Iraq War Realism

Improved Essays
The Iraq war happened through a span of eight years, eight months and twenty eight days. The invasion began when the United States forces wanted to search Iraq who were suspected to have weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and the need to topple the regime of Saddam Hussein, the former reigning leader of Ba’athist Iraq, as he was a threat of terrorism. This essay will provide a detailed analysis of what happened during the Iraq war and with the application to the theory of realism. Realism has been able to provide a view on the political action that US has taken when deciding to go to war with Iraq.
I will be arguing on points that are inclined to the realist theory. Firstly, US wanted to balance against the rising of power of Iraq which affected
…show more content…
One of the main reasons why the Iraq war happened was because US wanted to balance the power that was rising in Iraq. A claim was made by Senator Bill Nelson saying that Iraq was harbouring WMDs, were specifically chemical and biological and Saddam raised a threat to United States and their allies (Congressional Record, 2004). Before the claim was made, UN had already banned any development of WMDs in Iraq after the Persian Gulf War hence there should not have been any WMDs. The threats of nuclear and chemical weapons were then heightened after the attacks on the World Trade Centre. After the ambush, there were claims that Saddam was providing military help to Al-Qaeda (The Weekly Standard, 2003). This had aggravated the need to go to war and increase security. During the war, US successfully removed the regime of Saddam and confirmed that there were no possession of WMDs were to be found. Critics may say that if WMDs were not found, why did US still go through to war? As a realist, the two most important things to the state would be security and power. In this case, security was threatened and US had to act on it. The UN also contributed to why US proceeded with the war. They were not able to follow through the inspection of WMDs because Iraq did not provide permission to carry on with the inspection. Doubts of the presence of WMDs were floating around however the logical thing for realists was to …show more content…
In these wars that they have participated in, they had always emerged as victors. US had eventually been seen as a big super power in the world because of their military capacity and resources however, 9/11 had portrayed US as a weak and vulnerable state that terrorists can infiltrate. Bush’s West Point speech (Liberfield, 2005) declared, “America has, and intends to keep, military strengths beyond challenge.” With the emergence of Saddam, Al- Qaeda and WMD development in Iraq, it posed a great hazard for the US. According to the realism theory, the more the military power in your state, the more powerful you are. Bush took control of the situation by deciding to invade Iraq. Realism is effective in this argument because it displays the capability, military power and resources that showed US were the dominant powers in the world. United States had worked hard to gain hegemony through war victories and they were not going to let an attack like 9/11 bring the status of the state down. Critics may say that war should not happen just because of self-interest which in this case is maintaining the hegemony. I argue that realist believe that the only way to maintain hegemony is to use authoritative power which is the only way to maintain peace. Being a white super power, United States had to ensure that their power was not stripped and maintain order by proving that they had the ability to counter the threat of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Iraq War Analysis

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As a superpower, national interests and international influence are a great concern of U.S. Wars can be a tool to achieve goals. Afghanistan and The Iraq war were considered as these two strategic cards of U.S. The United States invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 was a response to 9/11 event – an action that was suspected by U.S is of terrorist group Al-Qaeda in order to prevent other security threat to U.S (BBC, 2016). Iraq war was launched in 2003 as a pre-emptive war because of the claim that Saddam Hussein government sponsored for terrorism and had weapons of mass destruction although there were no evidences (Benson, Brannen & Valentine, 2009). Besides victories such as: overthrowning Saddam Hussein and Taliban, eliminating Ossama Bin Laden…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ISIS Case Study

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result, the invasion in 2003 and countering ISIS is not relevant and criticizing Obama in this perspective is not suitable. In addition, the promise of Obama and changing plan of withdrawing American troops illustrated his creative strategy. Iraqi people suffered from war over ten year from 2003, the ending of long war is a desire of them. The new Iraqi government would also build a new state in the perspective of Iraq was destroyed in the long time. For these reason, Obama’s promise about the stoping of war is a method in order to guarant a positive future for Iraq and the presence of U.S army in Iraq for countering ISIS is also an assistance to government to escape from chaos.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defeating Communism

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unfortunately, the United States indirectly caused the rise in Islamic terrorism by siding with the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan and by continuously fighting the secular Saddam Hussein in the 1990’s. Once Arab nationalism lost its appeal, the new way to be “free from the West” became Islamic fundamentalism. While the real national interest of American security remained unchanged throughout the Cold War and into the 1990’s, American policy makers learned the dangers of focusing on only one enemy. Focusing all efforts against Communism allowed for the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, the new enemy of the United…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberalism In Iraq

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Realism reflects a view of the individual as primarily fearful and power seeking.” (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft, 76). This can be seen when Saddam Hussein tried to invade two of his neighbors. It was fearful when he invaded Iran because of Iran’s Shia majority population as well as equal military strength, while the invasion of Kuwait can be seen as an expansion of Iraqi power and authority. But when it comes to the 2003 United States invasion of Iraq it could be seen as an attempt to assert American power and influence over that part of the world. “Power, in turn, is primarily thought of in terms of the material resources” (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft, 76).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just War

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    As explained by Cushman, it was “justified on the basis of protecting the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein 's oppressive government and shielding the world from dangerous weapons in the hands of a tyrannous regime”, meaning that “Iraq required intervention” (Cushman, p. 404). The author understands that the war did not go as hoped, and that the existence of weapons of massive destruction and links with terrorism was not a fact, but he believed that the suffering of the people to Hussein’s regime was enough to consider it a “just war”. In fact, the author asks to some comprehension of Bush’s actions despite his many mistakes, since it could have made a difference for these innocent people, although the results were not the expected for them. Moreover, the war with Iraq follows some other criteria in order to be considered “just”. As it has already been explained, a “just war” can only be started when a government or authority is legitimate and there is a real chance of defeating the opponent.…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dale further went on to say “…if the government wanted more control over the people, including gun control, they have done both”. When asked which aspects on the United States response they felt have been least effective or even counterproductive, Dale stated “We have spent millions of dollars creating and fighting an enemy we have created, while ignoring the real enemy within”. He further stressed that “9/11 was a cover-up, safer now… hardly”. Nathan and Donald both had similar responses stating that we left Iraq to early prior to completing our mission. They both agreed they do not feel safer, because of the current ISIS group competing with Al Qaeda.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cause Of War Analysis

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages

    security in a post September 11 world”( Goldstein & Peevehouse 2014). This statement concludes that the rise of terrorism persuaded the American people and the Bush administration of the danger that Sadam posed to America which produce an agreement to take military action internationally to ensure the safety of American citizens. Coupled with the support and belief of Sadam’s threat to the U.S. enabled the Bush administration to go forward with its plan to fight the war on terrorism. “At the interstate level, the war may be attributed to the predominance of U.S. power. With no state willing to back Iraq militarily, the United States was free to attack Iraq without fear of a large scale response” (Goldstein & Peevehouse 2014).…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, when the military started working with us, they helped to get saddam out of power. This is important so that the people no longer had their ‘leader’ poisoning their minds. Ultimately, when asked if I believe that the war on Iraq will be looked at as a success or failure, I would argue that it was a failure. Simply, the war was not successful because we didn 't get done what we had intended to do. There is not sufficient democracy in Iraq, the middle east really isn 't anymore evolved now than it was when we first sent troops in, and our relationship with Iraq is still in shambles.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Argumentative Analysis

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first factor that makes powerful states struggle to achieve the intended political outcomes is military power restriction and the fear of escalation. To clarify, major military powers avoid the escalation to the extent that makes other major powers to interfere directly, or to use a destructive weapon like the atomic bomb. With the innovation of nuclear weapon the Clausewitz concept of “absolute war” is finally achievable. This will generate fear and will restraint powerful state from using maximum power to prevail. Thus the victory as a proper outcome to be expected of the use of American arms was intractable for the duration of the cold war, for the reason of the sensible fear of the escalation of nuclear holocaust.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article written by John Stoessinger and Marvin Gentlemen explains the risks and actions the America President takes to ensure that America was safe. Those two articles briefly explain the concept associated with the Iraq invasion as Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden was the main target for the 9/11 attack. President George W. Bush main focus was to ensure that another mass destruction does not happen again. Therefore, he had to come up with a…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays