Is Torture Wrong

Improved Essays
If torture will be the only way to obtain information to prevent the detonation of the atomic bomb in Times Square , torture should be and most likely will be used. What is more important? Human rights terrorists or protecting the lives of our citizens?

The Church does not accept torture, two main reasons are: one is human dignity , which prohibits using it in any case . The second is the dignity of the human body . But what to do if a terrorist staying in prison has valuable information about the attack , about which we know only that is to take place tomorrow at the mall ? Torture could be justified only if there is a moral certainty that the bomb will explode a particular day, and the man has information that could prevent an attack ,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dialawar Torture Effects

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dialawar was an Afghan detainee who was beaten,sleep deprived and chained up for 5 unrelenting days until he died. However, it was later discovered that Dilawar had no connection to the rocket attack that he was apprehended for. ( No torture,2008). Due to the C.I.A.’s misidentification of who Dilawar was mistaken for his last days were horrible and unjust. Unfortunately, the damage was already done.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same time the opponents of these methods were convinced that one individual could not be an organizer of so many terrorist plots and revealed their skepticism in relation to his claims. They stated that taking into consideration the types of tortures, which could be applied to an individual, there is never a guarantee that his confessions are true to life and were not made purely with the aim to stop tortures and remain alive. This argument makes everybody doubt as for effectiveness of tortures. “For instance, a torture victim deprived of his clothes will feel so “ashamed and humiliated and cold,” said retired FBI counterterrorism agent Dan Coleman, “he 'll tell you anything you want to hear to get his clothing back. There 's no value in it.”…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “A Case for Torture,” Michael Levin makes the erroneous claim that torture is permissible because he does not address the countless legal issues connected to the controversy. Instead of choosing to include verifiable facts that disprove the legitimacy of torture, Levin manipulates his readers’ emotions through the use of pathos, the fabrication of improbable tragedies, and unsourced studies. Levin’s “A Case for Torture” is purposely flawed in hopes of convincing his audience to join him in advocating for…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, I believe only God has the power to do the right justice to those terrorists. So who are we to judge? My first reason why I believe terrorists do not deserve to be tortured is that they might be forced into it. They could be a part of a hierarchy that has control over them.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After reading this article, I believe that the author had provided enough evidence on whether or not torture would be beneficial or if it would lead to a slippery slope tragedy that would go against what they were trying to accomplish. In essence, I believe that having a torture system would only have a negative outcome and Liberal democracies should refrain from using such systems since preventing massive global issues could be more important than killing potential terrorists to protect innocent residents. Throughout the text presented the main idea…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Shue argues that idealization in the ticking time bomb scenario eliminates reality, such that you do not know what the person knows, about what you are wanting to get out of them. The ticking time bomb justification assumes that the person will hold out during the torture, will not lie to stop the torturing, and will be effective in the short time being. The ticking time bomb scenario abstracts how torturers become. Torturers need to use effective means; a bureaucracy needs to be created for training. The realistic problem with the legalization of torture for terrorists is that there are 2 types of guys that exist.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons why the torture shouldn’t be legal. For example, what if the suspected bomber, isn’t the mastermind behind the whole plan. If the person tries to tell the police that, they obviously won’t believe the person and torture them worse. Another reason why it shouldn’t be legal is, what if the suspected bomber decides to not tell the police anything. If the suspected bomber is willing to die to make sure the plan is accomplished, then not only did the police kill someone, they also wasted time that could’ve been spent searching for the…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Water Torture

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue of whether or not torture is an effective and appropriate means of extracting information from subjects has been pondered for centuries. More so than ever before, the interrogation tactics used by the CIA after September 11, 2001 have been the subject of intense scrutiny. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the CIA ramped up its efforts to acquire human intelligence information deemed vital to United States national security. The compelling need to acquire information important to national security was not adequately balanced against the need to respect basic human rights. Further, the highly controversial interrogation methods employed on potential suspects linked to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin makes it clear that torture should not be used as punishment, but as a way to prevent future terror. No terrorist victim should lose his or her life just because America considers torture as unethical. One example Michael provided was when former president Roosevelt faced an ethical dilemma; in 1943 he could have had Hitler killed but did not based on ethical grounds. However, in this time period Americans now see that if he would have had him killed the war would have ended, and many lives would have been saved. A different time Levin also appealed to the audience’s logical reasoning was when he said torture was justified since “unlike his victims, he volunteered for the risks of his deed.”…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays