The Death Penalty Analysis

Superior Essays
Imagine you are walking through a park by yourself and you stumble upon a wallet. There is no one else in the park and no surveillance cameras to capture your every move. Upon further investigation, you open the wallet to find a relatively hefty sum of cash, along with identification of the wallet’s owner. With no one around, you could easily put the wallet in your pocket and continue on your way. You would have all of that money to yourself and no one would ever know that you kept it. On the flip side, you could just as easily take the wallet back to its rightful owner since the address is provided on the ID. You wouldn’t end up with the cash, but you would receive the satisfaction of doing the right thing. That is the central theme of this chapter: what motivates us as humans to act …show more content…
Those who follow a religion are often moral because of said religion. For Christians, they act morally because of the promise of Heaven, and they refrain from acting immorally because of the threat of Hell. More specifically, I was attracted to the relationship between religion and capital punishment. Despite most major Christian denominations actively opposing the death penalty, approximately 80% of Christians support it. This seems conflicting to me. Why do some, if not most, Christians arguably follow their churches blindly and go along with the values of their churches, yet at the same time oppose a major moral stance of the church? I have seen many times where followers of the Catholic Church, and other denominations for that matter, base their values off the values of the Church, and nothing more. They put no independent thought or reasoning into their values. If the church says it’s right, then it’s right. And if the church says it’s wrong, then it’s wrong. I suppose what is so interesting to me about all this is, why choose capital punishment to disagree with the church

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the book Capital Punishment by Michael Kronenwetter . He talks about how capital punishment was favorable for our country. He explained the power of the death sentence and how it helped the government and the people of the United States. He explained how the capital punishment was a deterrent for people. That anyone who would think about committing a murder would think before because they would be afraid of the consequence.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What sorts of words come to mind when you hear the words death penalty: murder, termination, and expiration? Maybe the words that come to mind are: justified, validate, or tolerable. “The Death Penalty” by David Bruck was written in 1985, as a counter argument to another essay. In his essay, Bruck discusses different points to support the death penalty. Twenty-six years later, in 2011, two men named Zachary Shemtob and David Lat wrote an essay called, “Executions Should Be Televised”.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “A Strong Argument Against Capital Punishment”, Lincoln Caplan expands upon Connecticut's recent choices about capital punishment. Connecticut is one of several states in the United States that brought the issue of capital punishment to the Supreme Court for debate and discussion. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the death penalty is unconstitutional in the state of Connecticut. In this debate, the Democratic legislative side leaned against capital punishment; while the Republican legislative side leaned towards capital punishment. The Democratic side reasons that the death penalty violates the state constitution against excessive punishments.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ambiguity of Capital Punishment Punishment has always and continues to be a corrective plan of action for violations that range from a minor assault to murder. In the case of capital punishment – a process of sentencing convicted offenders to death for the most serious crimes (capital crimes)(bsj.gov), punishment for such crimes can range from lengthy prison time to death penalty sentencing. The citing below will delve into the justification or lack thereof on how this kind of punishment is administered through the justice systems in states that carry out death penalties. Lewis E Laws gives a personal account of his over 20 years of experience and observations of murderers in questioning the consistency of the law as it relates to the morphing…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scenario 1 Being on the parole board puts you in positions that require you to make life changing decisions for a variety of people. You have the final decision for the inmate trying to get their life on the right path and also the responsibility to look out for the best interest of the public. Releasing a dangerous individual that’s likely to reoffend can cause numerous of problems later on down the road which may include lawsuits and potential loss of job. Every decision a parole member makes has to be made with a strong conviction that the offender will not reoffend. They have to take into consideration, “primarily the risk to the public of a further offence being committed at a time when the prisoner would otherwise be in prison and whether…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article was written to inform the public that lethal injections should be televised or made for public viewing since our tax money is being used to conduct it. During an execution there is are a limited number of people present and the media gives an account of what takes place when a person is put to death. Since video-taping is mandatory on debates, rulings, interrogations, and confessions, why not at lethal injections. The decision could strengthen the support to abolish executions or add support to the family’s of the victims that need the closure that the execution brings them. There is no right or wrong way to justify the victims death to the public.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    More so, religion did more harm than good, promoting immoral behavior as long as the bible is followed. Although Twain critiques the hypocrisy of society as a cause of immoral behavior, religion is actually more responsible for the immoral behavior as demonstrated through the failure to adhere to religious teaching, the justification of slavery, and the fact that superstition is more rational than religion. Although society is hypocritical to those who do not follow a religion saying they are immoral, they themselves fail to practice what they…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Thesis

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, remains one of the most controversial topics in the United States of America. Two parties are usually at odds with this issue. People who believe that the death penalty is moral and people who think it is immoral. The government and prisons are the biggest advocates for keeping the death penalty. The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty are an organization whose main goal, just like their name says, to completely remove the death penalty from state laws.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Williams Dr. Wenneker ENGWR 300 1 March 2018 Death Penalty, Right or Wrong? Do bad people deserve to die? This question has and still is being debated ever since humans beings discovered the power of thinking for ourselves in a logical manner. In today’s society, most people feel that they must maintain the appearance of what society considers acceptable when in public. When in public, a person may be asked a very important question that reflects their mannerisms.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the debate “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Robert Blecker argues against the motion. He concludes that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for extreme crimes. His examples of extreme cases include terrorists, mass murderers of vulnerable victims (especially children), rapist murderers, contract killers, and torture killers. According to Mr. Blecker the other option for punishment, life without parole, does not fit the crime in these extreme cases.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Participation of physicians in state-ordered executions has become controversial especially in the medical ethics in the US. For the last twenty years, the use of lethal injection has been the main method of execution and capital punishment. In the past executioners used were firing squads, electrocution, hanging, and gas asphyxiation in addition to lethal injection (Gawande 131-34). The lethal injection is the widely preferred method by courts as the most humane, which does not contravene the eighth amendment provisions acting against cruel death and inhumane forms of punishment. Medical knowledge is vital in the execution through lethal injections to ensure the correct effective application of the procedure.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, morality is often influenced by religion by making people think they will be punished after they die for doing certain…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bethany young Persuasive writing p.2 Have you ever stole anything that was someone else’s stuff but you real wanted it? Well this is going to tell you why stealing is wrong.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many non-religious people argue that morality does not need any foundation in religious belief. What is considered virtuous or sinful in many religions is purely what any human being – with good judgement – would consider being right or wrong. Morality in religion takes the guise of a reward system: do something good and you will be rewarded, do something bad and you will be punished. Even Socrates could find flaws in the religious occupied territory of morality. “Power doesn’t corrupt people, people corrupt…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays