Jean Jacques Rousseau's Argument

Decent Essays
While taking an intro philosophy class last semester I read many interesting philosophical arguments, but the most interesting was an argument by Jean Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau's argument, or the interesting part of the argument, is called amour-propre; that esteem depends upon the opinion of others. I found this argument to be relevant to what we are discussing now, more specifically how the others opinions and societal pressure impact our ideas of the good life. Although I think that the good life can only be defined by the individual, Rousseau brought up some interesting points about how people cannot derived their own values without the opinions of others. For example, if someone achieves something notice worthy and do not receive notice

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current thesis endeavors to access the notion of “ Nothing is true, everything is permitted.” What is truth? What is so intricately responsible and substantial as to justify the real in depths of truth? Is truth ‘true’? What is ‘true’ then?…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau places a great deal of importance on the common good and therefore somewhat rejects personal freedoms. He believes that in order to be a part of the Social Contract, in which he believes man is free, personal freedom must be ignored. In the state of nature, man is free to indulge in their personal needs and freedoms and therefore must be disregarded in order to unsure the common good. If an individual disagrees with the majority, they are inherently wrong and should be forced to obey the general will. Rousseau states, “whoever refuses to obey the general will will be forced to do so by the entire community” (Rousseau, 150).…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Locke and Rousseau contract greatly regarding inequality. Their theories present different origins of inequality, different notions of whether people agree to it, and different ways in which it should be regulated by political society. According to Locke, there is no limitation on the inequality that may exist within a government. To question his theory, let us assume the following conditions: 1.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    France During the 18th century, new political ideas greatly influenced the French revolution, which was the turning point in French history. Indeed, one of the most important and influential philosophers ever named John Locke (1632-1704) had a profound impact on French thinkers and the revolution. French philosophers of the Enlightenment took Locke as a model. He was the promoter of a political philosophy based on the concept of natural law where all men collectively elect a government to protect their natural rights.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau And Inequality

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Has one ever conjectured what the conception of perfection can lead to? Is excellence or improvement a negative feature that is responsible for the ills of the society? A philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau expressed his comprehension of perfection as a negative aspect is an ill in his essay named, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Rousseau comes to show that excellence tended to create a society that promotes inequality. As the society progressed towards improvement it creates greater tensions among the society.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A popular point of discussion is equality in society because it appears in the everyday life of all individuals. However, it is a difficult point of discussion because there are many factors that play into it. In fact, private property plays a very important key role in the discussion of equality. This is because private property involves both material and monetary items, and these are resources that are fought over on the daily when it comes to equal or fair distribution of wealth. A key question brought up by this is not only what counts as property, but whether or not it is a valuable concept that should be maintained or destroyed in regards to if it suits society’s needs.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When examining the question of whether John Rawls would consider Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s ideal society in the Social Contract fair, it is important to not only understand Rousseau’s ideal society more closely, but also understand what Rawls defines as being fair. First, the society that Rousseau proposes as the ideal one is based off of his concept of the nature of men. Men are born free and it is society that enslaves them, therefore, the goal of his ideal society is one that protects the people while also maintaining them as free as they were in nature. While to many philosophers maintaining security means renouncing some of an individual’s freedom, Rousseau believes that society can have one without the expense of the other. This only happens…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau claims that the precondition of decency in terms of being human and most importantly a citizen is to believe in God. Therefore, he does not separate a place in his ideal state for atheists by accusing them being unsociable. Bayle, on the other hand, is against the notion that while religion makes people moral, atheism makes them immoral. He puts forward other motives of human behavior other than fear or love of divine and claims that an atheist might be virtuous as much as a religious person or maybe even more. In this paper I shall examine Rousseau’s and Bayle’s claims on religion and atheism, then explain why an atheist on contrary to Rousseau’s ideas can make a good citizen.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Second Discourse on Inequality, Jean Jacque Rousseau outlined the origin and development of private property. The formation of the hut is the first step towards the ultimate creation of society as families and communities start to form. Unlike savage man who’s primary motivation was self-preservation, civilized man embraced amour propre as they begin to compare their strengths and abilities of others. Although Rousseau argues that the invention of private property is not natural, it is inevitable as it becomes a necessity due to certain circumstances such as metallurgy and agriculture. Furthermore, the inequalities of property established a division between the wealthy versus the poor and played a significant role in the creation of…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Accomplishments of Jean Jacques Rousseau Jean Jacques Rousseau was one of the few people who could be considered as a jack of all trades. He was a philosopher, author, and composer, and he also dabbled in botany and mathematics. He produced many wonderful works in his lifetime and had made several important contributions to music, literature, and political philosophy. His professional success belied the difficult childhood that he had. His mother died a few days after he was born, and his father later remarried and left him in the care of his uncle.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of freedom in Jean Jacque Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762) is present throughout the book and Rousseau’s own, personal understanding of freedom underpins his argument for his ideal state. In this essay I will argue that individual citizens aren’t truly free in every sense in Rousseau’s state as the sovereign has complete dominion over public matters and due to the sovereign explicitly being composed of every citizen, this could lead to nearly every problem being deemed within the public realm. Furthermore, one cannot be individually free, in my opinion, when one cannot voice dissent against the prevailing convention of society, as is the case in Rousseau’s state. To argue this thesis effectively I will explore what freedom means…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By then, with this romantic love, you are losing your sense of autonomy. You willingly masking yourself for someone else. A life of independence is substituted for a life of pleasing the lover, ultimately losing your own identity. Rousseau believes in the concept that in order to be happy we need to be self-sufficient. Rousseau doesn’t disregard love’s benefits, but acknowledges the fact that it has its consequences, the biggest being the loss of self.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau observes human nature as innately good when it’s extracted from all social attachments and the immensely corrupting overall influence of society itself. Society, for Rousseau in his eyes is a grand impulse where the decencies of human beings are displayed. Rousseau 's political theories are derived from the seemingly simple idea of arranging humans into a social setting that’s bare of corrupting elements of society. Rousseau 's leap toward a social and political order of amour propre over amour de soi is evidence of this. Rousseau derives a substantial amount of his beliefs from morals such as equality.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays