Jimmy Carter Oil Pipeline Analysis

Decent Essays
In 2003 Jimmy Carter made an essay attempting to persuade the american public not to build a pipe-line through an Arctic Wildlife Reserve. Let's take a look at how he tried to persuade his audiences. First, to give the audience a sense of trustworthiness, and dependability, he describes how he went to this amazing land, that must be protected, known as the arctic. Next, he argues his case claiming that if we build an oil pipeline there will only be short term benefits, and that we are destroying this beautiful sanctuary. Finally he connects the audience, not just the people who will visit the area, but every American by claiming that this victory is not just a victory for himself, but for everyone.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Water is an economic good, but it is so much more than that: It is the basis of all life, not just human. It is integral to the health and beauty of Canada’s landscape. It is the key to our past and future. If this, the last and greatest natural resource still in Canadian hands is traded away, we are a lesser people, sovereign in name only,” says Paul Cellucci, former U.S. ambassador to Canada. As dramatic as his statement may seem, he brings up various important points that may be overlooked in this issue.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also in the article Should the United States Authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to Import Tar Sand Oil from Canada, it talks about how, "Indigenous peoples (known as First Nations) in Canada are taking the lead to stop the largest industrial project on Mother Earth: the Tar Sands Gig project. Northern Alberta is ground zero with over 20 corporations operating in the tar sands sacrifice zone, with expanded developments being planned. The cultural heritage, land, ecosystems and human health of First Nation communities... are being sacrificed for oil money in what has been termed a 'slow industrial genocide'. Infrastructure projects linked to the tar sands expansion such as... the Keystone XL pipeline, threaten First Nation communities in British…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jimmy Carter writes, “tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge,” to describe what industrialization will do to the Arctic National Wildlife refuge. The general argument in Carter’s forward is that this Arctic refuge should not be developed for industry. First, he uses facts and evidence to build his claim. Then he uses word choice and imagery to support his argument. His purpose is to persuade his audience that development will have negative consequences for the Arctic refuge, in order to protect this unique awe inspiring wildlife refuge.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a foreword to Subhankar Banerjee's book, former President Jimmy Carter makes an argument against allowing drilling and industrial activity in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In his defence of his position, Carter effectively uses a combination of factual evidence, style, and appeals to emotion to persuade the reader of his ideas. Carter starts the foreword off by describing a time when he went to the Arctic Refuge with his wife, and recounting all of the Refuge's natural beauty, from the "brilliant mosaic" of plant life to the "spectacle" of caribou migration. This use of imagery helps create the feeling that the Arctic Refuge is sacred and beautiful, and therefore deserving of protection; this is a form of emotional appeal; his description of this in the form of a narrative also makes him feel more genuine and relatable.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keystone Pipeline

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Bill McKibben’s article, “Why Dakota Is the New Keystone,” expresses how Native Americans want to live peacefully without their history and culture in danger of this pipeline. The United States Army verses Native Americans is a big point in this article. McKibben clearly states how this battle has gone on for a while now and has caused a tremendous amount of damage. “The shocking images of the National Guard destroying tepees and sweat lodges and arresting elders”.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Keystone Politics By Garrett Kizior History of the Keystone Pipeline Canada’s Athabasca River Basin is the home of one of the world’s largest stockpile of fossil fuels; bitumen. Bitumen, which lies beneath prehistoric boreal forests and peat bogs, is composed of oil, sand, and clay, and is often compared to thick tar. Because of its composition, bitumen is commonly referred to as tar sands The only method to remove the tar sands from the ground is to first inject hot steam into the earth until the bitumen melts and then carry it to the surface with heavy machinery. Once above ground, converting bitumen to fuel can consume as much energy as it provides. Even though the costs involved in drilling the tar sands are high and the ultimate energy…

    • 2525 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Erika Anderson once said “Doing the right thing doesn’t automatically bring success, but compromising almost always leads to failure.”. During the 1980’s to the 2000’s many citizens of the United States were faced with an ethical issue, this issue caused many of them to compromise what was wrong and what was right. Around the 1980’s the U.S was having trouble producing its own oil and wanted to drill for oil near an Alaskan wildlife refuge known as Arctic National Wildlife Refuge(ANWR). Although some Americans thought this was okay there were many reasons why this should not happen. These reasons included environmental pollution, harm to wildlife, as well as the consumption rates of oil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “America has always been known to force their cultural opinions on many cultures besides their own, compelling them to revolt against the continuing oppression of American“ - India Cage I almost wrote a short story about the struggle to revolt against the construction of an oil pipeline that has threatened to be built on an Native American reserve but instead of sticking to what my teacher would want at the beginning of my persuasive writing. I choose to not only write about the disappointment that I feel towards my fellow Americans who agree to such a horrible thing to be built on a reserve, which is against this pipeline to even be constructed. I choose to write because it is in my right to express my opinion towards this situation and to think there are people out there who have hate in their heart, who only cares about the profit that will be made and not the innocent people they could hurt. It is still a mystery how many Americans believe it should be built despite the disagreement of many Native Americans, doesn’t this sound familiar America? When Americans first came here and…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most widely debated topics, in recent years, is the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. The completion of the project has been done in multiple phases and one of the last phases scheduled to be completed is the phase 4 extension. This extension would create a pipeline that would trek, around 2000 miles, from Alberta Canada to the gulf coast of Texas (Friends of the Earth). Since the pipeline would cross international borders, approval from congress would be necessary in order to begin construction (NPR). The two main issue points on the topic are the economic gains that could incur from the development of the pipeline and the overall impression on the environment that would ensue from extraction, transportation, and refining of the oil.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Carter sets forth a very compelling case for preserving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This is quite an important issue as noted by this former President and gives interesting personal details to further his arguments. He uses his vast experience in dealing with complex issues such as the environment to make his point that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should remain untouched. Considering the evidence first mentioned in this passage, the President uses his personal experiences and his powerful usage of diction to show the reader how important the issue of protecting the environment truly is. Very descriptive details of the beauty of this land are found throughout his essay.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As much as I enjoyed reading anatomy books, I broadened my horizons and expanded my interests in areas such as political science, crime cases, debates, issues in the economy- you name it, and I read it. These were only a few of the many subjects that I devoured to satisfy my hunger for information and fill my personal library of knowledge. Through research, I opened my mind to current events, and figuratively brought me to places in the world I have never traveled. Recently, the topic “Should we extend the Keystone XL Pipeline to transport more crude oil from Canada into America?” came to mind and mind spun with ideas about the Canadian ecosystem, the shoreline, and the increase in jobs if we extend the Pipeline; concluding that.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened doors to the insecurities of the Canada- U.S. relationship as well as questioned the rhetoric of the energy policy of the United States (Kalen 5). Many people were torn as to whether the risk of the pipeline would outweigh its potential benefits. There were concerns of the environment as well as the effect on gas prices (Terry 61-62). The advocates of this pipeline suggested it would secure borders as well as benefit the economy immensely (Slade 28). Although the pipeline would represent just a small portion of the 2.6 million miles of oil pipelines that currently exist, many have aggressively debated this topic for an extensive amount of time (“Keystone” 1).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays