Is Euthanasia And Murder?

Improved Essays
Is Euthanasia Murder?
Many people believe that euthanasia is the same as murder because in both scenarios an individual is passing away. However, euthanasia and murder, although similar in some ways, are two different concepts. The intentions behind murder and euthanasia are key in differentiating the two and as a result many do not see them as the same. The intention behind murder is not the victim’s good. In addition, the victim does not consent to murder. However, the intention behind euthanasia is for the patient’s own good and the patient is the one who chooses death over living. Murder is to kill someone against his or her will because of hate, anger toward the victim or because the death of the victim is beneficial for personal reasons.
…show more content…
The intention behind euthanasia is the patient’s own good. There are many patients who die after suffering for a long time from an illness which modern science has no cure for. These patients do not feel like any other human being, as they have lost something that made them a whole as a human. They have lost the whole of their humanity and their dignity. These patients are in intolerable amounts of pain, of which there is no cure for. In these conditions, some patients choose death over suffering for the rest of their life, which puts them at peace. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek language, which means good death. Most of the people wish to die painlessly and in peace which is considered a good death. However, patients who are terminally ill and/or in an intolerable pain are not the ones who are going to experience a good death and this takes away their dignity and wholeness as humans. Therefore, euthanasia could be a way to make them feel whole again and give their dignity back. Additionally, the patient rationally decides whether he or she wants to die or not, which everyone should respect, because it is his or her body and property, and every person has the freedom of choice. The morality of the euthanasia depends on the person’s belief system. Those who find it immoral, probably would not consent to euthanasia and those who believe it moral probably would. For instance killing cows in India is immoral because cows are …show more content…
This is not true for a couple reasons. First, the life span of terminally ill people and/or people in an intolerable amount of pain is short, thus the patient might die in agony and pain before any medical discoveries occur. Second, if the cure is found, it takes years for it to pass the animal trial stage, and after that it will take years to pass the human trial stage and then become available to public. This process is so long that many patients die in the process. Third, when a doctor preforms euthanasia on a patient, the doctor takes consent from the patient, and tries to help the patient. Many people take their time, do their bucket list, say goodbye to love ones and die with dignity and peace with their loved ones around

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    EUTHANASIA – AN ETHICAL DILEMMA IN PALLIATIVE CARE The origin of the word euthanasia comes from the Greek word euthanatos – eu meaning good or pleasant and thanatos meaning death, more so when someone has control over their death, how they die and where they are when that happens. Unfortunately, as illness and suffering takes over health and wellbeing, this becomes nearly impossible for many, resulting in the question of a person ’s right to an assisted death to relieve pain and suffering (Starr 2014). Currently, Euthanasia remains illegal and a complex social issue in Australia which continues to be debated by the community (Byrne 2013).…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This begs the question, “is it right to kill another to deliver them from their misery”. . Medically, euthanasia is the right choice and depicted as an act of grace. Ethically, it’s wrong and seen as a nefarious exercise. Euthanasia is seen as a way to ease the pain, but it doesn't change the fact its murder. This practice is improper and considered a stain on modern medical science.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One pro to this is that it ends the suffering that the patient is currently enduring. Terminal illnesses are known to cause a steep amount of physical pain as the patient nears death. The amount of pain can cause the patient to acquire fear as the patient knows that death is just around the corner. Euthanasia is able to cut the suffering of the patient short, as well as the pain that the patient’s friends and family feel when watching the patient suffer. It allows all involved to retain dignity.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Claire Conroy, a woman suffering from end stages of dementia, robbed of her right to choose voluntary euthanasia. She had other health issues including heart disease, high blood pressure, gangrene in her leg, bedsores, and was unable to talk. She could not control her bladder or bowels, and was only able to moan, scratch, and sometime smile if someone was combing her hair. Claire had not gotten to exercise her right to die. She died a slow and painful death, suffering from infection and dementia.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Euthanasia Wrong

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another way to explain euthanasia in an ethical form would be to take a personal stand on the matter. I personally feel that euthanasia is not morally right. Even though utilitarianism says it’s good other theories and philosophers have greatly disagreed. In particular Samuel von Pufenforf believed in the duty theory. The duty theory states that “we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles and rules regardless of outcome.”…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is when you kill someone out of mercy or to stop them from suffering. In Australia it is currently illegal to kill someone out of mercy. But euthanasia should be legalised. People are living their lives with unbearable pain, they have the right to die peacefully and painlessly. It is a person’s choice if they want to suffer or not it is not immoral to end someone’s pain.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Assisted Suicide Ethical? Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Euthanasia, when this does occur can either happen voluntary or involuntary. This means that some patients know and the others do not know. This happens all around the world today. Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide is not only morally wrong, but is very dangerous. Just because a person cannot deal with their everyday lives or problems does not mean that they should kill themselves.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of a physician or other third party ending a patient 's life in response to severe, persistent and untreatable pain and suffering ( Morrow, 2016). Throughout the world we live in today this is a very touchy subject and has brought about a number of moral dilemmas, such as that people have a right to self-determination, and should definitely have the right to decide their own fate, or helping an individual with the knowing and accepting of their death is better than allowing them to continuously suffer. The main question surrounding this hot controversy is whether this process is ethical or not; should human beings have the right to decide on issues of life and death? When further looking into the different types…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the late 1930s, euthanasia has been a very sore subject both for the courts and American society. The question of whether people who suffer from terminal illnesses should end their life early sticks in the mind of doctors and psychologists alike. In my opinion, voluntary active euthanasia is morally wrong and is nothing more than voluntary homicide. However, when the person who suffers from the terminal illness is no longer able to make decisions for themselves, and they no longer possess the ability to carry out necessary bodily functions without assistance, the freedom to choose is left up to either the doctor, or the caretaker of that person.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it true that people think it’s not morally right to kill a person, but that it’s morally acceptable to let them die? James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if passive euthanasia is permissible, then active euthanasia should also be. In medical ethics, the distinction between both euthanasias are highly controversial, yet passive euthanasia is accepted and practiced by a majority of doctors. Despite critical conditions to one’s medical case, the majority of people believe active killing is morally worse than letting one die.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnny was alone by himself in his cold dark room. His hands were clammy and he felt miserable. “I can't believe i’m doing this” moped Johnny. He put the gun to his temple and pulled the trigger. Johnny had a terminal illness, and because the right to die is not legal, he was forced to take his own life.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word euthanasia derives from greek origins that translates to ‘good death’. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. The controversy surrounding euthanasia stems from whether an individual with a disability is able to make the choice to put an end to their life. It is difficult to establish whether the individual has a rational state of mind. Philosophical theories of morality and rationality can be applied to an individual’s right to death with dignity.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benefits Of Euthanasia

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Euthanasia should be a choice of the patients, so if the patient feels it goes against their religious beliefs they would not have to choose to go through with euthanasia. Although there are a few cons regarding euthanasia, families and the patients should be able to choose if they can stop the unbearable pain and…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as death with honor or dignity is used to help patients who are suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. When doctors see no hope of cure in a patient’s health, the treatment becomes too painful euthanasia helps, in euthanasia doctors can drug the patient suffering with lethal and put them to sleep.. It is every human’s natural right to decide whether they wish to live or die, especially in the situation where there is no hope for cure. Legalizing Euthanasia can put an end to miserable sufferings of patients in need. It is a way to reduce further treatments that do not guarantee cure and rather cause more pain to the patient.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics