Ferguson,” National Archives). John Howard Ferguson was the judge hearing the case. Although in a previous case Ferguson had found the Separate Car Act unconstitutional for interstate travel, Ferguson ruled against Plessy in this district court because he found that the act was constitutional if it only applied to trains running within Louisiana. Plessy then “applied to the State Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition and certiorari” (“Plessy v. Ferguson,” National Archives). The reason Ferguson’s name appears in the title of this court case is because he was named in the petition to the Louisiana State Supreme Court (“Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court.”). The State Supreme Court ruled that the law was constitutional, but it also granted Plessy a “writ of error” so that he could appeal the case to the United States Supreme Court (our
Ferguson,” National Archives). John Howard Ferguson was the judge hearing the case. Although in a previous case Ferguson had found the Separate Car Act unconstitutional for interstate travel, Ferguson ruled against Plessy in this district court because he found that the act was constitutional if it only applied to trains running within Louisiana. Plessy then “applied to the State Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition and certiorari” (“Plessy v. Ferguson,” National Archives). The reason Ferguson’s name appears in the title of this court case is because he was named in the petition to the Louisiana State Supreme Court (“Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court.”). The State Supreme Court ruled that the law was constitutional, but it also granted Plessy a “writ of error” so that he could appeal the case to the United States Supreme Court (our