Jay Bost The Ethics Of Eating Meat

Improved Essays
Jay Bost begins his essay on the ethics of eating meat by introducing himself as a former vegetarian. He claims that he has given much thought about the ethics of eating meat. His dietary changes were based on ethics. This is why he returned to conscientious meat-eating after being vegetarian and vegan. Bost's ethical reasons behind abstaining from meat were obvious and clear. Nowadays, most animals are raised and killed in cruel conditions. Grain that could feed hungry people feeds animals instead. The need for pasture fuels deforestation. A sentient being must die for people to partake in the consumption of meat (Bost).

However, Bost believes only the last idea applies to all meat available for consumption. Bost's main idea is that any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Flesh of Your Floods”, Foer neither has the authority or experience to write on the topic when most of early childhood and adult life choose not to consume meat, “During high school and college, he converted to vegetarianism several more times, partly to salve his conscience...” (Kolbert 3). If Foer is trying to convince, those who consume meat, to why they should consider dog for dinner is considered to be an opposing argument to his claim. In comparison to Foer demeaning and straight forward tone he seems to very persuasive to change the perception of what both meat lovers and vegetarians consume. Despite using any terms such as “we” or “us” until the very last two pages of the excerpt, Foer lets the reader take an insight on his own stubbornness views that may connect to the audiences when he says, “Can’t we get over our sentimentality?”…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is no doubt that food is the paramount needs for human beings because food provides nutrients for human and without food human can’t survived in the world. In general, there are many different ways to get nutrients such as fruit, vegetable and animals meat but as we live in a developed science and technology society all you need is money, you can buy any food you want even though delivery food to you houses. As the matter of facts, food industries are mass produce food with chemicals that can make the food stay for a period of time and the price attracted for people to buy more and it turns out that meat is more cheaper than vegetables. However, in the essay of “ Against Meat” written by Jonathan Safran Foer, he described his experience of became a vegetarianism and the influence that he…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyone has to eat in order to survive. But where and what are most Americans eating now? In “Against Meat” by Jonathan Safran Foer and “What You Eat Is Your Business” by Radley Balko, the authors try to answer these simple questions. Gone are the days of sitting down with the whole family to a large table laden with food. In today’s world most people are choosing convenience and time saving ways of getting food to the traditional family sit down meal.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1990, author Wendell Berry released an essay titled “The Pleasures of Eating”. The essay focused on the responsibilities of eating, which includes self-awareness regarding what one’s consuming. Berry discusses how to eat responsibly throughout his piece, often citing the hidden dangers of the food industry, which includes the unjustifiable treatment of animals. Berry uses the rhetorical appeals in relation to these matters which allows him to connect and convey his message more strongly toward Americans, especially those living more rural lifestyles.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past century we have seen not only our population skyrocket, but also our technological capacity increase exponentially. My worldview, primarily eco-centric, is focused on the incredible potential of technology to create sustainable harmony between humanity and the earth. We have gotten to a point in our evolution where it will be impossible to revert to our pre-industrial state. Our resources are limited and should not be wasted, this traces back to the fundamental property of the universe: energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be converted between forms. So much matter is wasted and converted into a state in which it is impossible to recover it, and instead of draining the earth we should be focusing on developing inexhaustible…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pleasure people receive from eating meat is far outweighed…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Changing human diet can be a controversial topic and to change this omnivore’s mind one needs to present facts as cold as a fresh cut of meat. Marjorie Lee Garretson’s “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is an essay that tries to persuade the reader to a vegan lifestyle under the guise of vegetarianism using few cited sources and trying to make the reader feel bad about the way they currently eat. “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is a college level essay written by Marjorie Lee Garretson about the potential positives to vegetarian lifestyle. The essay first focuses on the health benefits of switching to vegetarianism which is done in three sentences claiming decreased cancer rates and longer life expectancy without any…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are omnivores, which means that they eat both plants and animals. Ultimately, the human can decide whether or not they are going to consume animal meat. I am analyzing the article “Against Meat” in the They Say I say collection of articles. Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his experiences with his struggles of becoming a vegetarian.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Animal's Place All beings are aware of animal slaughter for food purposes. One may either look away with guilt and still consume meat knowing in fact the process within animal slaughter, or on the crontary, not consume meat at all. Michael Pollan makes several points throughout his journal from “ The New York Times Magazine”, in which he advocates the idea of equality, factory farming, and humane farming. Within his several points, he arrives to a conclusion in which he proclaims that animals’ rights may still be honored during the preparation of the slaughtering of an animal. Equality is one point Pollan shares with his readers, stating that there is not much equality among animals themselves.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, the widespread belief that farming conditions should change or that humans should avoid meat would negatively impact the economy. In the article, “Is there a moral case for meat?”, Nathanael Johnson splits his essay into two parts. In the first part of the article, Johnson tries to find a logical counter…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The daunting question of how anyone could possibly survive without meat has caused controversies throughout history. It is not a foreign concept, but in most circumstances, it is treated like one. In today’s world, there is always seems to…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that meat is a very wasteful use of resources and its clauses hunger and poverty. Studies show that a large amount of grain to feed livestock, this…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays