Is Alexander The Great A Good Leader?

Improved Essays
Many people have many different opinions on different people. One person that fits under this category is Alexander the Great. Some people think that he was not a good ruler and others believe that Alexander the Great was a great leader. Based on the documents, Alexander the Great was a great leader because he is prepared, genuine, and was fair to his people. To start, Alexander the Great was known to be prepared. If something ever changed, he knew what to do. For example, in The Campaigns of Alexander, Alexander the Great had a problem. He identified the problem and solved it. The problem was, “He realized that he could not cross at the point where Porus was encamped - his elephants were too numerous… When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled…” (Arrianus 1). Alexander the Great knew that Porus was encamped at a certain point and came up with a different plan. He thought to spread out his troops in all different directions to puzzle Porus. This is showing good leadership because Alexander the Great was able to completely change his plan and still become successful. All in all, Alexander the Great is prepared and a great leader. Next, Alexander the Great was genuine when dealing with a potential …show more content…
For instance, “Alexander, like everyone else, was tormented by thirst, but he was nonetheless marching on foot at the head of his men. It was all he could do to keep going, but he did so, and the result (as always) was that the men were the better able to endure their misery when they saw that it was equally shared” (Arrianus 1). This quote is saying that Alexander the Great suffered with is men and led them through thick and thin. When all of his men were suffering, Alexander the Great was there, leading them, suffered the same amount as everyone else. This is showing that he is extremely fair to his men, suffering with

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As he traveled, he fought in many battles with 5 major battles. He was almost always successful. So, the big question is how great is Alexander The Great?Alexander was great for these reasons; his concern for others, lasting legacy and his remarkable achievements. Alexander was great due to of his concern for others. For example, document C states during the battle of Tyre if you surrendered to him or sought sanctuary at the temple he would not kill you.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soon after his father's death, alexander took his fathers thrown and was in power and control. He used this opportunity to successfully conquer the Persian empire. he had a very powerful army, and he was known to be a genius for the military force. Alexander also succeeded to colonize the city of tyre.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is known as the King of Macedonia and conqueror of the Persian Empire. One of the writers of Alexander, Plutarch was ethnically Greek, but a citizen of Rome. The author takes famous Greek characters and compares them to Roman characters in his biographies; he has created the romantic picture of Alexander and used the story of Alexander to exemplify what is good leadership, and he does emphasize certain values that would be consider good qualities found in a leader, and the outcome of the use of such qualities. Being biased towards the Greeks, Plutarch successfully made his readers to believe that Alexander is a perfect model of leader by emphasizing maturity (insight) and ambition (courage) of Alexander, and by distorting…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Extraordinary Caris Daneker Pd. 8 In 336 B.C., there was a man named Alexander, from Macedonia. Alexander is now more modernly called “Alexander the Great”, for he did great things for the world and made history. Alexander did something so amazingthat the common man of his time would only dream about what he accomplished in only a decade!…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Identification and Evaluation of Sources The purpose of this investigation is to answer the question: To what extent did the military tactics and empire-building strategies of Alexander the Great influence the culture and later rulers of Europe? This source is a video about Alexander the Great from Youtube, a video sharing website, that is part of the Crash Course World History video series.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After he took power, he began establishing other city-states all names “Alexandria” His courage, leadership, and intelligence had made him great. Alexander the Great is the greatest because of his strong actions in the ancient times. Intelligence Alexander had intelligence by having the skills when building and fighting for his empire. The empire that he had inherited had grown a lot after Alexander took over.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander showed no mercy to innocent people, or even his own men. Although history has credited Alexander the “great” with building the largest empire the ancient world has ever seen, few realize his cruel,…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was worthy for his title. In the text it states,” The prince took charge in companion cavalry at age 18… Alexander became king of Macedonia at the age of 20.” This quote proves my opinion because he was in charge of the cavalry at a very young age, and he was responsible for the cavalry. Another piece of evidence to support my claim is,” Alexander’s army consisted of 40,000 soldiers… by a lion.” This quote proves my claim because he had lots of people in his own army that would protect Alexander’s citizens.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most common belief amongst Alexander’s critics is that he was a cruel and inattentive ruler. However, historians who believe this misconception fail to acknowledge the evidence that expresses Alexander’s redeeming qualities such as good leadership and loyalty to soldiers and friends. These historians also do not realize that a crucial aspect to a great leader is to be successful, which Alexander has more than demonstrated with his triumphs and guidance over territories under his control. Alexander III is entitled to be a distinguished historical figure and has rightfully earned the dignified title “Alexander the Great” through his remarkable leadership, the substantial impact that he had over his conquered territories, and his personal consideration for others, despite the fallacy that he was…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his path to capturing much of the world he had been egotistical and self-centered. When he worked to move from place to place, Alexander expected people to obey his commands. According to the article “Alexander the Great “ For their stubborn resistance, the inhabitants of the city were slaughtered and the survivors sold into slavery.” This shows that Alexander cared very little for the people he conquered. He worked very to ruin their civilizations and their lives in general.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays