Jean Jacques Rousseau Legitimate Government

Improved Essays
Many well known philosophers have their own belief about legitimate governments. Jean Jacques Rousseau, a well know philosopher strongly believes that a legitimate government consists of general will. According to Rousseau every “man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” By chains, Rousseau is referring to the social restrain caused by illegitimate and inadequate governments. These words are evident in “On the Social Contract” where Rousseau expresses concern towards the government and whether it is legitimate or the man of society in reality is held captive by his government. Rousseau considers a legitimate government to be one that “defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and, by means …show more content…
The general will benefits everyone in society and takes the publics view into consideration. Voting in the government and assembly of people is a criterion of the general will. It requires you to perform a duty in public affairs and a true government can only exist if all of its members contribute. Rousseau believes that the government should have minimal power, while the members of society influence what occurs. The general will “is always constant, unalterable, and pure: but it is subordinate to other wills that prevail over it.” Since a monarchy is based on the private interest of the ruler, it may be difficult to identify the general will in that society. In a society, Rousseau believes that every man is obligated to vote and voice his opinion, which falls under the general will category. There are two types of wills, the general and the private will. Under the general will, people vote in a deliberative democracy and members of the society vote for what they believe is beneficial for the general will and public. This procedure permits everyone being treated fairly in society but the method is fallible because of the natural greed of human beings. Under the private will, members vote in a private democracy and vote for what they believe is best for them. This procedure is infallible and is the only way to satisfy everyone …show more content…
All the members of the community are expected to gather in the assembly of the people and vote on behalf of the general will. When a law is proposed in the assembly, the public is asked whether they agree with the proposition and whether it conforms the general will, then they vote and voice their opinion. The difference of a single vote breaks a tie vote in the assembly and a single opponent destroys a unanimous vote. The vote of the majority prevails and obligates all

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In addition, Jean-Jaques Rousseau thought that everyone should give their freedom to society. In document 3, Rousseau says that every person “gives their freedom to the general will, but they also become part of the general will and have the same power as everyone else”. He wanted equality and argued for a direct democracy, which is very similar to how we do things today. He believed people are born good, but are corrupted by power, so power should be distributed evenly so chaos does not occur.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ABSTRACT Explorations of philosophical ideas on the most suitable and ideal state has been variously conceived in contemporary political thoughts. The general will, having its origins in theological debates, ultimately became one of the most celebrated and denigrated concepts emerging from early modern political thought. For which Jean-Jacques Rousseau made it the central element of his political theory; for it means a “will that must come from all and apply to all” (Social Contract, 15) The General Will became a normative concept which Rousseau used as a means of reconciling individual freedom and collective responsibility. The main line of argument of this study develops on the utopian nature of the concept of the general will in Rousseau’s…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wrote about how every man should be of the society and he has his own will; this is shown in our society with the way we are able to politically participate in the government. “In reality, each individual may have one particular will as a man that is different from-or contrary to-the general will which he has as a citizen.”- Rousseau. This statement supports that men will chose presidents whose policy will align with their will/opinions so that he can try to make his life more suitable. We have seen many examples of this happening today such as Florida is neither a republican nor democratic state yet is swayed every year.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau believed that the sovereignty of the state belonged to its citizens and that it was…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau incorportates in his work, The Social Contract, that “[government] is an intermediary body established between the subjects and the sovereign to keep them in touch with each other. It is charged with executing the laws and maintaining both civil and political liberty.... The only will dominating government ... should be the general will or the law… As soon as [government] attempts to let any act come from itself completely independently, it starts to lose its intermediary role.” This quote can be described as that the government is the conversation between the people and ruler and with a purpose of preserving the freedom of the people.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Toussaint L Ouverture

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    AN INTRODUCTION The general will of a society exists as a collection (though not as simply as a sum of its parts) of the wishes and opinions of the members of said society. In The Social Contract, Rousseau asserts the general will is the most important aspect of a functional society; it is imperative the leader is subservient to the general will, lest the people not be properly represented. When the general will is not allowed to act (as the Sovereign) through legislative means (i.e. the leader does not take the general will into account), then the society is doomed to be destroyed.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke believed people needed to form a government in order to protect their property. As stated in The Second Treatise of Government, “The great and chief end, therefore, of men’s uniting into commonwealths and putting themselves under government is the preservation of property…” (Locke, 37). Under the rule of the king, the natural rights people had to property (life, liberty, and estates) were taken, however, Locke believed that by joining or creating a representative government, their natural rights would be preserved. In contrast, Rousseau believed that the purpose of a direct government was to bring harmony and unite the people under the general will.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke’s Second Treatise of Government allowed for the ideal that no ruler or government could do whatever they pleased because there were moral laws that encompassed all of society. However, Rousseau was adamant in his belief that man “is born free and everywhere he is in chains. ”1 Rousseau defended the right of the people to rule, he argued that the people were only accountable for themselves and the ruler or government had no right to subjugate the people. Locke and Rousseau’s idea of government are similar in the fact that they both embody some aspects of our government today. Rousseau inspired the phrase “We the people…”2 at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence because of his belief in the wisdom of the people to decide in their own affairs.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau observes human nature as innately good when it’s extracted from all social attachments and the immensely corrupting overall influence of society itself. Society, for Rousseau in his eyes is a grand impulse where the decencies of human beings are displayed. Rousseau 's political theories are derived from the seemingly simple idea of arranging humans into a social setting that’s bare of corrupting elements of society. Rousseau 's leap toward a social and political order of amour propre over amour de soi is evidence of this. Rousseau derives a substantial amount of his beliefs from morals such as equality.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ‘general will’ would now govern the states, taking away one’s natural rights, but gaining them civil liberties. According to Rousseau, the ‘general will’ was when man gave power to the majority and essentially hoped that they would govern correctly. By following the guidelines set out than one would essentially be governing themselves because the guidelines of society are set up with consideration for the ‘general will’. Rousseau valued the idea of people’s sovereignty and for him the state, ‘general will’, laws, and guidelines were…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau stood firm in his belief of what the right form of government would look like or at least appear to be, but also argues that people are surrendering rights and freedom to themselves while establishing a civil society. In the reading A World of Ideas; Jean-Jacques Rousseau “The Origin of Civil Society” by Lee Jacobus, they briefly describe what kind of arguments and challenges he had faced from opposing famous philosophers ' beliefs. Some of which including those who played a role in aiding the development of the type of government seen in America today. In the book Jacobus…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, this seems to be a critique of the law of nature, where the strongest are the ones fit to survive, which would follow Natural Law, but not the rules of the Social Contract. Obeying because one is forced to due to the “might” of a ruler is not the same as one obeying because of their moral obligation. Furthermore, he rejects the notion of “might makes right” for the reasoning that God chose the “mighty” to rule and therefore the ruler should be obeyed, as God is the source of the Natural Law, and that goes against the notions of the Social Contract. Natural Law is a point of contention for Rousseau, as he seems to change his opinion of believing it or not depending on which idea will better support his argument. However, he does establish that there was definitely something present for us in our state of nature that we found an equal in with the Social…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Social Contract Rousseau speaks of the ideal government; this ideal government would be like the aristocracy, that the wisest are those who should be in power. Because in this way, the society is not going to be full of vices and selfishness where the strongest, is the one who has the power over the weak. Since democracy is utopic, because in this political system, all citizens should be governing and that is not possible; in addition to that, in a society sadly not everyone is prepared to be govern or to elect a president. Specifically in the case of United Stated and many democracies around the world have a democratic system full of vices because under my point of view, most of those who are in power are not prepared; as they get there,…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays