Jarret Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Analysis

Improved Essays
Garret Hardin is a contemporary philosopher and ecologist famous for his stances on over population and commentary on such issues as “the tragedy of the commons.” Hardin also introduces the philosophy of “Lifeboat Ethics,” and uses it extensively to back up his stances on “the tragedy of the commons.” His belief, in summation, is that the world can be thought of as an ocean and with each affluent nation a lifeboat and each poor nation waiting to get on the life boat. Hardin surmises that it is not the job of the larger nation to share their space on the life boat as it jeopardizes their well-being at the expense of helping nations who do not deserve or are incapable of properly utilizing their space on the boat to benefit the group. Instead

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics, he emphasizes on the ethical issue of how to judiciously help the poor and the argument behind it. In the beginning of the essay Hardin responds to the comparison of Earth as a spaceship, by stating that it can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists to justify suicidal policies for sharing our resources through uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid. Interestingly enough, he prefers to address the issue with a lifeboat metaphor, in which refers to the rich nations (such as the United States) as being aboard the boat, as well as the poor nations who are swimming around the boats for…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Hardin (1915-2003) – He was a known scholar who took the fields of ecology and microbiology. One of his major works that was accomplished during his lifetime was an essay called, “The Tragedy of the Commons” in 1968. It delves into problems that will be and is currently being encountered by the human race about our excessive overuse of Earth's resources and its increase from the rising population. This had an impact in that it led into multiple debate and addressing of political issues.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These two examples, though different in nature, relate to Hardin’s theory of the tragedy of commons by promoting themes of self-interest, limited resources, and sacrifice. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garrett Hardin, humans putting their own self-interest before the good of their community is referenced multiple times. On page 2, Hardin describes the growing problem with overpopulation, discussing how, in his mind, it would seem that parents who have more children would be less capable of giving their children the proper care that a parent with fewer children could. Hardin believes that this would cause them to leave fewer descendants in the long run, however, he then goes on to discuss that since “our society is deeply committed to the ‘welfare state’,” this can never be the case.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On Easter island the humans were there own problem they are the reason there were no more trees and all the animals left they were selfish and all they cared about was making the biggest statue. In the Lorax the once-ler was only thinking about money so he cute down all the trees and that also cause all the animals to leave he polluted the air will his factories which ruined the water. There is only one blame for this and its humans. Tragedy of the commons is all about how an individual does something that is destructive to something else. Well has it suggests in Hardin's essay there really is no fix to this.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Boat Ethics Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With this idea of a tragedy of commons, the author gives an example as the world food bank. Hardin believes, and I agree, that the World Food Bank perpetuates the problem by supplying the poorest nations with more food, and that the poorest nations are multiplying their populations faster than the rich nations. Another angle, on the tragedy of commons theme, is the environmental damage done by mega farming and overharvesting. I contend that this reduces the quality of life for everyone. Land is stripped for Factory farms and forest are raped of trees; water is polluted.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compelling Logic for Moral Degradation Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin, both of whom argue strong opposition to the continually expanding world population, present compelling logic in favor of their point using distinct styles. Malthus, in his paper, “An Essay on the Principle of Population, determines by the use of mathematical evidence that natural disasters are a positive check on human population and that an increase in human population correlates to a decrease on the moral quality of current life (556); using similar forms of logical evidence, Hardin concludes in his essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, that humans are innately fallible and are therefore unable to provide the resources necessary to uphold subsistence (585). Though it seems as if both Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin express similar assessments of, and goals for, world population, each man approaches his own solution with a unique view using various rhetorical strategies. Thomas Malthus addresses his academic audience in a logical and consequent manner; by providing multiple claims, and subsequent evidences, Malthus effectively conveys his views. Additionally, the economist provides potential scenarios and their outcomes.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Octavia Butler’s The Parable of the Sower the reader sees a society whose commons has been destroyed by large-scale forces such as an alternative-right wing President controlling an inadequate, neoliberal economy, a capitalist civilization which fails to maximize the ‘good’ of all citizens, and a national ideology that is built upon a rigid, outdated set of values. The large-scale failure of the commons coincides with the theory proposed by Hardin about what makes an unsuccessful or successful commons. Butler takes their theory a step further in her novel by showing how these large-scale elements lead to small-scale community effects such as isolation and willful ignorance. This successive fragmentation of society and its impact on individual communities and citizens presented by Butler can be analyzed through Garret Hardin’s political theory on the tragedy of the commons. Butler introduces her readers into a society that suffers from large-scale flaws resulting in a failed commons.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peter Singer Famine

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To Hardin, it is nationhood and the concept of overpopulation that should dictate an individual’s role in helping the poor. He believes those that live far away on other continents, or within other states, should not receive help from those in wealthy nations like the United States. American citizens, according to Hardin, have no obligation to help those that are starving in other countries, even as a result of a failing government. He believes that any foreign aid given to states will only lead to worse outcomes for the rest of the world. If countries provide foreign aid, “poor countries will not learn to mend their ways, and will suffer progressively great emergencies as their population grows.”…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Modest Proposal Essay

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This in turn produces a new nation with which helpful citizens can live in unity. When one nation gives to another nation who then learns how to produce the necessary resources to survive without assistance, then it produces a ripple effect. Which then creates a system in which everybody helps everybody and no man is left behind. With Hardin’s mindset comes cynical thinking that in order to stay on top you must tread on those beneath you, however, it’s much easier to help people than it is to harm…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the essay, Hardin relates overpopulation and tragedy of the commons to the Lifeboat analogy-thus Lifeboat ethics should be used. (Main Argument) Singer’s essay is trying to convince that everyone should reduce suffering by any means necessary. He puts a great emphasis on helping those who are distant from us. Singer links this case back to the analogy of the drowning child, he argues that if there are a lot of people surrounding the drawing child and no one is helping him out-…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In defense of the survivors’ guilt arising from not helping the poor, he claimed that “the net result of conscience-stricken people giving up their unjustly held seats is the elimination of that sort of conscience from the lifeboat”. He defined guilty about one’s good luck as a type of conscience and the newcomer’s lack of guilt about the rich people’s loss as conscience drain; but the author deliberately omitted the morality of rich people’s indifference to the poor asking for help. Counting the negative effects on total conscience in the lifeboat if no rescue is attempted, the final solution to the lifeboat dilemma might be changed. Essentially, the author’s negligence of social injustice against impoverished people and the ethical issue indifference is just a result of his bias for the rich countries.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: In the article “Living on a Lifeboat,” Garrett Hardin believes that our obligations to the poor and hungry are metaphors based on the ethics of living on a lifeboat and the tragedy of the common. The ethics of living on lifeboat is based upon the rich and the poor. Rich people are in the lifeboat and poor people are in the sea. The wealthy has only three options in the situation with the poor people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Sheri Fink, “The moral values, ethical codes and laws that guide our choices are...important to help us navigate the confusing and disorienting time of a disaster.” Although ethics and morals are important in everyday life, they become of greater importance during a time of difficulty. In the book, The Lifeboat, by Charlotte Rogan, the morals of Grace Winter reflect the value of doing what is good for the entire community, no matter the consequences of doing so, which contradicts the ethics of her society due to the illegality of murder. The action of the fight between herself and the boat’s self deployed captain, Mr. Hardie, represents a moral dilemma because Grace is conflicted with the ethicality of killing him. Based on her…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays