DDT could save the one million people that die from the deadly disease malaria per year. DDT was an insecticide developed in the 1940s. It was initially used with great effect to combat malaria and other insect-borne diseases. It also was effective for insect control in crops, homes, and gardens. After news that the insecticide was perilous in 1962, the United States prohibited the use of it in 1972, as well did numerous countries. The use of DDT is advantageous to people because it prevented Malaria and was a low-costing insecticide, but it might cause cancers. DDT prevented the transmission of the deadly disease malaria. It was a non-harmful insecticide, that was regularly utilized during World War Two. It was used
…show more content…
It fought against malaria which could have saved the US numerous dollars that were wasted on less viable preventions for the sickness. The article, “ DDT for Indoor Residual Spraying in the US” states, “It costs only $1.44 per year to spray one house with DDT. The more toxic substitutes cost as much as 10 to 20 times more and require more frequent applications, making spraying programs prohibitively expensive.” DDT was cheap, non-lethal, and was effective. The insecticide was 10 to 20 times less expensive than most insecticide utilized. Utilizing it there were fewer needs for frequent applications. “...2010 annual economic losses from malaria exceeded the US $69 billion {.....} However, this economic loss can be reduced to the US $5 billion if the use of DDT is restricted to only areas with the highest malaria endemicity.” If the insecticide was authorized accurately the US economy could have spared $64 billion. In the event that the insecticide is used incorrect measurements, it is more productive. “Cost-comparison of DDT and alternative insecticides for malaria control” explains, “A 1990 cost comparison by the World Health Organization (WHO) found DDT to be considerably less expensive than other insecticides, which cost 2 to 23 times more on the basis of cost per house per 6 months of control.” DDT was around eleven times less expensive than most insecticide utilized. Individuals got a less expensive …show more content…
It was utilized a lot between the years of 1940 and 1970. In 1953 the US chose to drop billions of pounds of the insecticide all over. After that Rachel Carson composed Silent Spring which discussed the numerous threats of DDT. One of the numerous risks Rachel Carson explained, was it caused cancers. As evidenced by “DDT Linked to Fourfold Increase in Breast Cancer Risk,” “In addition, daughters exposed to the higher levels of DDT were more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive tumors and advanced stages of the disease, according to the study.” The evidence suggests that the insecticide is a harmful and cancer producing. People who are exposed to high levels of it have higher chances of being diagnosed with cancer. “Study Ties DDT to Cancer Cases,” says, “Women with the highest exposure to the pesticide DDT had four times the breast cancer risk of women with the least exposure, a study showed yesterday.” When people are uncovered to a generous amount of DDT their chances of cancer is likely, compared to people who are exposed to low levels of the chemical. A common argument against insecticide is it causes cancerous growths, but the insecticide does not create cancers or have cancer creating substances. “Study Finds No Link Between Cancer Risk And DDT Exposure” a New York Times article states, “In the next 10 years, 209 died, including 54 who died of cancer. The data
It fought against malaria which could have saved the US numerous dollars that were wasted on less viable preventions for the sickness. The article, “ DDT for Indoor Residual Spraying in the US” states, “It costs only $1.44 per year to spray one house with DDT. The more toxic substitutes cost as much as 10 to 20 times more and require more frequent applications, making spraying programs prohibitively expensive.” DDT was cheap, non-lethal, and was effective. The insecticide was 10 to 20 times less expensive than most insecticide utilized. Utilizing it there were fewer needs for frequent applications. “...2010 annual economic losses from malaria exceeded the US $69 billion {.....} However, this economic loss can be reduced to the US $5 billion if the use of DDT is restricted to only areas with the highest malaria endemicity.” If the insecticide was authorized accurately the US economy could have spared $64 billion. In the event that the insecticide is used incorrect measurements, it is more productive. “Cost-comparison of DDT and alternative insecticides for malaria control” explains, “A 1990 cost comparison by the World Health Organization (WHO) found DDT to be considerably less expensive than other insecticides, which cost 2 to 23 times more on the basis of cost per house per 6 months of control.” DDT was around eleven times less expensive than most insecticide utilized. Individuals got a less expensive …show more content…
It was utilized a lot between the years of 1940 and 1970. In 1953 the US chose to drop billions of pounds of the insecticide all over. After that Rachel Carson composed Silent Spring which discussed the numerous threats of DDT. One of the numerous risks Rachel Carson explained, was it caused cancers. As evidenced by “DDT Linked to Fourfold Increase in Breast Cancer Risk,” “In addition, daughters exposed to the higher levels of DDT were more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive tumors and advanced stages of the disease, according to the study.” The evidence suggests that the insecticide is a harmful and cancer producing. People who are exposed to high levels of it have higher chances of being diagnosed with cancer. “Study Ties DDT to Cancer Cases,” says, “Women with the highest exposure to the pesticide DDT had four times the breast cancer risk of women with the least exposure, a study showed yesterday.” When people are uncovered to a generous amount of DDT their chances of cancer is likely, compared to people who are exposed to low levels of the chemical. A common argument against insecticide is it causes cancerous growths, but the insecticide does not create cancers or have cancer creating substances. “Study Finds No Link Between Cancer Risk And DDT Exposure” a New York Times article states, “In the next 10 years, 209 died, including 54 who died of cancer. The data