Failure To Catch Jack The Ripper Essay

Decent Essays
Were the police to blame for the failure to catch Jack the Ripper? In my opinion they were not to blame for this failure. The officers at the time had a lack of forensic equipment. Useless witnesses who are unable to describe the Ripper, because they don’t know what he actually looks like. Also many pet conspiracies were against the police as they tried to catch Jack the Ripper. These reasons suggest that the lack of evidence was not the police’s fault for the failure, but after the last murder police stopped searching for the Ripper only two months from the last homicide. This gap of two months is shorter than the gap between the murders, hinting the police might of know something that the public didn’t.

In the year 1888 the police force had limited forensic equipment. DNA testing was far beyond their time, even fingerprints weren't recognized as a tool for investigating. Only during the 1920’s did forensic equipment make a stride. During Jack the Ripper’s time police were only able to give an undescriptive autopsy on the victims. Even when they could see the victims were cut and stabbed, they can’t tell which type
…show more content…
The lack of forensic knowledge was to blame, because forensics today is a crucial element in putting suspects in the slam. The only way possible to put Jack in jail, was to catch the Ripper committing the crime. Another reason why I doubt the police are to blame is because of all the unrealistic theories that the police was and/or knew the Ripper. A man who has dedicated his life for the safety of his town would unlikely use his power for bad. Even though the police shut down the investigation in a time gap that doesn't coordinate with the murders, I do think it was only a coincidence. Rather than the pet conspiracy that states the police knew who the Ripper was. If they had knowledge on who the Ripper was, than they would of tried everything they had to put the man in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Bad Evidence Case Study

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But why would Wilds go to the authorities in the first place, if from there, he doesn’t even have his story made up? The only reason he went that day was to tell lies and expected the police to believe him, which they did, understandably. Because they didn’t have a lead. In the podcast, Koenig refers back to the Justin Wolfe case and how he was wrongly convicted of the crimes that was accused of him. And was later found that the one who gave police the lead, was the one to blame for the crime.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Los Angeles couldn’t find proper evidence so the men that were suspects were let go because they couldn’t be charged for a murder that the police have no evidence that they actually did it. The Black Dahlia is very interesting and it’s truly sad the way Elizabeth was killed. At least she was famous like she always wanted. This case was not a witch hunt because no one was charged for the murder of Elizabeth Short. Even though people were accused and there was some suspects and also the police department received an anonymous letter from the killer, they could never figure out who did it and that is why i believe it's not a witch hunt.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Doe Film Analysis

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the entirety of his killing spree, not one witness spotted him. This means that either people never did see him, or, more likely, he didn’t stand out in the crowd. The final characteristic a person would need to have to pull off murders like these is intelligence. To avoid getting apprehended by the police before he wished to, John Doe scraped off skin on his fingers so that he wouldn’t leave any of his own prints at the crime scenes. This act indicates a high level of intelligence.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Investigators the dismissed him from being a suspect although they did have their suspicions about the bottle. Now thinking if Mr. S. didn’t kill Hae, and neither did Adnan, who did? The answer is no one knows, but a lot of evidence points to Jay as being the suspect. He knew a lot of details about what happened and even knew where Hae’s car was located when Adnan and Jay supposedly hid it. Adnan looks more innocent when having a mindset that Jay was the murderer and blaming his buddy so that he could get away with…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The judge had enough evidence to have a reasonable doubt and they excluded it, and threw it out. So the jury would never even know the Bobby Pole was a potential suspect. One of the witnesses at the Voir dire hearing stated they saw him wearing white gloves when he rode his bike around town, which Ron said he does indeed have white gloves, but he cuts out the fingers of them. Cannino, J., & Cotton, R. (2009) The attacker was wearing white gloves during the rape if they were Ron 's gloves they would have left fingerprints because they…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Simpson to the murder, the prosecution failed to establish in the minds of the jury that he committed the crime. The defense was able to shift the focus off the damaging evidence of the crime, and more towards the acquisition of that evidence, the ill-treatment of the crime scene, and the history of the Los Angeles Police Department in regards to treatment of minority groups. It can be said that the celebrity status of this case greatly influenced the verdict, as well as the circumstances that led up to that decision. Many of the normal legal proceedings that occur at the crime scene of a murder were bypassed or poorly managed. The apprehension of O.J.…

    • 2073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He also clearly states that he saw her in the trunk and he knows what he saw. The easiest way to counter his statements is he is a drug dealer. You never trust a drug dealer even if you think he is telling the truth because he is involved in illegal activity all the time. As you can see, Jay is not a reliable resource and should not be trusted considering his illegal activities. In brief, Adnan Syed is not guilty because he has an alibi, no motivation for the murder, and the witnesses of the murder are not reliable.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, he did not conduct further investigations at the time to determine whether Romeo’s alibi was valid or not. What happened instead is that Romeo became the lead suspect in the Mr. Roy’s homicide investigation (Moles, 2009). Not even the recanting of the confession would save him from the jail term for non-capital murder. While Romeo may have been in the town when the crime occurred, he may not have necessarily been the one who committed the crime. Mrs. Roy, who saw the prowler thrice, did not identify him as a possible suspect.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To their way of thinking, the death penalty permanently incapacitates the criminal, but they believe that life without parole does as well. On the other hand, if we keep murderers in prison, will they be released only to commit other dreadful crimes? A significant number do. A lifetime imprisonment can 't stop anyone from killing other inmates or guards, because they most likely have nothing to lose by doing so. Many people have been found innocent after years on death row due to advanced technology that wasn 't available/ not used in their initial case or by additional witnesses coming forward.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first few problems stemmed from one very important one - the police were inexperienced when it came to kidnappings and homicides. This caused many things to happen such as crime scene contamination, tampering of evidence, and refusal of outside help. Within the first 24 hours of the crime happening, the police did not question the key witnesses or neighbors which caused a major problem when it comes to who may have seen something important. The pathologist also showed up 18 hours after the crime was committed which can cause a conflict in finding evidence, and providing a valid cause of death of the victim. The fact that the police also did not close off the entire house to investigate, just portions, could have caused a lot of evidence to be lost.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays