Ethics In Business

Improved Essays
Is it true that the "bottom line" of business is profit and profit alone? Profit is what every business strives to be after. Profit is the measure of success. Without profit jobs could be lost, hours cut, and less benefit for employees. So it is true that the bottom line of business is profit. But there are other aspects of business. There are some businesses that do not just do it for only the money. Even though profit is still a big deal to the companies they also use process philosophy. Being all you can be to help others and never stop improving is a very good example of business philosophy. When management stops being a part of making things better and improving things, then the business would go out of business. A business philosophy needs to be something that is personal, have meaning deep inside, and something you can live by. FedEx …show more content…
They say this because it can misrepresent what is right because being relative is the opposite of being absolute. People feel that ethics in business can result in unethical actions. They feel the ethics apply only to individuals and not companies or corporations. There are a lot of businesses that operate in more than one country making it hard to have ethics. There are no absolute moral standards in a business. I feel it is hard to heave moral relativism in a business because of all the ethnic groups playing a role within it. Deontology is the ethical theory that is concerged with duties and rights. In business, employees show deontological ethics by actions and behaviors within the company and customer satisfaction. Deontology focused on the act and behavior of the employee and not on the result or consequence. An example is having a return policy at a retail store. Management could choose to honor the policy or make exemptions depending on the circumstance of a return. Ones that have a strong deontological ethic will stick to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A business’ main priority is to make money. You have no meaning to a business, merely a way to get to its end goal, maximized profit. Duska makes a clear argument for what you should be loyal too and not loyal too. He describes that a business is a different type of group, with weak, insignificant, relationships. Businesses like to make the false argument of working as a team, but Duska states “loyalty to a team is loyalty within the context of sport or a competition.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The con is the business owner may sale the business underpriced and they can be short changing themselves a large profit (Hawkey, 2002). The business owner makes to make as much money as possible on their business as possible. That is why even though there are high costs, arms length sale is the better choice because the owner can get a higher price for their business. The strategy behind an exit strategy is making the most of an investment. This is to make sure the company turns a profit, has good accounting, and has a product everyone wants.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A business that acts on social responsibility rather than shareholder interest is undermining the system of a free society. It simply is not proper or fair for a business executive to act as the judicial, legislative, and executive function all at once. The only responsibility of a business is to use its resources to engage in activities that increase profits, both for the business and its shareholders. To most, corporate social responsibility seems appealing on the surface, but the road to corporate fraud and wrongdoings can be paved with good…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This casts serious doubt onto the morality of an executive’s social responsibility, the whole concept seems more like an excuse to act with impunity rather than a moral obligation. Additionally, there is nothing to say that a corporate executive knows what is best for society, they may know very little about how their actions will affect society as a whole. Friedman also extends this line of reasoning towards the shareholders that own a company. If some of them attempt to hold a social responsibility other than to the mutual benefit of the shareholders, they are effectively imposing an unjust tax on the other shareholders and stealing their property. However, Friedman does concede that if a corporation has a sole proprietor then they are free to use their company’s resources as they see fit, as it is their personal property to do with as they see fit; however in most corporation’s (especially larger ones) this is rarely the actual situation.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1970 we have to admit that Milton was right about his writing, the only social responsibilities of the Corporate was to make profit for shareholders. Reason why Mr. Friedman argues that a corporation, unlike a person, cannot have responsibility because no one will get in business with a corporate if they realize that the corporate cannot pay its bills.” Only people can have responsibilities” and “presumably, the individuals who are to be responsible are the businessman”.so for that reason, Corporate should have a moral responsibility which is integrity and Ethics we are studying today. There are other rules that businesses must adhere to if they wish to be successful; such as the obvious rules of the marketplace including supply and demand. In addition, as we have seen with the proliferation of ‘new’ technologies, the law usually…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gibson (2000) also supports that it is not adequate for all stakeholders to be given an equal benefit because if stakeholders (other than the shareholders) are given power of influence over the business it is not fair that shareholders are not given, in return, power of influence over society’s communities and initiatives. (3) If the free-market is unable to solve social problems, the responsibility of the solutions should not befall corporate…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Someone like Milton Friedman would say that a business does not have a moral obligation to the community, but does have an obligation to maximize profits for shareholders. Some people would disagree with that and say that a business has a shared responsibility to shareholders and the community and that is what we will see argued today. (First to Debate) Milton Friedman: CSR is something known as Corporate Social Responsibility, something…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While maximizing profits is considered an important responsibility for a company to accomplish, it is not more important than fulfilling the responsibility of being socially responsible to the society in which it operates. Social responsibility can be defined as the duty of businesses to behave ethically and with sensitivity towards economic, cultural, and social issues. In other words, businesses are socially responsible when they maximize the economic, cultural, and social benefits of all their close associates such as employees, investors, and customers. When companies put all of their focus on profits, this usually brings companies repercussions such as bad reputation leading to a decrease in profits. Companies need to be both conscious of increasing their profits as well as meeting the demands of their stakeholders.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Final Sports Exam: Question 1: I consider the Nike Corporation to be an amoral employer because of the financial incentives to make the cheapest product in a capitalistic business culture. In America, the issue of moral and immoral conduct in the business world is often sidelined in favor of an amoral position on the necessity of earning the greatest profits through the lowest costs cutting measures in terms of employment. The issue of Nike sweatshops as an immoral factor in the show industry is known by executive and managers, yet they also understand the necessity of profitability and low cost work to continually grow the company. In the case of Stephen Knight, (the owner of Nike), it is important to understand the temptation of the profit…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays