Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Quote Analysis

Improved Essays
Sigmund Freud’s quote meant that a civilization is unable to survive if the people in that civilization are mistreated, done wrong, abandoned etc. That also, that a law once made cannot be broken by individuals wrong doings, and the law should not be treated with violent force. Which, can stand for any society, nation, and/or country; must have equally for every person living in that civilization, and that one person should not get treated either better or worse than the next: fairness for all. The people of that society/nation/country will stand up and fight for their rights and freedom, and rebel against any government, king, dictators, and pretty much anyone that’s leading that civilization. The quote is saying this also: that justice will be …show more content…
Jean-Jacques Rousseau would agree with Sigmund Freud’s quote because Rousseau also believed in making sacrifices for the general good as the individual, and that what you give you should receive. “Rousseau advocated the elimination of the political despotism, and introduced a new social order in which only the authority of the “general will” of the governed placed limits on individual freedom” (57). Rousseau wanted the same thing as Freud; the people come first, and it should continue to be that way if that ruler wanted to continue to rule over that civilization. Freud and Rousseau both agree the existence of a civilization can only happen if, the people shift their rights over to civil rights; in order for that society to maintain. Rousseau's social contract formed two branches that he believed in which were as follows: sovereign and a government, and he chosen these two because there should be a separation between the voice of the law (citizens acting as a whole collectively) and the executive power of the state (the government, which takes care of the day-to-day

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Denica @ Myat Thazin Khine Block – D 8 / 24 /2015 Journal-C: Question 2 Lord of the Flies is a novel, representing the weakness of man’s enterprises, showing us how men are born savages at heart, and the fact that corruption of men had nothing to do with civilization. J.J Rousseau had once said that “Nothing can be more gentle than man in his primitive state.” According to his statement, Rousseau believed that all men are born innocent, gentle and guiltless but eventually turned malevolence and savage within the years of living in the civilized world. In his eyes, he supposed that the existence of science and arts in our humanity had ultimately corrupted people from improving themselves.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for the social contract to succeed and for people to live happily together, laws are created and shall be obeyed and respected by the citizens as well as by the government and rulers. Laws are what the citizens desire the most in a state; ultimately they are recorded as what the citizens hope the state shall provide them. Rousseau believes that those rules and laws are the soul of the state. The beauty of rules is that people would obey them yet lose…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be virtuous means to have high moral standards; to be righteous and honorable. Principle is moral rule or belief that helps one distinguish what is right and wrong. To have power means to have the capability to direct or influence the behavior of others. Virtue and principle go hand in hand, virtue requiring a moral compass and principle providing that said compass, but is that what’s most important? Being morally responsible?…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages

    This essay will be discussing my rights as a citizen and the best form of government that protects these rights to me as a person. Many enlightened thinkers talked about our rights and fought for our rights. Thomas Jefferson, a lawyer wrote The Declaration stating that we should have unalienable rights and the right of life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness , i believe that this is correct and we should have a government like this because it's giving us a right to be happy and that all of us are created equal so nobody looks at themselves and feels like they aren't equal to another person, Also i get that if you take advantage of the rights then you should have them taken away. ( Document E- Thomas Jefferson)…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his article, “Gentle Savages and Fierce Citizens against Civilization: Unraveling Rousseau’s Paradoxes,” author Matthew Mendham further explores Shklar’s work by creating the “Shklarian Model” which is simply split between what is best for a man and what is best for a citizen as being distinct ideals (172). Mendham further elaborates on this argument by explaining the position of Leo Strauss, who argued that Rousseau’s political solution “ought to be read as merely intended for modern consumption” since it is impossible for humans to ever truly return to the ideal solitude and naturalness of the original state of human nature (172). In fact, in his Confessions Rousseau posited that “he alone has maintained the soul of original, natural…

    • 1754 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The specific thoughts of Rousseau and Mill on freedom, the significance of social contracts, individual versus social freedom, and government’s role…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The purpose of law for Rousseau is to communicate the general will of the people. The general will of the people puts the common interest of all involved at the forefront. Whereas in the state of nature there was a sense of inequality, once the social contract is in effect there is equality as everyone is needed for the common good to take place. In order for these laws to be enacted the majority must agree to give up their individual rights for the protection of all. The sovereign hopes to serve the common good while putting private interest last.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau born on June 28, 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland is a philosopher, composer and a writer of the 18th century. His political philosophy inspired the Age of Enlightenment in France and across the Europe. He said he is going to challenge social fabric of the 18th century and will stand up for the people. He considered all people to be good and wise; which led him to work for the benefit of them. He also, argued that the government’s priority should be to protect freedom, equality and justice for all even though the majority rules…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Henceforth, when someone is compelled by other citizens to obey the general will they make that individual realise his true humanity, be a citizen and part of the sovereign. With this claim Rousseau does not leave people another choice than to obey the general law, but more than being ‘forced’ to be free it should be ‘morally compelled’ to be…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke Vs Rousseau

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Among social contract philosophers, John Lock contributed most to the shaping of the modern conception of a liberal democracy. In fact many of the values of liberalism can be traced back to John Locke, in particular, a governmental system that is popular, limited, responsible and representative. Locke argues that in a state of nature, individuals enjoy certain inalienable rights and these rights have to be protected by a governing body. As a result, a social contract stems from a group of people, who striving to protect these inalienable rights, unite and establish a body of government. In this, one can note another liberal ideal: popular government, where the people make the political judgments and select political leaders.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine having the technology to essentially create loving and everlasting love with someone? With a “Love Implant,” couples would have the opportunity to grow stronger bonds with each other just by looking at one another. With one look, the oxytocin the in brain would turn on and create happiness within a relationship. Ideally, this kind of product sounds like a dream come true. Love has been fashioned to be the most incredible and necessary thing in life.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ‘general will’ would now govern the states, taking away one’s natural rights, but gaining them civil liberties. According to Rousseau, the ‘general will’ was when man gave power to the majority and essentially hoped that they would govern correctly. By following the guidelines set out than one would essentially be governing themselves because the guidelines of society are set up with consideration for the ‘general will’. Rousseau valued the idea of people’s sovereignty and for him the state, ‘general will’, laws, and guidelines were…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The people understood that they are the power and centerpiece holding everything together. He also truly enjoyed how the people would come together as a whole to discuss the issues face to face that were happening on all levels from the government to the people. Hobbes was quite the opposite of this however which led Rousseau to maintain such a firm stance with him as well as Grotius. Rousseau’s legacy is based mainly on two concepts found in his work with the idea of the Social Contract Theory. However, the purpose of Rousseau 's philosophy and his approved government is essentially the idea that if all problems are met with the unity of the people and dealt with accordingly using his Social Contract Theory.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, this seems to be a critique of the law of nature, where the strongest are the ones fit to survive, which would follow Natural Law, but not the rules of the Social Contract. Obeying because one is forced to due to the “might” of a ruler is not the same as one obeying because of their moral obligation. Furthermore, he rejects the notion of “might makes right” for the reasoning that God chose the “mighty” to rule and therefore the ruler should be obeyed, as God is the source of the Natural Law, and that goes against the notions of the Social Contract. Natural Law is a point of contention for Rousseau, as he seems to change his opinion of believing it or not depending on which idea will better support his argument. However, he does establish that there was definitely something present for us in our state of nature that we found an equal in with the Social…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays