Evolving With The Values Of Kaplan And Heschel

Improved Essays
Jewish education has the goal to make a contribution to modern times by making tradition applicable. For Kaplan, it is not enough to blindly accept the culture in which we live, rather we must question and evolve. To evolve with our values is not to say that the values themselves are changing in their essential meaning. Evolving with our values specifically points to the idea that we must have an eternal concern with relating our understanding of our values with the values of society, and choosing our actions based on this interaction. It is not enough to simply walk around and only have concern for how our personal actions will affect our personal lives. This transitive concern for our affect on the world enforces a cycle of action and of observation in tandem with one another.
Heschel stresses that freedom is not the freedom to act frivolously without regard for others; freedom is not to act as one desires. Freedom is a challenge against impulse. Impulse guides people to act with a dangerous amount of freedom when not they are not aware of the effect that freedom can have. The fact of having freedom means that we must use our freedom and our power to attain value in our lives. Heschel also argues for the protection
…show more content…
They are both facing each other, eager to understand the other, yet at the same, ready to point out the others flaws in their arguments. Heschel is poignant in his argument about the goal of Jewish education. He argues that the goal is to enable students participate and share in the spiritual experience of Jewish living. The goal for Heschel is to not just to have knowledge, but also to be able to think critically and appreciate the act of studying. Heschel believes that there should be fewer textbooks that guide our actions, and more text people, meaning people who are able to interpret and react to what they are studying and will make decisions and perform based on their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    We need to make the world fit around us rather than try to fit into the world. Thoreau gives the tools in which we can achieve this; autonomy and by exploring our minds. Thought I concede that being independent from society’s views and rules is important and necessary, I think that is impossible or very difficult to acquire or assert real individuality in today’s society. Currently, being unique and individualistic is the trend which poses the question, is it trying to be individualistic really being nonconformist in today’s society? However, whether this is able or not is not as important as to attempt to achieve that state of mind.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paradox Of Freedom

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Paradox of freedom Freedom is the power or right that enables someone to act, speak or think according to personal interest without hindrance or experiencing resistance. In connection to the freedom, it requires to be controlled whereby having freedom does not automatically prove one if free. Freedom is also associated and connected to some level of fundamental obligations. It requires one to use freedom wisely as it comes with responsibilities. The paradox of freedom is the essence of obligations that comes with freedom whereby involved person has to ensure they are maintained.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They define our reactions to certain impulses and situations and how well we manage anxiety and stress. Although defenses are there for our protection, they can become dangerous when someone refuses to face their previous experiences, feelings, or behaviors. This can lead to deeper psychological issues that our defense mechanisms cannot control. Therefore, we must take caution in the way our defense mechanisms are exercised so that they are used for their original intent of reducing anxiety, and do not create a larger…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hard Work Research Paper

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Convincing yourself that everything will work out may alleviate stress, however, it takes away your freedom to act upon your circumstances. Likewise living life in a pessimistic way is unhealthy. A little pessimism can be good, but living life expecting the worst of everything cannot be a good way to live. I argue that instead, we should take control of our own destinies. Instead of living pessimistically or optimistically, we should make our own views.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With free will it holds the people communicating responsible for what they say and do because it was their own choice to act out those actions or say what they did. While with determinism your words and actions are already predetermined based on heredity and environment. Thus, affecting communication because in that theory people cannot be held responsible for their words and actions because they did not choose them, they were already predetermined for them. These are important in communication theory because the different theory you believe in would have a different effect on how you hold other people responsible while communicating with them. These are important to understand, especially in interpersonal relationships.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the proper conduct is on how an individual should act whenever they are participating in society. Due to the fact that some people cause harm and cannot be punished by law, Mill explains that the opinion and judgment by society is enough for punishment. This causes some notable problems because in fact, it may not be enough punishment for an individual, especially if they continue to cause injury to others. Also, the author encourages public scrutiny and criticism of the individual causing harm. Whenever society gains jurisdiction, they can disclose their opinion of an individual and warn others of the potential danger that they may cause.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let alone not being able to make individual choices, choices are being made for them in which the end result is not of their liking. The individuals are not getting a chance to make decisions based on the collective good, especially when they have the ability to do so. For Mill, freedom is the absence of coercion. He believes that individuals should not interfere in the choices of others. The freedom of speech and action is essential for progress and development in the human society.…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are the reasons I incline toward Nietzsche 's slavish revolt in morality. Furthermore, his thoughts of complete freedom can be hazardous if miscomprehended; they possess the complete obligation too. I think it is legitimately that freedom of moral decision obliges responsibility and the other way around. Nietzsche doesn 't call to prematurely end every single moral standard and regulations to my psyche. He simply needs individuals to go on the larger amount where the Moral standards are the piece of internal nature (Overman) and not as directed by the great power.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stepping On Jesus Analysis

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is crucial that students should discharge from being worried of their judgments go against the judgments society wants us to have. It is vital to use critical thinking and upright decision making to acquire the ideal result. The process a delicate and often difficult one. It involves a close consideration or critically thinking, of all the concerns not within yourself, but the community as a whole. Some wrongly believe that this means basically doing what is right, but then the judgment making is not grounded on critical thinking and morals but one’s personal opinions and does not keep in standards with the ethical procedures that governs social…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition’s motive against this position would to remove the one or the other, not both. Another issue is determinism failing to explain twists such as someone who seemed very likely to make one choice, but ended up choosing the latter. These types of oddities would make determinism’s faulty nature unappealing while making free will more favorable when both should have equal consideration. Use of determinism also has a negative affect on motivation, causing people to put less effort into difficult tasks (Vohs…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays