in order to come to these conclusions about the essence of the world, Aristotle uses the methods of scientific inquiry, experimentation, and deductive reasoning.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding Plato’s Form of the Good can be very challenging. However, by understanding the hierarchy of Forms and the difference between the sensible and intelligible world we can make sense of Plato’s ideas. To start, we need to remember that Plato believed that everything we see around us is only an imitation of true objects. Before we were born our souls roamed the World of Forms.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s, The Trials and Death of Socrates, Socrates is the ultimate cause of his own death because of not conforming to the democracy of the Athenians and corrupting the young. Socrates was a wise philosopher of his time and was in search of the truth, rather than believing in the Athenians Gods. Nevertheless, it was more than just a simple search for Socrates. His search for the truth turned into a complex journey to where the answer of true wisdom leads Socrates to be brought up on charges of corrupting society. He taught his philosophy of life on the streets to anyone who cared to listen.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, Socrates is still unsure; he still believes that the soul could be one entity rather than split into three. So to prove it he states that each part of the soul…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Further into the reading, Socrates responds to Simmias’ argument by stating that a harmony cannot be separate from a lyre, whereas the soul is not under control by the body, and if they said the soul was like a lyre they would contradict themselves and Homer (Plato 30, 31). Cebes also uses an analogy about a man and a coat. Cebes believes that like a man, the soul could be destroyed by wearing out (Plato 25). However, this objection is not very strong and is easily dismissed by Socrates. After more proof is given to Simmias and Cebes, the two both agree with Socrates’ argument about the existence of the soul, and the composition and simplicity…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to show that human’s soul is plurality, Socrates uses the principle of opposites – a single thing is never characterized by opposites at the same time, in relation to the same thing, and in the same respect. Since this principle must be true, it is impossible for one thing to be conflicted. Sometimes, it appears that a thing is beautiful and ugly at the same time; whenever such situation occurs, it must mean that there is more than one thing. For example, there will be no contradiction if a chair is beautiful and ugly at the same time, as long as it is beautiful in respect to its form and ugly in respect to its color. Otherwise, a chair must be either purely beautiful or purely ugly.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    When attempting to solve the problem concerning the immortality of the soul, both Plato and Hume must rely on analogy. Plato, being a rationalist, argues that the soul is immortal and is comparable to a form, for it is invisible and incomposite, unlike material objects. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the soul is mortal and compares souls to perishable objects such as bodies. Although neither analogy can offer any validity, Hume 's argument for the mortality of the soul is far more compelling than Plato 's opposing argument.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays