In doing so, he relieves the tension ‘between domesticity…and men’s working lives’ (Hollows, 2003: 237). Jamie Oliver’s brand of domestic masculinity has been adopted by men, and arguably sells “a discourse of accessibility and achievability” (Moseley, 2001: 39). His portrayal of the ‘lad’ while cooking is reflected through his insistence that cooking must always be “a laugh” (Hollows, 2003: 233). Further, Oliver and therefore the ‘new lad’ cook according to leisure, which is often associated with choice (Adler, 1981:
In doing so, he relieves the tension ‘between domesticity…and men’s working lives’ (Hollows, 2003: 237). Jamie Oliver’s brand of domestic masculinity has been adopted by men, and arguably sells “a discourse of accessibility and achievability” (Moseley, 2001: 39). His portrayal of the ‘lad’ while cooking is reflected through his insistence that cooking must always be “a laugh” (Hollows, 2003: 233). Further, Oliver and therefore the ‘new lad’ cook according to leisure, which is often associated with choice (Adler, 1981: