Animal Testing Inhumane Essay

Improved Essays
Payton Keife
Nick DiMeo
English 101
11 November 2017
Is Animal Experimentation Inhumane? Animal experimentation is known and used worldwide; from testing beauty products to medication, thousands of animals are harmed daily by fumes and chemicals, leaving them traumatized. There are many other solutions determining if products are harmful or not, yet, they are rarely used. The use of animals during testing, should most likely be banned and throughout the world, because it has been proven to be less accurate and more harmful. Although animal testing is thought to be “life-saving”, it has also been categorized as inhumane and cruel. Approximately 50% of animals used in testing are killed, due to the intensity of the products. The animals
…show more content…
Due to the amount of differences between humans and animals, it greatly affects the results of direct animal testing. If ever using the In-Vitro approach, the results are potentially as accurate as they can be, resulting in a less painful, yet more beneficial product. While animal testing may be considered life-saving in some circumstances, it is, then again, not nearly as accurate as of the other methods available. In-Vitro testing, which takes place in a Petri dish, is much more precise, as human cells are used in this process, instead of an animal. In the 1950, the narcotic, thalidomide, was found to be unsafe after the medication is tested on animals. Although this drug was tested on animals, there were reported the deformities in over 10,000 newborn babies. In later research, it was found that the drug Vivoxx caused nearly 27,000 cardiac related deaths before being forever banned from the market. This drug was initially tested on mice and seemed to have been protected, yet was unhelpful towards humans (“Animal Testing”- ProCon). It is imperative to decrease the inaccuracy during animal testing; therefore In-Vitro seems to be the most effective explanation. As companies begin to release new products, they must be tested somehow. Animal testing is still a very popular form of testing, even if it can be avoided. As animal testing continues to take place across many countries, many begin to wonder what is so great about it and why it has not yet been banned. Animal experimentation does have its perks, nonetheless and researchers have, certainly, found that animals do help

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Testing on animals is an ongoing debate among people due to the reasoning, pros and cons, and the alternative choices available. There are many reasons that people test on animals. “Animal experimentation became the primary method of learning about anatomy, physiology, and disease processes.” (13). Using animals for…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bailey, Matthew R. “It's Time to End Ineffective And Cruel Animal Testing.” Wall Street Journal, 09 Oct 2017, PP. 16A. Matthew R. Bailey, in his newspaper article “It's Time to End Ineffective And Cruel Animal Testing” (2017), the author argues that testing drugs on animals is ineffective and claims animal lovers favor research that saves animals lives instead of killing them. In order for Bailey to get his point across, he states “Testing drugs on animals is notoriously ineffective. Not only do laboratory animals suffer from confinement and research procedures, but because they present different biologies and physiologies, different species (and even breeds within a species) respond differently to various substances.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On average, about 26 million animals are taken and used as little test subjects for big corporations to test their possibly harmful, and occasionally lethal, products before they release them to the public's use. This testing on animals began in 500 B.C and many corporations that participate in it see no harm, and have absolutely no intentions of stopping it anytime soon. There are many people that think testing these possibly dangerous products on innocent animals is not a big deal, but this paper will inform the public with some statistics and also give you the writer's perspective on why animal testing is wrong. One thing that is very arguable when talking about whether testing on these creatures should be approved, and continue or…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is the use of animals for experimentation to determine the efficiency of drugs. Animal testing has resulted in numerous amounts of medical breakthroughs in science. Animal testing has saved millions of human’s lives around the world, but killed just as many animals’ lives as well. Many animals…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is unsafe, due to the obvious differences between humans and animals. Therefore, results from animal testing can be inaccurate, or can yield results that differ between animals and humans. For example, a drug used in cosmetics called Fen Phen has no effect on animals, but causes heart damage to humans (“Animals in Science”). Since animal testing is an ineffective way of testing chemicals or drugs, it could potentially put many people at risk (“Animal Experimentation”). Nevertheless, humans are being harmed from dangerous and unreliable tests, while animals are dying without cause since these tests are unsuccessful.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monsters We Created - Animal Testing Universally, animal testing has a famous reputation known for things like medicinal production and (mainly) cosmetic purposes; however, while these experiments may make humans look more beautiful and attractive, the animals’ treatment in these experiments looks horribly ugly in comparison. People have disputed the controversy of animal testing for many years, mainly questioning the morals of animal experimentation or trying to justify it. For the most part, advancing into animal testing has shown itself as a great mistake for humanity and continues to cause unnecessary animal suffering.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is among one of the most controversial issues worldwide. Animal testing can lead to many great discoveries in our constant evolving world, but can also endanger the lives of innocent creatures. Through many arguments, animal testing puts the life of animals at risk in order to try to make advancements in the medical, cosmetic, and scientific fields. The first animal testing began in the 17th century on numerous animals to demonstrate blood circulation. Animal testing expanded quickly and in 1876 parliament passed the Cruelty to Animal Acts in Europe.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cassidy Walton Professor Marek English 1101 Sec. 54AZ 6 June 2018 Annotated Bibliography: Animal Testing Animal testing is one of the most frowned upon scientific experiments around, but the whole world needs this testing to save the human race. There are causes and effects just like any other scientific experiments. The testing of animals helps the human race better understand the way animals react to the cures, and to help find cures for the diseases.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although animal experimentation has provided many benefits, there are alternatives to test toxic substances that may eliminate the cruel use of animals in research. The United States, along with many other countries, have turned to the use of animals in research labs to test human products for hazardous substances. According to the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, the United States uses about 12 million animals every year making it the biggest conductor of animal experimentation in the world. Scientists and many companies believe that testing their products on animals save humans from being harmed if the product is toxic. However, no matter what the benefits of animal experimentation are, the tests conducted on the animals are cruel.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goldberg, the author explores animal testing from a slightly different perspective. Goldberg acknowledges that sometimes animal testing can be beneficial, but he also goes into detail about other ways in which the same testing can be done with little or no use of whole living animals. The process of in vitro can be utilized in order to study different drugs on individual colonies of cells as opposed to whole organisms (Goldberg). This is really important in backing up the argument that animals should not be used as test subjects, especially if there is a way around…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Though I concede that in some situations, animal testing may be useful, such as in immensely important medical studies, I still maintain that it is unnecessary to make an animal suffer and be discriminated against. Although some people may think that animal testing is healthy and beneficial to humans, I believe that animal testing is unethical and utterly wrong because of the unfair repulsive treatment that animals receive from scientists. This topic is important because the world we live in is as much an animal 's world as it is a human’s world and right now humans are discriminating and enslaving…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Introduction: An estimated twenty six million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals make poor test subjects, and animals’ rights are violated. I. Animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays