This point of view has its advantages as the audience is able to see within the characters’ lives. This point of view also allows for the narrator to almost defend Mrs. Mallard’s feeling of being free after her husband’s death. Different point of views would alter the story greatly. For instance, had the story been in the first person, when Mrs. Mallard died at the end, the story would simply be over. There would be no more explanation and the ironic line at the end of the story would not be possible. An objective point of view would not allow for the audience to understand fully what was going on within Mrs. Mallard’s mind as she was realizing she was now free. Also, an editorial omniscience view point would not allow for the narrator to interject on Mrs. Mallard’s feelings and almost defend her feeling of being
This point of view has its advantages as the audience is able to see within the characters’ lives. This point of view also allows for the narrator to almost defend Mrs. Mallard’s feeling of being free after her husband’s death. Different point of views would alter the story greatly. For instance, had the story been in the first person, when Mrs. Mallard died at the end, the story would simply be over. There would be no more explanation and the ironic line at the end of the story would not be possible. An objective point of view would not allow for the audience to understand fully what was going on within Mrs. Mallard’s mind as she was realizing she was now free. Also, an editorial omniscience view point would not allow for the narrator to interject on Mrs. Mallard’s feelings and almost defend her feeling of being