Pro-choice, pro-life, but back before this there wasn't a choice for abortion at, unless the mother was endangered by the pregnancy. The laws were strict, especially in Texas where our famous “Jane Roe” (which is not her real name), a single woman with a fetus inside her, not an actual child or human, because a fetus cannot live on it's on. The debate is that life begins at the moment of conception, at least in Texas and most places at this time, but scientifically it takes until the end of the 1 trimester to find out the sex of the fetus, but it takes the fetus until the 3rd trimester to be fully formed, besides the growth and then finally there will be a baby. This argument can be seen both ways, but recently it has been extremely
…show more content…
This case took three years forcing Roe to have a baby and give it up for adoption. She followed through with the case, and the laws allowed women to have the privacy, safety, and clean environment to go through this procedure. You can be anti-abortion or pro-choice, but the main point was now a woman has the rights to her body and has the right to have an abortion of an unwanted pregnancy and not have to go through certain dangerous procedures it used to take. The way this case could be seen as good for both pro-choice and pro-life advocates is the fact that women have the choice, but there are limits to this law as earlier stated protecting the fetus growing inside the pregnant …show more content…
This case was more than allowing women to get abortions; it gave the right to woman’s own body and the right to the privacy of their choice of pregnancy and possibly the horrid things that could have happened if she followed through. Clinics that were supposed to care for the privacy of these women, the sensitivity aspects of taking to them and informing them the other options and such didn’t have clean facilities equipment or even much experience with such a procedure. Also Roe V. Wade created the fight for Planned Parenthood. The cases that are dealing with women’s right will create controversy and raise awareness for the unequal laws between the sexes. Possibly as a result from this women will fight to receive equal rights. One good thing out of this it could raise awareness of contraceptives if women are not comfortable with this choice, as well as the importance of knowing the right time to do such things depending on the
This case took three years forcing Roe to have a baby and give it up for adoption. She followed through with the case, and the laws allowed women to have the privacy, safety, and clean environment to go through this procedure. You can be anti-abortion or pro-choice, but the main point was now a woman has the rights to her body and has the right to have an abortion of an unwanted pregnancy and not have to go through certain dangerous procedures it used to take. The way this case could be seen as good for both pro-choice and pro-life advocates is the fact that women have the choice, but there are limits to this law as earlier stated protecting the fetus growing inside the pregnant …show more content…
This case was more than allowing women to get abortions; it gave the right to woman’s own body and the right to the privacy of their choice of pregnancy and possibly the horrid things that could have happened if she followed through. Clinics that were supposed to care for the privacy of these women, the sensitivity aspects of taking to them and informing them the other options and such didn’t have clean facilities equipment or even much experience with such a procedure. Also Roe V. Wade created the fight for Planned Parenthood. The cases that are dealing with women’s right will create controversy and raise awareness for the unequal laws between the sexes. Possibly as a result from this women will fight to receive equal rights. One good thing out of this it could raise awareness of contraceptives if women are not comfortable with this choice, as well as the importance of knowing the right time to do such things depending on the