On The Works Of Locke And Defoe: The Lockean Aspects Of Robinson Crusoe

Decent Essays
Is Robinson Crusoe a Lockean Novel?
On the Works of Locke and Defoe: The Lockean Aspects of Robinson Crusoe Proposals about how things could be in different circumstances are ultimately based in fiction. Sometimes, the claims seem rational. They stem from logical steps. However, without an actual test environment, the claims are just mere conjecture. That is not to say that fiction has no role in modern thought. Fiction, especially those striving to achieve verisimilitude, can provide an artificial environment in which one can judge the merit of various proposals and understand how it plays a role in society. The original Robinsonade, Robinson Crusoe, by author Daniel Defoe, is one such fictional account. It depicts a man stranded in nature without society, grounds for a state proposed by Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke in his work Second Treatise on Civil Government. Although the protagonist of Robinson Crusoe makes
…show more content…
He claims to and acts in a manner consistent with Locke’s proposals simply because it is all that is available to him. Given the opportunity, Crusoe is still ultimately materialistic. He makes an obscene number of trips to both moored ships for their goods (which he arguably did not produce by his own labors). He takes as much as he can, going insofar as to take dozens of dining utensils – far more than he could ever use. When finding money, he claims that it is “nasty sorry useless stuff” in his current predicament (a claim consistent with Locke’s idea of how money is entirely a social concoction and only useful within society) but nonetheless still takes it with him. At moments, Crusoe even fancies himself as lord and owner of the entire island. Here, it can be seen that Crusoe may have one set of rhetoric when thinking about the subject of ownership, but his behaviors are contrary to that Lockean rhetoric when provided the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Affective Theme Anthem by Ayn Rand is a book exploiting the evilness of collectivism as a whole. The overall theme of the book is individualism. The book follows a young man in the society (Equality) that feels this draw to be something more than what he is told, he is an individual, not a part of the collection. He himself throughout the book explores new ideas and invents and discovers new things, by himself as an individual going against the collective society. Throughout the book, this theme is not hidden, but is almost flaunting itself in front of us, making us pay give attention to it.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The famous political texts Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes and The Second Treatise of Government by John Locke have had a profound impact on what is seen to be the role of government in society, with the latter having more lasting influence, particularly in modern society. The former, in short, argues that men ought to submit themselves and all of their rights to an entity with absolute authority over them, and that no matter how this man, or assembly of men abuses its power, they ought not to resist this entity, as the alternative is a chaotic, violent world. Just by examining the thesis of Hobbes’ work, one would easily deduce that such an idea is contrary to the ideals lauded in our modern society, those being of certain inalienable rights, the rule of law, and the separation/limitation of powers. Locke presents each of these aforementioned ideals and explains them to be essential to governance for the common good.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For a while, the constraints of civilized society keep things peaceful, but soon their system unravels into brutal chaos” (Pojman, 67-68), this is an excerpt that Pojman discussed pertaining to the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding. This quote exemplifies Thomas Hobbes idea on the state of nature and how there can be no structure and stability without a governing force. Another philosopher that challenges Hobbes’ ideas is John Locke, who believes humans would be capable of keeping stability and structure without the social contract to the government. I will prove how Hobbes’ idea is significantly better than Locke’s theory by talking about equality, liberty, rights and morality. I completely agree with Thomas Hobbes and how humans would be incapable of governing themselves which is why we need social structure.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting off, they each had a distinctive understanding of human nature from one another. To Rousseau, humans in primitive times were "noble savages" and it is "civilization" that turned man into a "beast". Conversely, Hobbes believed that being "civilized" is a positive trait and being uncivilized or a "savage" is bad. Concerning human nature, Rousseau theorized that humans were innately good and generous, before being corrupted by the vices of civilization. Human life was most likely peaceful and compassionate as described in his opening line, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Any and all progress in a society has its roots in individual people breaking away and demanding change. Without these differing views that promote discussion and innovation, we will be left blinded by by the rules already set before us by others, not daring to think outside the lines. The novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury contains just such a society, where all contradictory ideas and the books that held them have been gradually destroyed and banned, till none remain accessible to the common person. Free thought is no longer taught in schools, and human beings have been reduced to identical unthinking beings unaware of their own decline. The only way to regain true freedom and self-identity is to attain the courage to refuse to mindlessly…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What if in our world, knowledge was limited and nobody could truly connect with anybody on a personal level? Well, in the society of the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, both of these things are happening. The society created in the book and our society today may look and sound very different, yet that’s not all there is to it. In many ways, this supposed “utopian” society of Fahrenheit 451 and our society that we live in today are very different, nonetheless, the two also have their similarities and are alike in many different ways.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau strongly differ on their view of the purpose of the state. Hobbes sees the state as a positive institution that creates order and sows peace. Rousseau sees the state as an institution of chains, that renders it’s citizens salves to the will of the majority. Before reaching these conclusions they argue on the base nature of man. Hobbes argues that self preservation is the base of human nature whereas Rousseau argues it is property.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man and the state of nature have varied and contrast immensely throughout different societies. Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau’s ideas about the state of man clash in the form of politics and social contracts. Locke’s view involves the power residing within the people, and the government is there to protect their property, life, and liberty. Hobbes’ ideas are in favor of a monarchy in order to keep the citizens secure and free from harm. Rousseau’s ideas on the politics shares a collective will amongst the population.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The act of translation is an inherently derivative act, while simultaneously giving the author a new agency over the material. The translator becomes the new works author, in this case a translation of the Psalms of David translated by Anne Locke. The piece was distributed anonymously, so the credibility of the author’s work cannot lie with reputation, but with literary talent. An author can prove their intellect and the importance of their work to the audience through alluding to classical literary traditions, demonstrating their authority over the subject matter.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Rousseau offers an unrealistic and damaging account of human nature” critically respond to this statement with reference to either Hobbes or Machiavelli. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a political philosopher who has made a great impact on the area of politics. Even though his perspectives are utopian and are different to both Hobbes and Machiavelli. His contribution has made a significant impact in the way that politics is conceived. Therefore, it is the contention of this essay by using Machiavelli’s ideology to expose that Rousseau's ideas about human nature are utopian and in a sense damaging for the society.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robinson Crusoe can be considered a spiritual autobiography, a story of a man’s spiritual pilgrimage, from reprobate through regret and faith to devout man of God. Indeed, it is possible to trace Robinson’s progress from a state of sin to a state of grace, “a rebellion-punishment-repentance-deliverance sequence described from the earliest moment of Christendom as characteristic of fallen men who are accorded God’s grace” (Hunter 252). The spiritual autobiography usually includes some elements that are typical of the Puritan drama, known “as the drama of the soul”, which many scholars consider “educational, inspiring, and productive of greater piety and higher morality” (Hunter 251-252). Consequently, Crusoe serves the purpose of demonstrating…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Life and Adventures of Robinson Crusoe, an 18th-century novel by Daniel Defoe, written in 1719, and set in the mid-17th-century, revolves around the protagonist Robinson Crusoe, an unassuming middle-class man from York, England, who’s heart desires the rush of sailing the great sea. Though the idea of sailing is opposed by his family, behind their back he travels with his friend to London from Humber in September 1651. While sailing, a storm forms, causing the ship to nearly founder. While the vessel is saved, Crusoe is shaken. However, even with the storm’s treat, he still goes on a merchant expedition, afterward, but ends up captured by pirates but is saved and sails onward to Brazil.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays