Is Cloning Beneficial Or Beneficial? Essays

1096 Words Dec 11th, 2015 5 Pages
In 1997, the first adult mammal was successfully cloned, a sheep named Dolly. This event led to the speculations of human cloning, reviving of extinct or endangered animals, and a medical innovation, which have become sizable controversial topics. In reality, the whole issue is arcane. The act of cloning is a very beneficial instrument to humans, as long as it is applied appropriately.
A full knowledge of cloning is a requisite to understand the issue. Cloning is the biological process of producing genetically identical organisms. Clones are organisms that are exact genetic copies. Every single bit of their DNA is identical. Clones can happen naturally—identical twins, or they can be made in the lab (“What is Cloning”). The difference between natural fertilization and cloning lies in the chromosomes. In natural fertilization, the sperm and the egg each have one set of chromosomes. When they combine, it creates an embryo with 46 total chromosomes. 23 from the sperm of the father and the other 23 from the egg of the mother. In the process of cloning, a complete set of 46 chromosomes is extracted from a cell of the organism of which one would like to clone. The full set of chromosomes replaces the half set in the egg cell of the surrogate.
The idea of cloning has developed many controversies such as cloning is playing God, immoral or unethical, unnatural, and less diversity. Playing God is possibly the largest debate involving cloning. People believe human beings should only…

Related Documents