Is Animal Testing Justified

Amazing Essays
Is animal testing morally justified?

In the era of science and technology, human has an ever-increasing living standard . As such, numerous products have been created to meet our constantly generating demands in different aspect of lives. In order to examine the quality of the products, animal testing are widely applied in multiple industries, and it seems that animal testing is inevitable for the sake of human.

In definition, “animal testing” refers to the procedures which performed on living animals for various purposes of testing the human health and/or environmental safety of new products, assessing the effects of new products, and scientific research into biology and diseases. According to the Humane Society International, animals that
…show more content…
I will attempt to argue on the basis of subject-of-life view and virtue ethics, and prove that animal testing is morally unjustified and should be stopped as soon as possible for the sake of …show more content…
Tom Regan has proposed the subject-of-life view in which animals have a basic moral right to be treated with respect. This view aims defending the issue of ‘animals rights’ and opposing any kind of animal experimentation. As animals are enjoying their basic rights, it is logical that they should not be treated with enforced feeding, inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, so on so forth. People may argue that animals have rights but not equal rights as human, so that animals should be chosen first in tests. However, animals do have the right to be respected in disregard of the fact that animals may not necessarily enjoy the same right as human. So it is immoral to allow animals to be utilized as mere means in animal experimentation. According to Regan, the only explainable reason for an individual to undergo painful experiments would be to benefit these very same individual, or through their own will. For example, this would justify performing therapeutic procedures in animals, as well as in children and people with disabilities that cannot express their consent. So experimentation aiming in testifying products is in no way

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Deontology thus provides a more compelling argument against animal research than utilitarianism. A major proponent of this outlook is Tom Regan, who has written on the subject in The Case for Animal Rights, in which he bases his argument against animal research on the sentience of animals and consequently their right to be respected as individuals. Regan argues that “if individuals have equal inherent value…we are to treat those individuals…in ways that respect their inherent value” (248). Exploiting animals for scientific knowledge therefore infringes upon their rights in that it disrespects their inherent value. One of deontology’s key principles is to treat individuals as ends rather than means.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals. (Judson 10). A lot of people agree that the leading con of animal testing is how the animals are treated.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For the safety of humans, these tests consist of drug exposure, and plasma concentration (Guidance for Industry 1). Animal testing is useful because the animals test the drugs and make sure it is safe for human use. The next article “Safety and Testing” talks about the different kinds of clinical trials used for drug testing. New chemical or drugs still have to be tested and is required by law. Tests begin with the acute toxicity test and it is used for the exploratory development of a brand new drug.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people aren’t willing to acknowledge that animals feel pain and suffer too. Animal welfare was set up to protect animals from any physical harm done by humans such as abuse, experiments, etc. Unlike, animals rights activist, animal welfare activist sometimes support animal testing as long as the animal is cared for, fed, and treated well. On the other hand, rights activist…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal rights is an idea that non-human animals should be entitled to their own lives, and that they should be afforded similar consideration as human. I will argue that it is a better option for humans not to accept animal rights, and I will offer three reasons to support this claim. Firstly, Animal rights is limiting to the advancement in human health. Secondly, there are alternatives to accepting the Animal rights. Finally, Animal rights does not support animal control, which is important for sustaining ecosystems and the environment.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Necessary

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many reasons that people believe animal testing is a necessity in modern research. Animal’s biology is very similar to humans, which is why we can use animals for human research. Animals are fundamental to biological and medical research. By researching and experimenting on them, we can learn more about different tissues and organs and how to maintain their health. Animal models help develop new treatments for diseases.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animals do have rights to a certain extent. Animals have the right not be mistreated and used by humans. Indirect duty means that we don’t have direct duties to animals, but we do have duties about animals. So torturing an animal is wrong because it harms the animal not because it upsets other humans. Direct duty means that we have a direct duty to not be harmful, but kind to animals.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, animals do not think so they can harm an individual anytime. These notions intensify the debate about animal ethics. Animals do not speak and communicate emotions, but they deserve to be treated well since they are living things. Human beings who do not believe in animal ethics should look at the brighter side since animals such as dogs make other human beings…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays