Is Nuclear Energy Future, Or In A Death Spiral?

Decent Essays
Has the world grown so dependent upon nuclear power energy that it ignores the price tag? Power reaped from nuclear energy by heating and pressuring water is known as nuclear power. Controversies surrounding nuclear power come in various forms, however, the financial aspect is grand. In their recent work, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a nonprofit organization composed of numerous scientists, discovered actual costs of implementing nuclear power as an energy source. Within the article Is Nuclear Power Our Energy Future, Or in a Death Spiral?, author Dave Levitan paraphrases UCS's findings as, "the price tag for a new nuclear power plant jumped from between US$2 billion and US$4 billion in 2002 all the way [to] US$9 billion in 2008.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Americans, and the rest of the world, should switch to nuclear power because it produces great amounts of energy with little to no waste, is constantly available and reusable, and nuclear energy is safe. Nuclear energy provides great amounts of energy with very little amounts of nuclear material. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch(died on the fifteenth of may in 2015) said that “one pound of uranium, which is about the size of my fingertip, would produce the same amount of energy as five thousand barrels of oil.” Now in one forty-two gallon barrel of oil there is five point eight million btu(british thermal units), one btu would raise a pot of water one degree. Multiply five point eight million by five thousand, and you get…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fuoco 1 Cole Fuoco Mrs. Bedell English 10H 10 January 2016 Nuclear Fusion: The Energy Solution It seems like science fiction saying that a city like San Francisco can achieve all of its power needs for a year with only a couple hundred gallons of water, but it true with the incredible power of nuclear fusion. As humans in our ongoing society we are always striving to save a pretty penny, embrace efficiency, and preserve the planet from our harmful pollution. However, it seems as if the human race is quite substantive with their decision to refrain from making the giant leap forward to the holy grail of energy.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he is inaccurate because in “The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power”, it discusses about the additional expenses of nuclear power since “Other aspects of nuclear power, such as the pollution from uranium mining, risks from nuclear weapons proliferation, dangers of reactor accidents, and the legacy of radioactive waste, are further hidden costs.” This demonstrates that constructing a nuclear reactor is highly priced, along with numerous other requirements that necessitate funds. Additionally, nuclear power generates harmful risks towards humans. Based on…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Topic: Nuclear Energy Thesis: While nuclear energy has many benefits, the negative implications must be considered. " Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know. "…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are many opinions on nuclear power. Opponents say that nuclear power reactors release radiation in the air, causing a lot of danger, but supporters say it produces less pollution. I think Nuclear power shouldn't be passed in the United States because it takes a long time, nuclear accidents , and it attracts terrorist. Nuclear power uses fission to make electricity.fission is the splitting of a heavy nucleus into two lighter nuclei. Fission generates heat to produce steam, then it’s used by a turbine generator to make electricity.(Duke 2016)…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the progress and energy independence frame promote nuclear power with the former presenting it as essential and beneficial, particularly in terms of technological and economic advancement, and the latter promoting it as a solution to dependence on foreign sources of energy. Counter to these are another five frames that criticise the use of nuclear power. Soft paths view it as environmentally hazardous, promoting greener energy, lifestyle changes and conservation as solutions while runaway is extremely negative yet resigned to its use. The no public accountability frame criticises regulation and both commercial and government management of the energy source while the not cost effective frame questions the economic benefit, particularly in comparison to the risks involved. Finally, the devil’s bargain frame presents nuclear power as a dilemma, recognising the benefits but believing there will ultimately be a huge price to pay.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear power is one of the cheapest forms of energy compared to other sources such as oil and coal. According to studies done by professor Nolan E, Hertel, professor of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, the cost of producing nuclear energy as of 2007 was 1.7 cents per kilowatt hour compared to 2.4 cents for coal, 6.7 cents for natural gas, and 10.2 cents for oil. However does this affordability come at a cost? According to Max Schulz at the center for Energy Policy and the Environment at the Manhattan Institute, there has not been a single accident or fatality involving exposure or harm at a nuclear power plant since the start of their operations in the United States (MI). When compared to the average of 200 accidental deaths per year at coal and natural gas powered plants, not including respiratory issues, its record is impeccable (Lehr).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My third source was a link found on the bottom page of my second source; the third source was a joint report between the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency. It gives a complete analysis of uranium such as the supply, demand and even national reports on the resources, production and exploration of uranium in different countries. This information will be utilized in the aspect of statistics on which countries use nuclear power and which do not. At this point in my research I needed to changed my search criteria from the positives of nuclear energy, and alternative fuel for the plants to the cost of building and running a nuclear plant. This change in search criteria led me to my fourth source, which was written by Ian Schultz.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Coal Argumentative Essay

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Because it’s very profitable, these power plants can produce energy for a very cheap price. These power plants on average produce about 3 times more profits than their initial cost. On top of that, it creates good paying jobs for nuclear engineers for an annual wage of $102,950 on average according to Department of Labor. On top of this, nuclear reactors are only refueled about once every 18 months, and uranium consist of only 30% of the operating cost. Meaning that nuclear energy prices are far less volatile and therefor are very consistent unlike many of its…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I'm not trying to be pro-nuclear, I'm just pro-arithmetic” said David MacKay, while trying to explain that this was the only option at this point whether anyone liked it or not. The United States is on their toes trying to figure out the best routes to go to create energy: solar and wind, coal, or nuclear. Solar and wind are found to soon die out and have nothing left to support the United States. Coal is a resource which we are running low on and soon will not be able to find, then we have nuclear which can solve most of our problems without running out. The United States should use nuclear energy, because we can recycle warheads into energy, lower the amount of waste we create, and become more efficient.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Coal, an addiction Global warming is no longer a new discovery in the scientific world. People either choose not or choose to believe in it. Countries around the world try to slow down global warming by trying to cut carbon emission. US, the biggest emitter of CO2 into the atmosphere have shown a sign to follow this trend.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Power In America

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite competition from cheap natural gas and tax-payer supported wind and solar energy, nuclear power has no equal. Among sources of electric-power generation, it plays a crucial role against the battle to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Nuclear power is one of the few technologies that can quickly combat climate change. This can cut down Global Warming by being very efficient, it can be very safe, nuclear power reduces the need for fossil fuels, and this power can be used constantly other than wind or solar energy which requires a breeze or the sun to be out. Due to ever increasing of pollution, Global Warming is impacting everyone, and nuclear power is the only way to stop it.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays