Ireland V Brady Summary

Improved Essays
Show More
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Facts of the Case: John Leo Brady was arrested, tried and found guilty in a Maryland court for murder. The other man Donald Boblit had a separate trial. During Brady’s trial, he testified that even though he was involved with the robbery that Boblit was the one who committed the murder not him. The lawyer for Brady asked the prosecution to see all Boblit’s statements to get ready for trial but the prosecution withheld one statement in which Boblit admitted to committing the murder. Brady was found guilty by a jury of murder and was given a death sentence. Boblit was also found guilty of murder and was also sentenced to death. Brady’s lawyer appealed claiming that the prosecution had withheld exculpatory …show more content…
After being in the room awhile witnesses heard screaming coming from the room. The motel employees forced their way into the room where they found Sewell on top of Agurs fighting over a knife that Agurs was holding. Sewell was immediately taken to the hospital with stab wounds in which he later died. Agurs was arrested and charged with second-degree murder. During the trail, it was stated that after Agurs and Sewell had sexual intercourse that Sewell left the room and upon returning Sewell accused Agurs of taking $360 from his pants pockets. Agurs claims she was acting in self-defense when she stabbed Sewell. She said Sewell attacked her after accusing her of taking his money. Agurs was found guilty. Months later Agurs lawyer found out that the prosecution failed to bring forth key evidence in which Sewell had a criminal record which included violent behavior. The defense moved for a new trial. At first it was denied by the trial court but was later reversed by the court of appeals stating that a new trial was allowed since they jury may have given a different verdict had they known this information.
Issue: If a prosecutor fails to give information to the defense, is this depriving a defendant to their right to a fair trial if the prosecution withheld evidence requested or information that contained a testimony that was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sandra L. Jacobson Case Summary
    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sandra L. Jacobson Case Summary

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Chimel V. California
    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: Chimel V. California

    Opinion Ms. Justice Martinez delivers the opinion of the court. Appellant stands convicted of murdering Mr. Thompkins and possession of an illegal firearm. The Supreme Court of New Jersey found the conviction valid based primarily upon the confession unlawfully obtained from the appellant and the evidence brought to the court which was also unlawfully collected at the victim’s home. On December 24, the Ocean County Sherriff’s department was called to a wellness check of Mr. Thompkins.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Yilma's Court Case Analysis
    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Yilma's Court Case Analysis

    I feel the need to clarify that my perception of the decisions made by my team probably differ slightly from the other members, and my personal interpretation of our thought processes may not be accurate. However, I have discussed these same issues with the rest of the prosecution team and they seem to agree. During conversations with both defense teams, it was made clear to me that both councils were confused as to why the prosecution had decided to pursue robbery charges. In my opinion, the prosecution’s decision to charge Ponder and Yilma with robbery was based only on our belief that it was expected of us. Before the trial, when we the idea of pursuing robbery charges was presented to us, we couldn’t understand how robbery was a part of the crime.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Case Study
    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sacco And Vanzetti Case Study

    The jury felt that the match was a close enough one and rendered a guilty verdict and both men were sentenced to die (Owen, 2009). The guilty verdict was overturned after questions were raised to the validity of the ballistic tests. A known scam artist and self-proclaimed expert Alexander Hamilton, raised enough concerns to mandate a retrial (Newby, 2007). Years earlier, it was this same Hamilton character that almost cost an innocent man his life. Hamilton presented unscientific ballistic evidence to the jury but it was eventually discredited (Owen,…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    New Jersey V. Heart Case
    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    New Jersey V. Heart Case

    Imagine a person creating a plan of killing an innocent victim without the victim even knowing. One month ago, Heart was caught extracting the life of an innocuous elderly man because he vexed one of the man’s unique characteristics. Soon after Heart, the victim’s caretaker, confessed and was apprehended by the police, he made a testimony that explained his despicable plan, and how he accomplished his dreadful goal. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, in the case The State of New Jersey v. Heart, there is an extensive amount of evidence such as how the crime was premeditated, how he committed it deliberately, and how he executed the crime with malice that proves Heart guilty of first degree murder. To commence this argument, this crime was unquestionably…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Golden Age: The John Webster Trial
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Golden Age: The John Webster Trial

    It can be argued that the time between 1787 and 1861 was the “golden age” of law because it the set the precedent and truly allowed the judicial branch to shape their power. The “golden age” as the American Legal History stated was an era of transformation that gave structure to an industrial America. While there were many flaws in the decisions made by the court, many of the cases during this time gave future generations legal history in how to deal with murder. Cases such as the Dr. John Webster Trial and the Knapp Trial crated verdicts that still hold true today. Dr. John Webster Trial…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Case Study: Roadtrac
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Case Study: Roadtrac

    I believe something probably something could have been done prior to the verdict being done, but it appears it did not come to light until after the trial was over. With that said,…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Al Quade Pros And Cons
    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Al Quade Pros And Cons

    Moussaoui Issue: When the government asserts an evidentiary privilege in a criminal prosecution, may the court order the prosecution to choose between disclosing the information or having the indictment dismissed? Rule: When the government asserts an evidentiary privilege in a criminal prosecution, the court may order the prosecution to choose between disclosing the information or having the indictment dismissed. 1. Is the classified information Procedures Act (CIPA) which governs discovery criminal defendants have a right to receive certain information such as the information that the prosecution is using against the defendant.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Double Jeopardy Claims In Fatal Shooting Case
    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Double Jeopardy Claims In Fatal Shooting Case

    Double Jeopardy, in the Fifth Amendment, claims that one cannot be tried twice for the same crime. Once a trial has ended the government cannot choose to include new evidence and put a person on trial again. The right of Double Jeopardy is extremely important because it hinders the government from having the power to continuously try a person for the same crime. To be put on trial multiple times can get expensive, therefore it would make the most sense to only put a person on trial once. Although people should be tried if they have sincerely done something wrong, Double Jeopardy protects the defendants from having to constantly fear that they will be imprisoned.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Case Study: The Murder Of Bert
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Study: The Murder Of Bert

    Jack’s attorney moved to dismiss the charges of the attempt murder of Bert on the ground that Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunctioning of his gun, I think that the court made a wrong decision because first of all Jack tried to murder Bert which is attempt of murder and Jack should do sometime in prison. Throughout the case the court should had found Jack guilty because if Jack’s gun did not jam he would of shoot and killed Bert which is 1st degree murder and that can sentence him 25 to life. The court should look at the case in many different many ways because let’s say perhaps if Jack killed Bert the court would have found him guilty but since Jack did not kill Bert the court found him innocent. If Jack tried to murder someone…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Double Jeopardy Clause Research Paper
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Double Jeopardy Clause Research Paper

    Despite reservations concerning the potential for state prosecutorial inefficacy during a trial which might prohibit the federal government from meting out possibly deserved punishment in a subsequent federal trial, in the interest of citizen freedom and the right to due process, I would side with the dissenting opinion of the court, and hold that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies in the matter of Abbate v. United States. Central to the debate over the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause in federal prosecutorial action, is the original intent of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Mr. Justice Brennan’s majority opinion interprets the Double Jeopardy Clause as a preventative measure against an abusive federal government attempting to try and…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    He appealed his case all the way up to the Supreme Court, claiming that the confession had been obtained unconstitutionally. The Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution could not use Miranda’s confession as evidence because the police had not informed Miranda of his right to an attorney and his right against…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    R V Mulvihill Case Study
    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    R V Mulvihill Case Study

    LEGAL CITATION R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014, Fullerton J ELEMENTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CRIME ELEMENTS- Murder – Section 18 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) • Actus rea – An act or omission causing death. • Mens rea – Recklessly indifference to human life, or intention to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    O. J Simpson Trial: How The Media And Race Influenced The Decision
    • 2073 Words
    • 8 Pages

    O. J Simpson Trial: How The Media And Race Influenced The Decision

    The O.J. Simpson Trial: How the Media and Race Influenced the Decision The legal decision of The People versus O.J. Simpson forever changed legal proceedings in our country, and is regarded as one of the most controversial court rulings in American history. The murder trial was unique due to the high profile status of the people involved, the circumstances surrounding the crime, and the media attention that the case received from the media. The crime occurred in 1994 Los Angeles, a racially charged area of the country still feeling the wounds of the Rodney King incident. Due to the conditions of the crime, as well as the personal history of many of the officials involved, a lot of the American public felt that O.J. Simpson was an African-American…

    • 2073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Convictions
    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Convictions

    Often, statements from people with incentives to testify — particularly incentives that are not disclosed to the jury — are the central evidence in convicting an innocent person. The registry itself, which looks deeply into 873 specific cases of wrongful conviction, examined cases based on court documents as well as from groups that have long documented wrongful convictions. That group of wrongfully convicted spent more than 10,000 total years in prison, according to the report, with an average of 11 years…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings