Is It Morally Justifiable To Torture

Decent Essays
Ethics Article Assignment
Scenario:
1) I do agree with torture because of how desperate the situation is. If it was my choice to choose between torturing one man or having the guilt of hundreds of people’s death on my hands, I would rather choose to torture the man to find the bomb. It will not be morally justifiable to torture the bomber’s wife to make the bomber talk, as she may not have known about his plans. Until officials are 100% sure that the wife was also in on the bombing plan, they should not torture his wife till then.
2) Knowing that torturing a person is illegal, I would try and find an alternate way to make the bomber talk to the officials, to say where the bomb was planted. At the same time, knowing that hundreds of lives are at risk, I will still choose to torture the bomber if he does not say where the bomb is fast enough, due to the desperate situation.
3)
…show more content…
If I had to choose to torture one man or have hundreds die, I will rather torture the one man and face the consequences of the illegal act. Knowing that the civilians could be my family or have family of their own also makes me respond to this situation in this way.
4) These responses seem ethical as I am possibly saving hundreds of people. Although the bomber is getting injured, he isn’t going to die. Even though this action is illegal, it is probably the best method. Overall it is still ethical, as my decision to torture someone is saving many lives, even if the torture was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, I believe only God has the power to do the right justice to those terrorists. So who are we to judge? My first reason why I believe terrorists do not deserve to be tortured is that they might be forced into it. They could be a part of a hierarchy that has control over them.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Suppose a terrorist has hidden a bomb in Time’s Square which will detonate at noon on June 16 unless officials follow his demands for money and release of his friends from jail. Suppose, that he is caught at 10 a.m on that terrible day, but he would prefer death to failure. He won't tell where the bomb is. What do officials do? If they are to follow the constitutional process they would wait for his lawyer then millions of people will die.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the act-utilitarian argument for torture in ticking bomb scenarios correct? Act-Utilitarianism is the rightness of actions depending entirely on how they impact welfare or happiness. In which, the decision will be attempting to maximize both welfare and happiness. Utilitarianism sees no action as bad in itself because morality is decided by the consequences of actions. The “right thing to do” of saving the innocent is necessary to be compared and evaluated against the bad.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it right to torture people? The answer is plainly obvious to the majority of the public but not the torturer. It is said that people who torture people have a level of sadism on the part of the captor (“Private Writing”). Which causes wrong doing onto the captured to fight against or deflect pain to sustain their selves. Those who resist are given a worse treatment as to be assumed to take more punishment by the glutton sadist.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many scholars who seek to justify the use of torture use the consequentialist argument by saying the positive consequences compensate for any of the negatives. Thus saying torture is a permissible mechanism as long as torture is the lesser of two evils. In order for those who support torture to fortify and expand their stance, they depend greatly on the theoretical scenario of a ticking bomb, which was formerly thought of by an English philosopher known as Bentham (Bellamy 137). The ticking bomb argument expresses an urgent situation in which torture is essential to gather information from a terrorist about the site of a ticking bomb. In this scenario, the use of torture can be evaluated as the lesser evil in order to avert a greater evil –…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are not robots; we are not only influenced by logic but also by emotions. So it is important that we explore moral aspects of torture. This is why I went into research on the ethics behind torture. In the book, “The Ethics of Torture”, authors J. Jeremy Wisnewski and R.D Emerick argue that there is no set definition of torture. Because there are so many types of torture whether it is for interrogational purposes or for mere sadistic purposes, one can’t have a set definition for it.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin makes it clear that torture should not be used as punishment, but as a way to prevent future terror. No terrorist victim should lose his or her life just because America considers torture as unethical. One example Michael provided was when former president Roosevelt faced an ethical dilemma; in 1943 he could have had Hitler killed but did not based on ethical grounds. However, in this time period Americans now see that if he would have had him killed the war would have ended, and many lives would have been saved. A different time Levin also appealed to the audience’s logical reasoning was when he said torture was justified since “unlike his victims, he volunteered for the risks of his deed.”…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An example of this would be the ticking time bomb scenario as the information gained from torturing this terrorist would save thousands of lives at the expense of a few the effect of torture is massive not only on the receiver but the torturers as they have to give out this pain. But the lives saved are considered more valuable than the morals or a few lives. What if in the ticking time bomb scenario you couldn 't get the information from the terrorist as he was ready to die for his beliefs but you had obtained his wife and children then would the torture be justifiable? Yes even though you are torturing innocent people the information about the bombs location is far more valuable than the psyche of a few people as when we know the location of the bomb we can deactivate it saving thousands of lives.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It may be argued that what if the plane has already taken off. Then how is the terrorist supposed to disarm it? He can’t magically fly to the plane and if he is going to give instructions over the phone, then so can a member of the bomb squad. Nobody’s life should be taken for granted especially if they are innocent, but there are many alternatives to the same problem which can be easier than trying to torture someone because torturing does not guarantee he will still tell you anything. For all we know the terrorist might actually want to die so he or she was not planning on telling how to disarm it in the first place and was just trying to buy more time so there would be no possible way to save…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture is ineffective in achieving world safety and obtaining valid information. First, there are more effective tactics to get information rather than torture. Second, the obtained confessions may involve false statement in order to stop the torture. ‘Experience indicates that the use of force is not necessary to gain the cooperation of sources for interrogation. Therefore, the use of force is a poor technique, as it yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear.’…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Against Torture

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The debate regarding the ethical acceptance of torturing a person in the War on Terrorism is a difficult decision/stance to take. It fluctuates throughout our society. Even those who have strong spirituals belief may sway when it comes to making the final choice of to torture or not to torture. My opinion is that if you commit the crime you must accept the punishment; but torture.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the there the right people to administer the torture to get the information in place? How much time before said bomb goes off would be needed to justify torture? A year? A month? The logic behind the scenario also could allow any morally unjustifiable action, for example, commit X(murder, genocide, rape) to save multiple lives.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I do believe in Utilitarianism and with this system the best would have been to kill the terrorists at the moment because it benefited the people. However, my situational ethics would have interfered with my thinking and I would have applied ethics of care. This is because I consider killing a child is wrong. Although I do believe in completing the mission and be successful about it, I do not think everything should be done on my hands to complete a mission. Other options came up as the mission was being completed but it was in the best interest to analyze all of them.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays