The article, “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?” written by Mark Bittman on September 24, 2011, and was published by the New York Times. The article evaluates whether junk food is really beneficial and cheaper than home-cooked meals. Bittman explains that fast food is more expensive and unhealthy than food freshly cooked at home. Most people happen to develop an addiction to fast food after consuming it for an extended period of time. Several individuals believe that fast food chains sell cheap food; the claims still need to be proven by the companies selling these food items. The population with lower income is usually the one that ends up suffering due to claims and rumors whether fast food is really cheaper or not. The article "is junk food really cheaper?" should be considered for PopMatters top prize for persuasive essay because the information provided in this essay can be beneficial to the public who like to eat on the road more often than they should.
One of the weaknesses of Bittman’s argument in the article is when he makes a claim that will lead to a domino effect. Bittman claims that “Political action would mean agitating to limit the marketing of junk; forcing its makers to pay the true costs of …show more content…
The way they have advertised has convinced the population that fast food is cheaper than a home-cooked meal. Nowadays cooking a meal at home is seen more as a job rather than an activity that could be done by the whole family. The part of the population that is affected the most by fast food is the population with lower income; they are made to believe that fast food is more convenient when it really is not. Sticking to home meals will save you more money and will keep you healthy unlike eating fast food. One of the ways Bittman’s article is successful is that it is logic and to the point, avoiding rambling or tangential arguments. This is why PopMatters should consider this article for persuasiveness
One of the weaknesses of Bittman’s argument in the article is when he makes a claim that will lead to a domino effect. Bittman claims that “Political action would mean agitating to limit the marketing of junk; forcing its makers to pay the true costs of …show more content…
The way they have advertised has convinced the population that fast food is cheaper than a home-cooked meal. Nowadays cooking a meal at home is seen more as a job rather than an activity that could be done by the whole family. The part of the population that is affected the most by fast food is the population with lower income; they are made to believe that fast food is more convenient when it really is not. Sticking to home meals will save you more money and will keep you healthy unlike eating fast food. One of the ways Bittman’s article is successful is that it is logic and to the point, avoiding rambling or tangential arguments. This is why PopMatters should consider this article for persuasiveness