Is It Acceptable To Break The Law Essay

Improved Essays
Is it acceptable to break the law under certain circumstances? Law is defined as; the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties. It should be acceptable to bend the law if it is used for good intentions. Laws are meant to keep people safe, but under certain conditions they are over controlling, and they need to be broken. It can be beneficial or even life saving at times to break the law, but it is not acceptable to break the law at all times. There are exceptions to the law, and they need to be recognized when the time is right. Imagine if a government started to kill its own people in an uncontrollable and psychotic manner. This would be a time where the people would have to rebel, or fight back, against the governing body in control. The law would be broken because attacks to this scale would be illegal, but it is all in an effort to save harmless civilians being murdered by an irrational higher power. If the innocent people do not break the law and fight back, then more innocent people die and it creates a more unsafe environment. The law needs to be …show more content…
These people believe that the law is too threatening to find any loophole for the greater safety of people. However, these people do not see that there are justifications to the law in some cases that are positive and are for the good/safety of people. For example, driving over the speed limit, or recklessly, to rush someone in critical condition to the hospital would be a time when justifying the law would be acceptable with the intention of saving a life. The driving illegally for someone’s safety would also be acceptable if a woman is in labor and needs to get to the hospital as quickly as possible before she gives birth. This is why the law is acceptable to bend at specific times for the safety of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights. Burns thinks that by killing the person we have alleviate the anger, and have rid the world of that wicked person. We have somehow, gained retribution for the act they have committed, and shown others that we do not allow this act. But, I believe by allowing the courts to legally kill we are promoting the act of killing. We are saying it is OK, to kill someone if they have killed someone you love.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many arguments that the death penalty is wrong because it is putting the lives of the innocent or wrongly accused at risk and that it is morally wrong. However, there are also many other reasons to still use it today because it could be used as a deterrent for further crimes from happening and it will prevent people from reoffending. It is the only effective way to deter crimes, and the Federal Government of the United States has regulated the use of the death penalty in the past but now it is up to the individual states of America or countries across the world to decide if they want to use it again to prevent future crimes from happening. In the future, it should be mandatory throughout entire…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simulating Murder Summary

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans want to be quilt free which requires them to pin the blame on other for their actions. Murder is a huge crime, which goes to show that it’s hard to justify such action even if done for the sake of another. Free will goes into play in all this, which explains the classic scenario where one is made to kill someone unless they want to be killed or someone else gets killed. When stripped of their free will, people find it morally ok to perform actions of harm when otherwise they wouldn’t. Morality is a big factor but also can become an instigator to produce this…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the murderer’s family would most likely be affected negatively by the death, the vast majority of people would be safe. If the law took a chance and allowed the murderer to live unpunished and that person killed again, that blood, along with the blood of the first victim, would be on the hands of the law. This is because they did ignored their duty to protect people and prevent this from happening…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man. (Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay!…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the government tried to take away guns completely there would be absolute chaos. The United States has grown with guns by its side the whole way, which isn't a bad thing. Since guns are a known machinery, taking them away causes more upset than helpfulness. “It has even been suggested that,“gun free zones” actually attract killers who know they will meet only helpless victims rather than anyone able to effectively oppose them” (Gun Free Zones). Taking away these weapons as a whole will still ultimately hurt the people.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But when people argue that they are simply not looking out for the better of others. There are many ways to keep the speed limits from being an ¨ Inconvenience¨. Have a schedule and stick by it so that you don't have the urge to speed. Laws are made not to bother people but to keep everyone as safe as possible. Think of how awful it would be for a driver that was speeding to make a mistake and hit someone because they couldn't stop in time and think of how much worse it would be for the victims family.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason is because this law, among may others, are not being enforced. People can break minor laws with no consequences, so they begin to think it is acceptable to do so. Another reason is because people are becoming more and more carless. They are beginning to think that laws to protect others don’t matter, if it doesn’t effect them. The combination of these two things result in more people breaking minor laws; which in some people’s eyes is wrong, because breaking minor laws only leads to more chaos in the future— for if people can break minor laws with no consequences, surely breaking major laws, such as grand theft, is…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    You can’t punish someone based on what they did; Subjectivism will give anyone on this planet a chance to avoid the death penalty. How you might ask, to someone murder might be the biggest sin in the world, but in this system that’s not a moral fact. It’s just how you feel and your opinion towards the objective but again there is no moral objective fact towards your statement. A view like this is what we need, other people can justify that a murderer doesn’t deserve the death penalty. People will open their minds more broadly and look at the person as a human being.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some laws are just so unacceptable that is not only the people’s right, but duty to disobey them. Following the laws that govern us blindly is a dangerous way to live. It is acceptable to go against the government when the government threatens lives of innocents and restricts free will, when the government loses the best interest of those it governs, and when the government neglects to acknowledge the voices of the people. It can only be expected that people…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays