Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively a free society? In my opinion I believe that peaceful resistance is a negative impact. I mean peaceful resistance can go both ways. Lets say there is a group of people protesting on the streets and its okay for them to do it, then they don't have a problem. But lets say there is someone who see's whats going on and they start making chaos in a peaceful situation, then that's when there is a negative impact. I think its a negative impact for peaceful resisitance to laws in a free society. A reason I think its negative is because people can find a way to keep arguing and make more problems. Yes it may be peaceful but a random person can interrupt it and make more of a mess to the
…show more content…
"No society whether free or tyrannical can give its citizens the "right" to break the law." I totally agree with statement an I'm pretty sure other people would agree also. There is no right to the break the law because you will get into trouble you probably can't get out of sometimes. The laws are there for a reason so you shouldn't break them. You don't have to obey the laws but I really think you should follow because you don't know what might happen. The government has respect for the people except when certain people don't follow the rules like how they are supposed too. One last reason I think peaceful resistance is negative is because some bad don't follow rules in a free society. Some people out in the world just don't listen to what they should be following. The person probably not listening is a bad person just trying to cause problems. I mean there could be a peaceful resistance to laws but one person just always tries to make things worse in a society that doesn't have that much problems. Rules are there for a reason but we just have those people who don't listen to what the government. In conclusion I believe that peaceful resistance to laws has a negative impact to a free society. When there is free society, there is always that one person that always tries to cause a problem. It may be peaceful at times but other times ts just an excuse for people
"No society whether free or tyrannical can give its citizens the "right" to break the law." I totally agree with statement an I'm pretty sure other people would agree also. There is no right to the break the law because you will get into trouble you probably can't get out of sometimes. The laws are there for a reason so you shouldn't break them. You don't have to obey the laws but I really think you should follow because you don't know what might happen. The government has respect for the people except when certain people don't follow the rules like how they are supposed too. One last reason I think peaceful resistance is negative is because some bad don't follow rules in a free society. Some people out in the world just don't listen to what they should be following. The person probably not listening is a bad person just trying to cause problems. I mean there could be a peaceful resistance to laws but one person just always tries to make things worse in a society that doesn't have that much problems. Rules are there for a reason but we just have those people who don't listen to what the government. In conclusion I believe that peaceful resistance to laws has a negative impact to a free society. When there is free society, there is always that one person that always tries to cause a problem. It may be peaceful at times but other times ts just an excuse for people