Ivan The Terrible Leader Analysis

Improved Essays
Ivan the Terrible Leader
Although Ivan IV tried to expand Russia in all of its glory, he led Russia into a weakened state regarding its economy, military, and a general political disruption.
Throughout Ivan’s tsarship the economy of Russia began to weaken almost to the point of collapse. Ivan IV never trusted boyars, which are the Russian people of wealth and power, for almost his entire life. Becoming tsar at the age of three meant he was too young to lead and needed people to rule for him at the time. At first, this was his mother, however, she was assumed to be poisoned for the benefit of others power. After that, Russia was lead by four powerful and rich families, the Shuisky, Belsky, Vorontsov and Glinsky families. His first order was the arrest and execution of Prince Andrei Shuisky because his family had previously killed his close friend Fyodor Mishurin. This is only one example of him beginning to overturn the Russian wealth. Ivan IV continues increasingly punishing the boyars until he eventually begins to take away their land to redistribute among people he trusted. This was done through the Oprichnina a governmental system that rewarded people for convicting others of crimes that they did or did not commit. Ivan’s goal was to create a new class of wealth that owed their wealth to him and would stay loyal. However, all this accomplished was the thinning of the wealth which resulted in everyone becoming a middle class generally holding the same amount of power. Ivan was known to be a war enthusiast who initiated many battles with surrounding nations. One of the more notable wars was the Livonian war. This war was not only initiated by Russia, but it was initiated while they were fighting the Khans in the east. This war was fought for 24 years, from 1558 to 1583, and exhausted many resources of Russia
…show more content…
Ivan IV began the Livonian war while fighting another army, the Tartars which were the Turkic people who had Khan ancestry, that he was struggling to fight. The Livonian war had begun because Ivan wanted control of Livonia, modern day Latvia and Estonia, which belonged to Poland. At first, Russia was victorious in many battles, however, while fighting the Polish, the Tartars were able to advance all the way into Moscow, where they burned down the entire city leaving on the Kremlin, a citadel, standing. This immensely decreased Ivan’s popularity among the boyars, because they were against the Livonian war from the beginning. They believed that they should continue fighting the Tartars in the east. Ivan IV continued fighting Poland, however now their allies, the Swedish, joined them in fighting. Shortly after this, one of Ivan’s most trusted and powerful generals betrayed him and fought for Poland. Russia began taking huge loses, and it seemed almost impossible for them to win. Ivan feeling defeated went to Pope Gregory XIII in hopes that he will end the battle. Pope Gregory XIII created a cease fire protecting Russia from taking any more losses. The war ended with Russia suffering. Although Russia previously held access to the Baltic Sea, after losing the Livonian war they lost all access which was now held by Sweden. This made it much harder to trade with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Evidently, Ivan IV made a positive impact on Russia, but let not forget why one makes this argument. With great power comes great…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a name like Ivan the Terrible, it is hard to deny the possibility of Ivan IV reigning as the supreme absolute monarch. Despite his numerous bouts of psychosis and general instability, he was a ruthless ruler who would achieve what he desired by any means necessary, with absolute devotion to his state and his faith. One of the essential qualities of an absolute monarch is obtaining and maintaining full control of the lowly peasantry. Such a task may seem so simple, but without strict control of the lower classes, any monarchy can be overthrown due to the large numbers and sheer determination of said peasants.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Napoleon III Dbq

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On top of luring the Grand Armée through Russia, Czar Alexander also implemented a scorched earth policy, meaning, as the Russian Army retreated they would set fire to the land and structures in and around the areas they abandoned so that the French could not use the crops for food or the buildings for shelter. Then Moscow Governor-General Fyodor Rostopchin “ordered Moscow should burn to the ground rather than be possessed by the French” (Fisher, 2006). After a defeat at the Battle of Vinkovo, the French Emperor believed that if he left Russia now, it would appear as though he had been defeated. He instead chose to make one last ditch effort to move south to fight again.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Great Britain Dbq

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Russo-Japanese War was fought between the Russian Empire and the Empire of Japan over rival imperial ambitions in Manchuria and Korea. Fighting over iron and other natural resources, Russia and Japan would eventually be forced to sign a treaty. Russia was humilated, Japan felt deprived of its assured victory.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although numerous events contributed to Russia’s downfall, everything followed from two primary sources. Tsar Ivan IV’s policies of opportunist and war in Livonia left Russia economically depleted and politically unstable. Ivan did not always ascribe to the descriptor of…

