It Should Be Morally Acceptable To Break The Law Analysis

Improved Essays
Some may say it is never morally acceptable to break the law. Plato supported this claim in Crito through Socrates, the main character with the option of escaping from prison. He was imprisoned and sentenced by the Athenian court to death for corrupting the youth. His friend Crito challenges Socrates with various arguments as to why he should break the law by escaping from prison.
Opposed, some say it is morally acceptable to break the law. Martin Luther King would support this position. King would say yes, at times it is morally justifiable to break the law. In his Letter from Birmingham Jail he defends this position and outlines the specific case when is it morally permissible to break the law which is when a law is unjust. He will also
…show more content…
My reasons as to why share some similarities to those of Kings but has other cases in which it would be justified in breaking the law. my claim is that people should only break unjust laws. Those unjust law are defined as any laws put in place to exploit, assimilate and or change in any form those who are marginalized and minorities within society.
My argument in support is that each person has the right to their differences as long as it does not impede on the lives of others and should be able to practice and or live the life they please. In support of my argument, everyone should be able to live their lives to their full potential without any interference. The only way to create positive social change is through individuals being able to live the life they choose and through expressing their needs in order to better society. We have made errors in the past impeding on people 's lives and today have corrected them. We may still have laws that need to be altered and the only way to know they are unjust is by breaking them and informing the law creators of the injustices occurring. For example, at one time same sex marriage was illegal in Canada. This was impeding on the lives of many which resulted in people realizing it was an unjust law through the people who protested to get same sex rights. Although, this did lead to a positive social change. Therefore, we may still have laws impeding on lives that can be broken to create positive social change allowing people to live their lives to their full

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Humans are stubborn creatures, and take comfort in familiarity. Any threat to such comfort causes an outrage amongst the people. Martin Luther King Jr.’s civil rights movement threatened the status-quo, causing fear of racial equality. While his fellow clergymen should support human welfare, they choose to criticize King. In the Birmingham city jail letter, King explained his intentions to the clergy by delicately balancing both pathos and logos.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both King and Socrates were outspoken men who stood by their beliefs despite others thoughts. While Socrates follows a strict guideline that under no circumstance is breaking laws okay; King has a slightly altered position stating, “One has not only legal but a moral responsibility to follow just laws,” he goes on, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” When discussing the debate of just and unjust laws, King follows God’s standards, the “Natural Law. ”It would be erroneous to strictly base your standards on actual laws when laws are constantly changing. Furthermore, if laws are constantly changing, a person’s standards may change.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (16)(A) An explanation that I reject comes from Rachels Evil and is the idea that evil is the result of a person’s wrongdoing. I do believe that people should be and are punished for doing wrong but the punishment is not always something that fits the crime. Some people who commit small crimes receive worse punishments then those who commit worse crimes. You would expect God to hand out punishments fairly but he does not.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexius Sparkman Dr. Ernest Williamson III English Composition II 1 February 2017 Letter from Birmingham Jail Analysis Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere: many minorities would feel this to be true. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote Letter from Birmingham Jail on April 16, 1963 while he was imprisoned for being a participant in a nonviolent protest against segregation. In his letter, Dr. King defends the strategy of nonviolent resistance to violence. In this rhetorical analysis the writer will analyze the rhetoric devices used by Dr. King.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates, more than most, ought to be as per this agreement, as he has carried on seventy years completely content with the Athenian lifestyle. If Socrates somehow managed to break from jail now, having so reliably approved the social contract, he would be making himself a bandit who might not be welcome in some other enlightened state for whatever is left of his life. Furthermore, when he bites the dust, he will be cruelly judged in the underworld for carrying on shamefully towards his city's laws. Subsequently, Socrates persuades Crito that it would be better not to endeavor a getaway.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anthem Literary Analysis

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Anthem, the protagonist, Equality, lives in a society where it is illegal to have an ego. Every aspect of their life is controlled by the ruling government. Essentially they are all robots. The government had not only stripped the protagonist of his basic human rights but they also had dehumanized all citizens of this post-apocalyptic civilization. Equality makes a justifiable response to the human rights infringement by fleeing into the forest to escape the tyranny.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a citizen in a country you must obey the laws of the land and not be a troublemaker in society. For Martin Luther King Jr, Crito and Socrates, they have different views on how to do things as a citizen; King wants to disobey laws in order to end racism in the south, Crito wants to get Socrates out of jail, and Socrates wants to serve his death sentence because that’s what he believes is the right thing to do. In Birmingham, Alabama, in 1963 Martin Luther King was locked up in a jail cell for protesting peacefully against discrimination. While sitting in his cell, King wrote an open letter to tell people that it is morally right to disobey laws that seem unfair and take direct action rather than waiting for the courts to do something about…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this next section Martin Luther King Jr. makes the argument that some laws meant to be broken; to do so he, defines just and unjust laws and also provides proper examples. King defines just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law;” it is a law that is equally upheld by both majority and minority groups (804). He goes on to define unjust laws as “any law that degrades human personality” (804). By accurately defining the difference between just and unjust laws, it sets up the tone for his argument on why it is acceptable to support some laws and disobey others. He wishes to convey the idea that just because a law is put in place by a government, that does not always deem them reasonable and without corruption.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society as it promotes the creation and the retention of a free country. Free societies are often considered more advanced than the oppressive ones because freedom is something that evolved out of oppression. Now, in the modern world, governments are more or less established, and for them to be changed, the people must act. Civil disobedience is woven through the fabric of the United States. The Revolutionary war granted the underdog colonies independence-- not just independence but freedom.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the topic of laws, most of us will readily agree that breaking the laws is unjust. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of if there is ever a time when a law can acceptably be broken. Whereas some are convinced that laws should never be broken, others maintain that there are some instances where laws should be broken. Socrates and Antigone would agree with the statement that disobeying laws is never the answer. Likewise, I have always believed that breaking the laws should be punishable and should never be done.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Vs Law Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates and Antigone vs. the Law The proclivity for people to challenge the law has been a topic of discussion for thousands of years. In Plato’s Crito, Greek Philosopher Socrates explains his point of view on the subject in which he chooses to abide by the law, even if he knows that he will be executed. Antigone, a main character from Sophocles’ play of the same name, contradicts Socrates’ ideas and clarifies her belief that one should rebel against authority according to their own justice.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King believes that the obligations of the citizen are to break unjust laws and take direct action rather than waiting for the courts to bring justice. He believes one should demand political and economic justice from the government or an area in which they live. During the time King was alive, racial issues were huge to the point where segregation among Caucasians and African Americans were enforced. Along with segregation, many acts of violence were also inflicted upon African Americans –especially lynching. Such acts require people to stand up and end the immoral ways of the majority.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Crito, a dialogue written by Plato, the Greek philosopher Socrates is sentenced to death because of corrupting the youth, creating new gods, and being an atheist. Centuries later, another prominent figure, Martin Luther King, Jr., is jailed for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963. When questioned of their imprisonment, Plato and King, Jr. are both determined to maintain justice despite the injustices charged against them, but for Plato, justice means upholding the law at all costs since one should do no wrong, whereas King is concerned with reforming the law, therefore doing wrong could make a “right”. To both King and Socrates, a portion of injustice in law damages justice as a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is another law that was passed six months after it was ruled that banning same sex couples was unconstitutional, and it was called Proposition 8. Same sex couples are trying to get “the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state just six months after a court ruled that preventing gays and lesbians from marrying was unconstitutional” (Jost). These laws cause a constant race to create and destroy laws; that deal with the ability for same sex couples to get married and for the people who believe that same sex marriage is wrong to refuse that…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays