Is Capital Punishment Immoral? Essay

1555 Words Oct 31st, 2016 7 Pages
Is Capital Punishment Immoral
In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder, that individual renders their rights and should acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various arguments against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness, but I disagree with Reiman proposal to no longer use capital punishment.
Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes, and is used for extreme heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny before the death penalty is executed. Consequently, Reiman conveys a different notion that any violation of moral duties should be dealt with in the same manner to the offender. If a victim was raped, then the offender should be raped as well. Although this type of thinking is not entirely incorrect, in a Kantian world, it would have been proportionate and does not penalized with the exact same crime. Thus, if a victim was raped, then the offender would have to undergo a punishment that would suffice for the crime committed. The rapper could be punished by being sentenced to a reasonable time in incarceration. Therefore, the process of punishment does not have to fit what actions the violator performed on the victim. The rape scenario would be an extreme circumstance of criminal acts, but if the scenario was changed to another…

Related Documents