The source of the dispute is that Dazzling Dough believes they have fulfilled the purchaser’s order as agreed in the contract, and the buyers Jerry’s Pizza believes that they did not receive their complete order that was stated in the contract.
Dazzling Pizza believes they are following the contract that was created. The contract states Jerrys Pizza will purchase 200 pounds of pizza dough, pizza toppings, desserts and soft drinks for $30,000. The contract was presented to Jerry’s pizza, and they signed.
Jerry’s Pizza believes that they were shorted 75 pounds of pizza dough, and contacted Dazzling Pizza about the error, the order that arrived consisted of 125 pounds of pizza dough, 75 pounds of pizza toppings, desserts and soft drinks. Jerry’s pizza agreed to purchase 200 pounds of pizza dough and was only provided 125 pounds of pizza dough.
Dazzling Pizza’s interpretation could be reasonable if the contract was stating that the 200 pounds is including the toppings, drinks and desserts. Rather than the pizza dough being separate.
Jerry’s Pizza interpretation could be reasonable if the contact Cleary states the 200 pounds of pizza …show more content…
Maintaining trust, and not sharing private information in relation to the company’s recipes or ingredients. Additionally, terms of breach of contract. Markgraf (n.d.) suggests the following when creating a business contract, “Determine prices ethically, avoid conflicts of Interest, Competing Fairly, and Observing Laws and Regulations” (pg. 1). Creating the terms of a potential breach of contract will set standards and eliminate further questions, the statement should be specific and clear. Factors such as company closure, or in the event of emergency and financial struggles should be discussed as