It is only once they join society, start acquiring property and forming relationships that differences and jealousies start to appear. He doesn’t deny that Hobbes’s view may be correct, just that his definition of the actual ‘State of Nature’ is inaccurate. According to Rousseau, the only sentiments left in the ‘State of Nature’ would be self-love and pity, and man would have no desire for power because there would be nobody to …show more content…
A lot of conclusions can be brought from this statement and Rousseau’s and Hobbes’s bear no resemblance. While the former believes that all men give themselves and their rights to the ‘body politic’ and that people ‘’place themselves under the supreme direction of the General Will’’ , the latter argues that all men should give themselves and all their rights to a third party, the sovereign. Hobbes believes that this sovereign stands above society and can punish those who disobey him, the reason why people accept this is because they acquire