    • 3917 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas was charming and intelligent a man who had the welfare of russia at heart. But Nicholas lacked the necessary characteristics for autocratic rule. He was anxious, distrustful of ministers such as Witte and stolypin, who urged reform. his abilities were undermines by his diffidence and irresolution.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catherine The Great Dbq

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Despite ruling amongst other monarchs during the time, Catherine the Great deserves to be crowned the absolutist of them all based off of her control of the nobility and peasantry, taxes and government spending, and the Russian military, throughout Russia’s Golden Age. During her rule, Catherine II gave more power and rights to the nobility and allowed for the continuation of serfdom to maintain her rule as Russia’s monarch. In addition, she brought reform to the Russian society by introducing a more affordable education and become a patron of arts. She appointed military experts to lead the military into gaining parts of Poland and lands around the Black Sea, that allowed for an increased in Russia’s trade with other empires of the time.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Decrees

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Peter the Great wanted “to transform his country through a process of state imposed Westernization.” He was convinced that Russia could overcome its backwardness only by adopting “the institutions, customs and attitudes of the technologically superior, wealthier and more powerful states of Western Europe.” Many were opposed to his decrees and edicts because they would “mean discarding much of Russia’s distinctive past.” Those “devoted to Russia’s unique Slavic and Orthodox Christian traditions” …” argued that abandonment of Russia’s past was too high a price to pay for Europeanization.”…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rasputin’s influence over the royal family made him widely hated, especially by the aristocracy. Other short term factors include the discontent amongst the Russian people due to the Tsarinas leadership during the First World War, this discontent stemmed from the fact that the Tsarina was German and…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 17th and 18th centuries (A.D.), Russia was governed by two Emperors, respectively known as Peter the Great and Elizabeth the Great. Many advances were made during both reigns, in westernizing the country and in expanding its borders. Despite these various accomplishments, both Peter I and Catherine II were not as “Great” as their titles suggested due to policy issues, their callous treatment of people, and oppressive autocratic reigns. Peter Alexeyevich created many ambitious reforms and policies during his reign, but sadly most ended up dying with him. The nobles ignored his policy of service to the state and his other policies resulted in the enlargement of serfdom and a widening gap between Russia and the West.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nicholas II played a vital, negative role in contributing to his complete downfall during the early 20th century. His reluctance to become Tsar was a major factor that contributed to his own demise. The release of the October Manifesto in 1905 was one of the key events that led to the end of Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Tsar Nicholas’s poor leadership in World War 1 as well as his weak-willed personality was also issues that further contributed to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. These factors and events severely influenced the political, social and economic aspects of his ruling .The…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Great Biography

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His father, Basil the third, died when he was just 3 years old. His mother, Elena Glinskaya, ruled until her death in 1538 when ivan was 8. Different boyar families disputed the legitimacy of her rule during this time and the area fell into chaos. The court meddling with his life and his life constantly being in danger shaped him into the ruthless and paranoid man he became. History shows ivan as a sensitive and smart young boy who was mistreated and looked down upon by members of the noble…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent was military defeat a cause for the Russian revolution? The First World War was truly massive war. It had rather complex origins, it was vast in terms of scale, its human and material costs were enormous, and its results were profound. The First World War resulted in the end of four empires; the German, the Russian, the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman empires all ceased to exist by the end of the First World, either as a result of the economic demands of war - like Russia, which had a revolution half way through the war - or as a result of losing.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Russo-Japanese War, Russia and Japan were battling over Korea and Manchuria. Both countries signed contracts over the regions, but Russia broke them. Japan responded by attacking Russians at Port Arthur in Manchuria. Russians got news of this, and that led to a revolt in the middle of the war. On Bloody Sunday, 200,000 works walked to the czar’s palace in St. Petersburg, but the czar’s soldiers mistook them for revolutionaries planning to attack, so they killed or hurt thousands of Russian works.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prince Mentschikoff threatened the Ottoman Empire and as a result the Czar of Russia was forced to back up his prince our else he would look weak. He also believes that the Czar Nicholas backed his prince because he already disliked Napoleon the Third and the war would give him a pretense to start a war with Napoleon using the Ottoman Empire. According to Rambaud, Czar Nicholas purposely sent Prince Mentschikoff when he did because both the French and English embassies didn’t have chiefs in Constantinople. The threat, which may or may not have been authorized by Czar Nicholas, was also accompanied by Russian troop deployments to the Russian- Ottoman boarder. Rambaud also states that the war had nothing to do with Russia making an attempt to grab the holy land for themselves.…

    • 2542 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics