James Madison's 'Federalist Number 10'

Improved Essays
The late 18th century brought a time of rapid growth and development for the people of the New World. Along with this growth and development brought a series of conflict and disagreement about the overall fate of this new and developing nation. James Madison, author of Federalist Number 10, argues his position on a particular form of government that would ultimately provide safety and desirability to the New World. Madison introduces his argument in favor of the fact that the Constitution has the ability to form a government in which factions can be broken down and controlled. He states that factions are simply groups of citizens who share mutual commonalities and come together in order to support and protect these common economic, political,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meanwhile, the states can, “set up local regimes, hold elections and establish schools.” As James Madison verbalized, “The different regimes will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What James Madison is endeavoring to…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in early America was a period of experimentation. With the Revolution over, colonies began drafting their state constitutions, and America worked on the Articles of Confederation. This new country was eager to construct a smooth- running government, but the poorly constructed document only led to problems. Due to a lack of national powers, which ultimately led to an uprising and other difficulties, it was only a matter of time before the United States would need to make corrections to the government. This “Critical Period” eventually proved that America needed to repair their government and create a brand-new constitution.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5000 Year Leap Essay

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The 5000 Year Leap by Cleon Skousen analyzes the 28 principles that the Founding Fathers believed to be necessary for peace and prosperity in America and illustrates how those beliefs perpetuated greater progress in 200 years than was previosly made in 5000. To America by Stephen E. Ambrose is a historian’s personal reflections on America’s history and the people who contributed to making it into the country it is today. By analyzing both books, one can observe where America upheld and fell short in meeting the principles that the Founding Fathers viewed as essential to the country’s success. One can also view where America has fallen short in observing these principles and the effect left on the American people as a result. Certain principles were more significant to the founding and guiding of our country and had a more considerable effect on America.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack N. Rakove Summary

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rakove makes the astute observation that many Americans are sadly not aware of the beginning years of their Republic, much less are they aware of its creator, James Madison. In his short and concise book, Rakove seamlessly integrates political science and history into one whole, moving from discussing Madison to the early Confederation and Republic’s many moving parts, then back to Madison. Fortunately for Rakove, Madison felt the need to keep an accurate historical record for later Americans, and so he wrote many of this thoughts and feelings down, allowing for a level of “direct connectivity” between the reader and Madison himself. As well as these primary sources, Rakove employs many other highly-praised secondary sources to better uncover Madison and his life for the general reader. Overall, this book is a wonderfully useful piece of historical research that has been designed for use by anyone interested in learning more about early American history and politics, and confirms Rakove’s thesis that Madison was indeed a remarkable…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often times when people think of early American historical figures that were against slavery, former president Abraham Lincoln is the first to come to mind. There were, of course, many before him. Alexander Hamilton “was steadfast committed to the eventual abolition of slavery” unlike many of his time. He stood his ground on his beliefs multiple times; his debates with Thomas Jefferson on the subject recorded through history. Hamilton brought light to the racial issue.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The beliefs and values embraced by Thomas Jefferson in his Letter to James Madison can be seen by some as archaic and insensible to a growing society. Although America’s values on the basis of economy and society have shifted somewhat, a few of his ideas can still be interwoven into how America regards itself. Another writing of Jefferson’s will be referenced in the course of this essay, since it has a clearer sense of why Jefferson felt the way he did about agrarian societies. This writing is Query XIX from his Notes on the State of Virginia, the final edition published in 1785. The points maintained in this writing support those contained within his Letter to James Madison, even if he is speaking specifically of the state of Virginia instead of the country as a whole.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Carol Perkins understood more than anybody else that the reason Madison saw the need to have a bill of rights in the constitution, which most federals didn't find necessary, was because there was nothing that forbid the government from letting its citizens enjoy their liberties and further there was no stipulated framework in which the government was given the mandate to protect its citizens. To him, it was political suicide. The main reason why the Bill of rights was drafted by the founding father James Madison, was to protect the constitution and its people. (Perkins 31). Perkins made it clear that the constitutional amendment pushed by James Madison was because of his deep understanding of the importance of the bill of rights to the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    constitution, led by Hamilton and Madison, set the stage for a self-governing America. “No one planned the process that produced America’s Constitution”, but it all started in September of 1780 when “Hamilton was the first to conclude that a new government was needed”, even before the Articles of Confederation took effect and called for congress “to revise the Articles”. Calling upon congress to come together and agree was a difficult and long process. Hamilton was always ready for a national convention, yet Madison “was not ready for that drastic step”, but “after the Mount Vernon conference and a trip to New York and Philadelphia, Madison warmed to the idea of a national convention”. The Articles of Confederation needed to be revised, “the weakness of the national government afflicted everyday life” from not having a uniform currency to voting in congress and the complex almost-non existing tax system.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America’s most important document, Patrick Henry and James Madison played two key roles in the development of the Constitution. These two men had different views on how America should be governed. Patrick Henry who was against the new Constitution and sided with the Anti-Federalists. James Madison was the architect of the Constitution and felt a powerful government was needed in order for the colonies to not fall apart. After the Revolutionary War the colonies needed some help with the low imports from Britain since they were cut off from the war and the debt was increasing.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays