Julie-Anne Davies Arguments Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
When it comes to the topic of Euthanasia most of us will readily agree that it can be a good thing for those who are terminally ill. Where the argument usually ends however is on the question of if a person would be euthanized because they were depressed or because they have a terminal illness. Whereas some are convinced that it is wrong to be euthanized in both situations. Others maintain that a terminally ill patient should be allowed to be euthanized. My own view in the topic is that if a person is terminally ill they should be able to be euthanized and not have to suffer any longer. When we think about people being alive there are many things that come to mind such as are they breathing, does their brain have any activity going on, and …show more content…
In an article called Choosing to End a Life by Julie-Anne Davies which says "Fear of being in pain , but also the indignity of being trapped in a body which no longer functions but where the brain is as active as ever, can transform the most law abiding and conservative citizens into Fugitives" (Davies 2). Basically what Davies is saying is that if we were to legalize euthanasia for those who are terminally ill or have a rare disease that will kill …show more content…
They will have many reasons as to why they believe that it is wrong such as religious reasons or that they believe life is sacred and that it shouldn’t be taken away no matter what. In some cases like the one in the article Active Euthanasia Is Never Morally Justified by Doug McManaman “It is never justified to intentionally bring an end to human life in order to relieve one of a burdensome existence” (McManaman). What McManaman is saying here is basically that it is not right for a person to end their life no matter what they are going through or how they feel in this case. He uses the word burdensome as anything that makes someone uncomfortable that gets in their way of living with this article. These people who argue to keep euthanasia illegal don’t know what the patients are going through and they should realize that the patient knows what is best for them. They also should think about if they were in as much pain as the patient is how they would respond to it because they may think that they would just stick it out, but in the end they might choose the same thing that these patients are choosing because the pain is bad or because they can’t stand just waiting and sitting around doing nothing when they know they are dying. People should realize that as long as it doesn’t affect them or their loved one and isn’t harming a mass amount of people that there is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to research, some 66% of U.S. adults believe that a doctor or nurse should allow a patient to die in certain circumstances…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachel’s argues against The Difference Thesis he says that the issue of active and passive euthanasia is not a morally relevant problem: there is no moral difference between killing and letting die (863-864). He believes that killing is not always worse than letting die. Rachel’s argument has exceptional impact on one’s ideas. He uses an example of two men Smith and Jones. Smith will inherit a large sum of money if something fatal were to happen to his 6 year .old…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pro-euthanasia movement maintains that our rights include determining the time and manner of our own death. Given the fact that people die unexpectedly every day of both natural and accidental causes, this philosophy is patently absurd. If, however, one simply considers the so-called right to choose death when suffering is too great, then we have to ask the question of what kind of suffering qualifies. In contrast, people who disagree to allow euthanasia say that if the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, Abrupt death such as being stabbed in a robbery or being killed in a traffic accident gives us a chance to think about life or death. In other words, in those cases, we have no choice to decide our fate. However, the dying process due to a terminal illness is different from those cases. Such a situation will make our thoughts more chilled, so we will become completely level - headed persons. No one will decide death instantaneously.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia “Assisted Suicide” In recent discussion of euthanasia, a controversial issue has been whether it should be an option for terminally ill patients. On the one hand, some argue that it is wrong for physicians to help or perform this act on patients who want to die. From this perspective it is wrong to assist someone to die, because they could have a chance to recover. On the other hand, however, others argue that it is up to the patient.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People have the right to make "important decisions about their lives for themselves according to their own values or conceptions of a good life, and in being left free to act on these decisions" (Brock 227). This allows people to take responsibility over their own lives as long as the person can make decisions. “For many patients near death, maintaining the quality of one’s life, avoiding great suffering, maintaining one’s dignity, and insuring that others remember us as we wish them to become of paramount importance and outweigh merely extending one’s life” (Brock 227. Life is about quality rather than quantity. Euthanasia is highly subjective; therefore, if it was legalized, then the law should not be very specific about the type of situation that euthanasia is permitted for a patient.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On top of the pain the patient also experiences mental fatigue. By them knowing that the end is coming and the pain is only going to get worse, they start to break down and lose all hope. This is a lot for the patient and their families to endure. The choice for them to end their life early and stop the pain for both themselves and their families should be up to the patients. The grieving time will come faster and the families will not have to remember their loved ones holding on to their miserable life.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intro to Euthanasia,suicide, and Double doctrine It may come to no surprise to you that the topic of euthanasia and assisted suicide are controversial issues. It makes sense why it would cause controversy when people ask to end their lives of their own accord. However despite suicide having a negative connotation, euthanasia is a much more complicated issue. While people wish to have their loved ones alive, the patient who is suffering may not desire to keep going on with their life due to suffering or the lack of actual function.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patients facing a painful death due to terminal illness still deserve the right to choose. When a patient request euthanasia or physician assisted suicide, it is important to find out the underlining reasons for this decision and make all means available to relieve the pain and other discomforting symptoms before resorting to euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. A medical evaluation should be given to anyone considering these options in order to determine whether the patient is mentally competent to fully understand the choice they are making, as well as determining the severity of their illness to see if it is in fact life threatening. The unbearable suffering may be due to inadequate palliative care support or inadequate pain relief (Oxford 2002). Therefore, the safeguard measure is to improve the palliative care (Oxford 2002).…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We live in the year 2015, and still it is illegal to grant an individual in need the right to a peaceful departure. Euthanasia offers patients the option to leave their life happier than they would have been otherwise. Furthermore, it is a decision that a patient should be given the right to in times of intense suffering, considering that it is their own life. Finally, the absence of euthanasia has denied so many the end that they have desired through years of…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who argue for euthanasia believe that it is an acceptable practice because everyone has the right to die. In addition, euthanasia relieves the elderly, cancer patients, and victims of diseases of their pain. Instead of forcing the victims of these diseases to live the rest of their lives in pain and suffering,…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also, neither the law nor medical ethics requires that "everything be done" to keep a person alive. Insistence, against the patient's wishes, that death be postponed by every means available is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays