Jack And Ralph Leadership Analysis

Superior Essays
In the novel Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, a group of British boys become stranded on an island without any adults there to govern them. Two boys are quickly established among them as leaders of the group. Ralph’s style of leadership is very democratic, listening to input from the other boys, making everyone equal, as well as trying to do what is best for them. In contrast, Jack has a dictator like way of ruling, discounting anyone else’s input, aiming for absolute power, and putting his desires ahead of more important tasks. Both leaders have advantages and disadvantages however. In the struggle for power, Jack and Ralph use two very different leadership styles, giving deeper insight into their motivations and personalities.

Ralph’s
…show more content…
He acts as more of a dictator, a vicious, imposing leader, giving no one else the right to speak freely unlike Ralph. Jack uses lots of constraints when speaking to the other boys, shouting out orders for them to be quiet or stand still. This demonstrates his very demanding and intimidating nature. When he first meets the other boys he states that he ‘ought to be chief’ showing that he thinks he is better than everyone else. It also shows that he does not care for the input of the other boys. When Jack loses the vote for leader to Ralph, he becomes in control of hunting and maintaining the signal fire. He quickly develops an obsession with hunting however, and fails to do the one job he was assigned to by Ralph. The signal fire extinguished when unattended and was therefore unable to alert a passing plane. This shows the different set of priorities that Jack has. He excludes himself from some of the more tedious jobs such as this and does only what he wants. In meetings, he is very dismissive of the ideas of the other boys. He never lets anything get in his way of having the total power over the people that he wants without anyone else’s opinion. “We don’t need the conch anymore” he says, “We know who ought to say things.” Even though Jack has no organization, he has complete control over those who follow him. His rebellious personality makes him a very violent leader with unfair ways of ruling. It is possible however, …show more content…
The negatives of Ralph’s leadership are that not everyone is always going to be satisfied with the ruler and their decisions. The hunters are an example of people who rebelled from Ralph, taking Jack’s side. Advantages are that there is much less room for corruption and abuse of the immense power the leader has, as well as freedom of speech. Jack’s leadership has all of the decision making lie with him and him alone. Although this allows decisions to be made much faster as there is no need to argue, the leader as in Jack’s case, can be corrupt and take advantage of their power. This also provides less consideration to the people’s opinions and needs. The main difference between Jack and Ralph’s leadership however lies with their motivation. Ralph wants to be a true leader and perform to his greatest ability, doing what is best for all the boys. Jack however, is merely hungry for power, and seeks to be chief merely to gain adoration. Jack’s attitude toward the rules reveals him to be self-centered, concerned with only his own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jack was too contumacious to even acknowledge Ralph’s opposition, instead blocking it out and continuing with his own agenda. Even if Jack can be proven to be a passable leader, he is still an arrogant tyrant because of his cunning personality. In his tribe, Jack “hemmed in the [boys] terror and made it governable” (152). This process of fear-mongering might have accumulated more adherents into his following, but it proves that he is not a good leader. The inhabitants did not voluntarily join with Jack but are only there for the sake of their own lives.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s like an absolute monarchy since Ralph is given the power. While he is described as a primarily good character, him having all the power made him evil because he is ordering everyone on what to do and making the island run solely one what he thinks is best which is not always…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With little to no regard for those around him. Jack, unlike Ralph, values no ones opinion but his own, acting more like an unorganized dictator than a true leader. Piggy makes an excellent point when he says, “which is better- to have rules and agree, or to hunt and kill?” (164). The correct answer is plain and clear, any human being should be able to respond, but Jack, immaturely, feels the need to be in charge and have his, and only his, own way. So he instead chooses to manipulate the rest of the children on the island into believing that he’s the best possible leadership option for them.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack demands that he should claim the chief role “with simple arrogance” (22). From the beginning, Jack has full confidence in himself to rule the island, an important leadership skill that all quality authority figures must acquire. However, in Jack’s case, too much confidence can result in excessive conceitedness, where the authority figure ignores all other suggestions on improving their policies because of pride. “Jack shook his head,” to indicate that although the littluns have trouble sleeping, he still believes he should not change his actions to please them, refusing to give them more care and attention than anyone else, despite their age…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Originally to serve as camouflage this quickly becomes something more to him,“The Mask was a thing on its own, behind which Jack hid, liberated from shame and self-consciousness” (Golding 64). No longer serving as the choir boys leader, Jack has welcomed his inner savage and let this control him, as well as the other boys. A good leader is approachable yet Ralph and Piggy would rather not interact with Jack while his face is painted. Lastly, Jack proves himself as an inferior leader to Ralph or Piggy through his poor choices that also hurt the group. As Jack and his tribe return from hunting they…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being “chief” in the book is about leadership and the ability to control. Ralph, the protagonist, gets this title and he does what any sane human would do which is to keep peace in order and to lead the others to stay alive. Jack, the antagonist, represents savagery and the hunger for power. Golding shows that the boys have a certain degree of civilization and savagery over the time on the island. For instance, Piggy has no desire to become a savage because he is the most rational out of all the boys, but Roger, on the other hand, does not understand the rules of being civil, making him even more of a savage.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nevertheless, he exceeds those expectations as he exemplifies a flat yet dynamic character. His employer describes him as lacking of “anything ordinarily human… [and] who never [speaks] but to answer” (484, 490). Yet, as his employer continues to disrespect his privacy, Bartleby voices out his own thoughts and says, “I would prefer to be left alone here” (493). This disassembles his employer’s former description that he only replies to questions. The fact that Bartleby voices out his opinion instead of automatically taking orders also proves that he is much more human than the other minor characters.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack is not a good enough leader because he always brings people down and doesn 't care about anyone and he is happy that there isn 't no adult supervision so that 's why he is acting the way he is. He is making everyone turn against everyone and he doesn 't care if anyone dies or is starving to death, he has no heart he is what you call cold-hearted person. After all ralph is a good leader and has a lot of power and is a very respectful young…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Toohey and Roark’s characters juxtapose each other at about every turn. Roark believes in the sanctity of individuality, creation, and uncompromising principles. Toohey on the other hand is the complete opposite; he values nothing but power for power’s sake. He crushes individuality and creation to better himself and has no principles to speak of. Toohey’s character is as deceiving as the devil and only once reveals his true colors, “Tell man that he must live for others.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Ralph fails to maintain control over the boys, he constantly shows the good leadership characteristics he possesses through events in the story. Ralph tries to convince the boys of the impossibility of a beast existing on the island to calm everyone down and keep their focus on the huts and fire. Ultimately, his attempts end in failure due to the environment of their surroundings. The boys change into savages because of the atmosphere, while he keeps his civilized demeanor, showing he preserves his sense of order, which is important for a figure of authority to have. Without Ralph’s leadership, the transformation of the kids into barbarians would have occurred much sooner.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays