JFK: The Assassination Of John F. Kennedy

The film JFK is an example of historical streamlining. The film changed the debate regarding the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Oliver Stone utilized an important historical character and chain of events for his own profit. He created myths and twisted history. He outright distorted history to further his artistic agenda. Oliver Stone’s film JFK blurs the lines between fact and fiction much like other docudramas. One of the most controversial topics about the film JFK is Stone’s argument that Lee Harvey Oswald acted by himself. Despite the convincing evidence it is just a myth. This is a good example of how history is distorted in docudramas. No authentic gimmick film will ever be entirely exact. Yet in JFK, Stone's sensational enlightenment of history is problematic, mostly because of its swollen structure. JFK is a thickly blended union of distrustful theory and recorded history. The is not a documentary of the late previous President, yet rather an unification of different paranoid fears …show more content…
By means of some smart altering, the film shows veritable narrative footage, sensational breaks, false archival footage and re-institutions of assumed recorded occasions. Upon the film's release, it was this side-by-side utilization of reality and fiction, which brought about Stone's film much controversy. Incidentally, these sketchy components are likewise the driving source behind a significant part of the film's excitement. In equivalent measure this excited kaleidoscope of pictures and data ends up being the film's downfall. There's an excessive amount of packed into JFK with little attentiveness to the film's general direction. There is framework here to express the different speculations and individuals Stone's film involves in the death: extending from the CIA, Castro Cuban-Americans and a group of conservative homosexuals based in New