Is Torture Ever Justified Essay

Improved Essays
Show More
The first reason torture should be justified is as followed: the use of torture can save lives and prevent future acts of terrorism. Through the process of torture, the US, was able to distinguish connections between Khalid Sheik Muhammed and Jose Padilla. The use of torture was conducted on al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah. Khalid Sheik Muhammed and Jose Padilla are two international terrorists that have committed terrorist actions m42k.p against the United States. When Khalid Sheik Mohammed was taken by the US in Pakistan, the use of torture gave the US new intel on new crimes that were being planned against the US. ISIS has 3,500 slaves in their possession right now. Over a five year period, more than 250,000 people have died in Syria. 18,802 citizens were killed in a 21-month period in Iraq. By catching the people that have links to them and using torture they will give up information that can help to stop this horrific terror. Studies have shown that torture has worked and many people have came out and said it has worked. For example, Dick Cheney came out said said that torture has saved American lives. Dick Cheney was the Vice President under …show more content…
Rabbi Brad Hirschfield said torture has more goals then finding the location of the bomb. He goes onto say that torture is being used for the wrong intention. This is not saving anyone life if you want to torture someone for no reason. Torture can be used against an innocent man that has nothing to do with the investigation. Instead of saving innocent lives you have just taken one if you torture an innocent man. Torturing an innocent man doesn't happen that often. The investigations, that are conducted, are detailed processes so it fair to say that most of the times they will have the right person. Torture is used when they know they have the right man and torture has been proven to work in many situations that saved thousands of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Torture Daniel Hill Summary
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Torture Daniel Hill Summary

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Interrogation
    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Interrogation

    The government is known to do controversial actions when it comes to interrogation. The most controversial tactic is torture treatment. Torture treatment has always been around, but there have always been issues with it. The main issue is, is it constitutional? The eighth amendment states that no one is subject to cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dershowitz, And Michael Levin's The Case Of Torture?
    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dershowitz, And Michael Levin's The Case Of Torture?

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Levin The Case For Torture
    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Levin The Case For Torture

    Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Torture In The 20th Century
    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture In The 20th Century

    (Parry 2010). There are other cases, when people, who are so much committed to their religious ideology for example, would prefer to die because of pain or injures and would not agree to talk. In such cases tortures could also be hardly considered to be effective, as they practically lead to a murder of an individual and nothing more. Often tortures are seen as rather effective as preventive means, when they are applied towards dissidents or guerrillas with the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary
    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary

    The best Way to Deal with Terrorists Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Enhanced Interrogation
    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Enhanced Interrogation

    Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Bowden Torture
    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Bowden Torture

    There is a thin line between torture, coercion, and persuasion. For some countries, torture is an adequate form of punishment used to not only instill fear, but to also show the consequences of prohibited actions to others. However, for the United States and other countries who have signed the Geneva Convention, torture is strictly prohibited, but is still practiced in different forms. The article “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” written by Mark Bowden, explores various interrogation techniques used throughout the War on Terror by the United States Military, the Israeli government, and the New York City Police force. Each of the agencies consistently agreed that using “hard torture” was “the classic shortcut for a lazy or incompetent investigator”(…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Waterboarding
    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Waterboarding

    With the infliction of pain on individuals endangering the U.S., it creates a deterrent or a scare tactic towards other nations ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism."). The idea of torture strikes fear into the hearts of terrorist subjects because it can be brutal when they fail to comply. This fear deterrent now creates a robust and powerful figure for the United States, in that no organization or terrorist has any desire to attack a country that will get all information needed, and one can either suffer or give away vital information of their associates ("Torture Is a Just Means of Preventing Terrorism)". This idea may seem completely immoral to some, however needs to be accepted. The idea of war is immensely immoral, however it is inevitable at different times throughout history.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis
    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture Debate Analysis

    After reading this article, I believe that the author had provided enough evidence on whether or not torture would be beneficial or if it would lead to a slippery slope tragedy that would go against what they were trying to accomplish. In essence, I believe that having a torture system would only have a negative outcome and Liberal democracies should refrain from using such systems since preventing massive global issues could be more important than killing potential terrorists to protect innocent residents. Throughout the text presented the main idea…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Utilitarianism
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Utilitarianism

    There are many reasons why the torture shouldn’t be legal. For example, what if the suspected bomber, isn’t the mastermind behind the whole plan. If the person tries to tell the police that, they obviously won’t believe the person and torture them worse. Another reason why it shouldn’t be legal is, what if the suspected bomber decides to not tell the police anything. If the suspected bomber is willing to die to make sure the plan is accomplished, then not only did the police kill someone, they also wasted time that could’ve been spent searching for the…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture
    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Is It Morally Justifiable To Torture
    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is It Morally Justifiable To Torture

    Ethics Article Assignment Scenario: 1) I do agree with torture because of how desperate the situation is. If it was my choice to choose between torturing one man or having the guilt of hundreds of people’s death on my hands, I would rather choose to torture the man to find the bomb. It will not be morally justifiable to torture the bomber’s wife to make the bomber talk, as she may not have known about his plans. Until officials are 100% sure that the wife was also in on the bombing plan, they should not torture his wife till then. 2) Knowing that torturing a person is illegal, I would try and find an alternate way to make the bomber talk to the officials, to say where the bomb was planted.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos, And Logos In Michael Levin's 'The Case For Torture'
    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pathos, And Logos In Michael Levin's 'The Case For Torture'

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentation In Michael Levin's 'The Case For Torture'
    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentation In Michael Levin's 'The Case For Torture'

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings