James V. Rugs Case Study

Decent Essays
After reading the whole case of James v. Boise I have just one major concern. I sometimes get worried that the federal government has too much power of the states. The concern comes for lessons learned from reasons why the Civil War happen. If the states feel powerless they will most likely try to succeed from the union once again. A positive fact that I found about the case is that if the lower courts are not adhering to laws and restrictions that are set forth for them the Supreme Court has the right to overrule the initial ruling of the case.
I firmly believe that the Supreme Court is solving problems when it comes to cases very similar to this because, it can be utilized for lessons learned for other states if they ever find their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Despite the fact that the Constitution was written based on Federalist theories, it still allowed some power to rest only in the hands of the state government. This made American citizens content in the United States’ newly established…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case worked its way up to the Supreme Court. In a five to four vote, the majority decided that the ban was in fact a violation of the second amendment rights. Justice Scalia's argument…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Robert versus Boston- Robert v. Boston challenged the separation of schools based on the color of their skin (nps.com). In 1848, a year old girl named Sarah Roberts was stopped from going to that school because she was black. Her dad Benjamin pressed charges against the city. The lawsuit was a effort by the black community to end segregated schools.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should powers like these rest in the hands of the federal government or does it belong to the states? According to Larson, “fearing consolidation at the hands of distant elites, or jealous of local advantages, most congressmen refused to vest that authority [for a national system of internal improvements] in the president or any other agents who might injure their interests at home.” (384) Adam only feeds into this fear of a strong federal…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that Congress was violating the Twenty-first Amendment by taking away states decision for their minimun drinking age. This case brings the issue of federalism into play by questioning who has the power over law-making. Does Congress have the right to take away a states right to decide the legal drinking age? While South Dakota obviously thought that this was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court had believed otherwise. With a 7 to 2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled Congress' law constitutional.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also the there was no statue saying the sentences should be reserved concurrently and that it is not a decision for this court to make and should be redirected to another court. Overall, I agree with the final decision in affirming the courts…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The major issues pertaining to the case was, that Coleman had basically had a lot of wrongdoing before, during, and after his investigations. He no evidence to prove on all those cases that he supposedly had investigated and made arrests and convictions on. On top of that after they had hired Coleman they found indictments on him for theft. Then to find him guilty of one count of aggravated perjury. Also that Stewart was involved in a perjury trial, and courts felt that Stewart knew everything that Coleman was already involved in; which he claimed he didn't.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am a christian. So I see the issue taking place in this court case differently then someone with different beliefs than me would. I also get that my opinion on this issue may be considered biased to some of y’all. That’s alright with me. Anyways I realize my discussion post is really long and if you actually read everything I had to say.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Scopes Trial took place in 1925 in Dayton, Tennessee. A group of teachers decided to test a law called the Butler Law. The Butler law made it illegal to teach the theory of evolution and instead mandated the biblical interpretation of creationism. The teachers felt that academic freedom and integrity as well as separation of church and state was at stake. Twenty four year old science teacher and football coach John T. Scopes would teach the class.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Washington D.C, the state that was founded on November 11, 1889 by the first President of the United States, George Washington. I want to go on this trip because I want to learn about the Supreme Court and the White House. Another place I would like to learn about is the World War II Memorial. The first place I would want to see is the Supreme Court. I want to learn about the Supreme Court because it is the only court that was made by the Constitution and it is the only court that leads the Judicial branch of the United States.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allowing the states to have complete power will create chaos and disunity. Having so many different voices will lead to destruction of the Union, we must act as one voice together for the future…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule 83 Essay

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Generally, Under F. R. C. P. Rule 83, the courts should not enforce local laws in a way that a litigant loses their civil or basic right. F. R. C. P. Rule 83. Rules by District Courts; Judge's Directives (a) Local Rules. (1) In General. After giving public notice and an opportunity for comment, a district court, acting by a majority of its district judges, may adopt and amend rules governing its practice.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antonin Scalia died at age 79 with the title of a Supreme Court Justice. Ever since his passing there has been questions about whether or not the president should elect a new Justice. Duty or not, since there is less than a year left in the standing presidential term the president should not pick someone to fill the void in the Supreme Court. With the president trying to tie up loose ends in the office, since this is his last term, trying to pick a new justice would be a bad idea. It is not leaving ample time for him to search through all the nominees that are available, selecting the right fit for the position that was left open.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Who should have more power the Federal or State Governments? I think that the Federal Government should have more power than State Government. When depending on the State Government they were only depending on it for money. When the people of the states came together to change the Article of Confederation the State Government lost some of its power and got weaker the Federal Government gave the power from the State to the central Government. The Federal Government was stronger than the State Government from the very beginning the Federal Government had the power to take power whenever it wanted and the state could not do a thing about it because, the Federal Government was stronger in many other aspects that the state…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1776 the Continental Congress convened with the idea of creating a new and independent nation. This nation would give freedoms and liberties to all people regardless of gender, race, creed, or nationality. It is this basis that our nation was founded on, but recently politicians have been attempting to remove some of the freedoms our forefathers fought and died to have and to protect. Throughout the last several years the American federal government has continued to slowly remove the freedoms of American citizens in small increments. The USA Patriot Act of 2001 removed the freedom of privacy from law abiding citizens of the United States.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays